INBC
Price
$8.26
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 4 closing price
ITCFY
Price
$16.70
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 27 closing price
Ad is loading...

INBC vs ITCFY

Header iconINBC vs ITCFY Comparison
Open Charts INBC vs ITCFYBanner chart's image
InBankshares
Price$8.26
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$6.25K
CapitalizationN/A
Investec
Price$16.70
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$154
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
INBC vs ITCFY Comparison Chart
Loading...
VS
INBC vs. ITCFY commentary
Oct 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is INBC is a Hold and ITCFY is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2024
Stock price -- (INBC: $8.21 vs. ITCFY: $16.70)
Brand notoriety: INBC and ITCFY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: INBC: 493% vs. ITCFY: 91%
Market capitalization -- INBC: $87.78M vs. ITCFY: $1.57B
INBC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $87.78M. ITCFY’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.57B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

INBC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileITCFY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • INBC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • ITCFY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, ITCFY is a better buy in the long-term than INBC.

Price Growth

INBC (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.18% price change this week, while ITCFY (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.82%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.91% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ITCFY($1.57B) has a higher market cap than INBC($87.8M). INBC has higher P/E ratio than ITCFY: INBC (7.30) vs ITCFY (5.69). ITCFY YTD gains are higher at: 47.599 vs. INBC (2.625). INBC has less debt than ITCFY: INBC (115M) vs ITCFY (20.1B). ITCFY has higher revenues than INBC: ITCFY (19.1B) vs INBC (53.2M).
INBCITCFYINBC / ITCFY
Capitalization87.8M1.57B6%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD2.62547.5996%
P/E Ratio7.305.69128%
Revenue53.2M19.1B0%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt115M20.1B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ITCFY: Fundamental Ratings
ITCFY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
33
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
48
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
18
SMR RATING
1..100
10
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
41
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
96
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
46

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL232.150.37
+0.16%
Apple
SPY582.350.05
+0.01%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
TSLA220.89-0.44
-0.20%
Tesla
BTC.X67399.836000-212.882810
-0.31%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME21.41-0.25
-1.15%
GameStop Corp

INBC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that INBC and MVLY have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that INBC and MVLY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To INBC
1D Price
Change %
INBC100%
N/A
MVLY - INBC
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.13%
BNMDF - INBC
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CNBB - INBC
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FFBW - INBC
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SBFG - INBC
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.16%
More

ITCFY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ITCFY has been loosely correlated with OTPBF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ITCFY jumps, then OTPBF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ITCFY
1D Price
Change %
ITCFY100%
N/A
OTPBF - ITCFY
43%
Loosely correlated
N/A
GSBX - ITCFY
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FFBW - ITCFY
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JFBC - ITCFY
10%
Poorly correlated
+0.25%
IITSF - ITCFY
7%
Poorly correlated
-0.51%
More