INCAF
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.02 (-28.57%)
Updated
May 20 closing price
NSVLF
Price
$0.10
Change
-$0.02 (-16.67%)
Updated
Dec 11 closing price
Ad is loading...

INCAF vs NSVLF

Header iconINCAF vs NSVLF Comparison
Open Charts INCAF vs NSVLFBanner chart's image
Inca One Gold
Price$0.05
Change-$0.02 (-28.57%)
Volume$6.2K
CapitalizationN/A
AUQ GOLD MNG
Price$0.10
Change-$0.02 (-16.67%)
Volume$1K
CapitalizationN/A
INCAF vs NSVLF Comparison Chart
Loading...
INCAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NSVLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
INCAF vs. NSVLF commentary
Dec 25, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is INCAF is a Buy and NSVLF is a Sell.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 25, 2024
Stock price -- (INCAF: $0.05 vs. NSVLF: $0.10)
Brand notoriety: INCAF and NSVLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: INCAF: 100% vs. NSVLF: 21%
Market capitalization -- INCAF: $5.04M vs. NSVLF: $1.3M
INCAF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $5.04M. NSVLF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $1.3M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.05B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

INCAF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNSVLF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • INCAF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NSVLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, NSVLF is a better buy in the long-term than INCAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

INCAF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NSVLF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • INCAF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • NSVLF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, INCAF is a better buy in the short-term than NSVLF.

Price Growth

INCAF (@Precious Metals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while NSVLF (@Precious Metals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -1.69%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.10%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.50%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-1.69% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
INCAF($5.04M) has a higher market cap than NSVLF($1.3M). NSVLF YTD gains are higher at: 150.000 vs. INCAF (-35.897). NSVLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -161.43K vs. INCAF (-1.76M). INCAF has more cash in the bank: 1.52M vs. NSVLF (43.3K). NSVLF has less debt than INCAF: NSVLF (219K) vs INCAF (10.4M). INCAF has higher revenues than NSVLF: INCAF (49.4M) vs NSVLF (0).
INCAFNSVLFINCAF / NSVLF
Capitalization5.04M1.3M389%
EBITDA-1.76M-161.43K1,089%
Gain YTD-35.897150.000-24%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue49.4M0-
Total Cash1.52M43.3K3,513%
Total Debt10.4M219K4,749%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
INCAF vs NSVLF: Fundamental Ratings
INCAF
NSVLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3998
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
75
Overvalued
55
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
99100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7359
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8524

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NSVLF's Valuation (55) in the null industry is in the same range as INCAF (75). This means that NSVLF’s stock grew similarly to INCAF’s over the last 12 months.

NSVLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as INCAF (100). This means that NSVLF’s stock grew similarly to INCAF’s over the last 12 months.

INCAF's SMR Rating (99) in the null industry is in the same range as NSVLF (100). This means that INCAF’s stock grew similarly to NSVLF’s over the last 12 months.

NSVLF's Price Growth Rating (59) in the null industry is in the same range as INCAF (73). This means that NSVLF’s stock grew similarly to INCAF’s over the last 12 months.

NSVLF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as INCAF (100). This means that NSVLF’s stock grew similarly to INCAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
INCAFNSVLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
19%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
INCAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NSVLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AULGX102.190.99
+0.98%
American Century Ultra® R5
IMAIX9.320.03
+0.32%
Delaware Ivy Multi-Asset Income I
GAONX20.030.05
+0.25%
JPMorgan Global Allocation R2
RSNYX30.82N/A
N/A
Victory Global Energy Transition Y
USCGX12.60N/A
N/A
Victory Capital Growth

INCAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, INCAF has been loosely correlated with NSVLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if INCAF jumps, then NSVLF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To INCAF
1D Price
Change %
INCAF100%
N/A
NSVLF - INCAF
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BBSRF - INCAF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.65%
ETFLF - INCAF
22%
Poorly correlated
+9.83%
HYMC - INCAF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.46%
HVGDF - INCAF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

NSVLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NSVLF has been loosely correlated with INCAF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NSVLF jumps, then INCAF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NSVLF
1D Price
Change %
NSVLF100%
N/A
INCAF - NSVLF
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
RDEXF - NSVLF
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.44%
IDR - NSVLF
25%
Poorly correlated
-2.19%
HUMRF - NSVLF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MPVDF - NSVLF
20%
Poorly correlated
-8.96%
More