Real estate exchange-traded funds (ETFs) sit at the intersection of several major market themes right now: interest-rate policy, the evolving logistics economy, data-center demand driven by artificial intelligence, and shifting consumer behavior. Comparing INDS and IYR is instructive because they represent two very different approaches to the same asset class. INDS is a narrow, thematic vehicle focused on industrial and self-storage properties, while IYR is a broad-based U.S. real estate benchmark fund. Rather than direct competitors, these funds offer alternative ways to express a view on real estate — one concentrated and conviction-driven, the other diversified and index-like. Understanding their structural differences is essential before choosing a positioning in the current market environment.
INDS is a passively managed thematic ETF that seeks to track the Solactive GPR Industrial Real Estate Index. The index is composed of developed-market companies deriving at least 85% of their earnings or revenues from industrial real estate operations, including self-storage. This makes it a highly concentrated, single-theme fund with a non-diversified structure and a portfolio of roughly 30–40 holdings.
The fund is dominated by logistics and storage names. Top holdings include PLD (Prologis), PSA (Public Storage), EXR (Extra Space Storage), EGP (EastGroup Properties), WPC (W.P. Carey), CUBE (CubeSmart), REXR (Rexford Industrial Realty), FR (First Industrial Realty Trust), and STAG (STAG Industrial). Its top three positions each account for roughly 14–15% of the portfolio, meaning a handful of names drive a large share of returns. Although the fund is U.S.-centric, roughly one-quarter of assets are allocated to developed international markets, including the United Kingdom and Japan. The expense ratio is 0.49%.
IYR is a passive, broad-market ETF that tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Real Estate Capped Index, which measures the entire U.S. real estate sector of the equity market. Launched in 2000, it holds approximately 65 securities and offers diversified exposure across virtually every real estate subsector, including industrial, retail, residential, office, healthcare, data centers, telecom towers, and self-storage.
Top holdings include WELL (Welltower), PLD (Prologis), AMT (American Tower), SPG (Simon Property Group), EQIX (Equinix), DLR (Digital Realty Trust), O (Realty Income), PSA (Public Storage), AVB (AvalonBay Communities), and VTR (Ventas). The top 10 names represent roughly 50% of assets, but no single holding exceeds about 11%, creating a more balanced risk profile. With a net expense ratio of about 0.37%, IYR is notably cheaper than INDS and carries substantially larger assets under management (AUM), contributing to strong liquidity.
The real estate sector is being reshaped by several durable forces. Industrial and logistics properties have benefited from the long-term growth of e-commerce and supply-chain reconfiguration, which directly supports INDS's core holdings. At the same time, demand for data centers — fueled by cloud computing and artificial intelligence — has strengthened segments of IYR such as digital infrastructure. Healthcare and senior housing REITs, another IYR exposure, are supported by favorable demographics.
The dominant macro variable for both funds remains interest-rate policy. Because REITs rely heavily on debt financing and are valued partly on dividend yield, higher-for-longer rates can compress valuations and raise capital costs. This is a shared risk across the two ETFs, though INDS's narrower focus makes it more vulnerable to a downturn in any single property type, whereas IYR's diversification helps cushion idiosyncratic shocks.
Over recent market cycles, the two funds have diverged in ways that reflect their structures rather than isolated price moves. INDS's concentrated industrial and self-storage exposure has been sensitive to swings in logistics demand and e-commerce growth expectations, producing higher relative volatility during sector rotations. IYR, by contrast, has exhibited more tempered movements because gains in one subsector — such as data centers or healthcare — can offset weakness in another, such as office or retail.
Fund performance over recent weeks and months has been shaped by shifting interest-rate expectations and sector rotation. When investors favor secular growth themes, INDS's logistics tilt tends to lead; when markets seek broad, defensive real estate income, IYR's diversified yield profile becomes more attractive. In relative-positioning terms, IYR's lower concentration, lower cost, and deeper liquidity generally translate into smoother tracking and more efficient risk-adjusted exposure for most investors.
Tickeron's AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market using technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of securities with customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities far more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener to surface data-driven opportunities aligned with your own strategy.
Between these two funds, Tickeron's AI would likely favor IYR. The reasoning is structural rather than based on any single price move: IYR offers a meaningfully lower expense ratio, a more diversified portfolio spanning multiple real estate subsectors, a longer operating history, and considerably deeper liquidity. These attributes tend to produce more consistent relative positioning and lower concentration risk. While INDS provides a compelling thematic vehicle for investors with strong conviction in industrial and self-storage real estate, its concentrated, single-theme exposure carries elevated risk. For a diversified core real estate allocation with stronger cost efficiency and broader sector coverage, IYR is the probabilistically favored choice.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for INDS turned positive on October 09, 2026. Looking at past instances where INDS's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 47 of 50 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 14, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on INDS as a result. In 71 of 81 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 88%.
INDS moved above its 50-day moving average on October 29, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.
The 10-day moving average for INDS crossed bullishly above the 50-day moving average on November 02, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted higher and could be considered a buy signal. In 15 of 16 past instances when the 10-day crossed above the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.
Following a +2.54% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where INDS advanced for three days, in 267 of 319 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 84%.
The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 197 of 243 cases where INDS Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 81%.
The 10-day RSI Indicator for INDS moved out of overbought territory on November 05, 2026. This could be a bearish sign for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 21 similar instances where the indicator moved out of overbought territory. In 19 of the 21 cases, the stock moved lower in the following days. This puts the odds of a move lower at 90%.
The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the overbought zone for 15 days. The longer the ticker stays in the overbought zone, the sooner a price pull-back is expected.
The 50-day moving average for INDS moved below the 200-day moving average on October 20, 2026. This could be a long-term bearish signal for the stock as the stock shifts to an downward trend.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where INDS declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 88%.
INDS broke above its upper Bollinger Band on November 04, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for IYR turned positive on October 09, 2026. Looking at past instances where IYR's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 40 of 47 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 85%.
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 12, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on IYR as a result. In 69 of 84 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 82%.
IYR moved above its 50-day moving average on October 29, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.
The 10-day moving average for IYR crossed bullishly above the 50-day moving average on November 02, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted higher and could be considered a buy signal. In 14 of 18 past instances when the 10-day crossed above the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 78%.
Following a +1.44% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where IYR advanced for three days, in 255 of 309 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 83%.
The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 224 of 298 cases where IYR Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 75%.
The 10-day RSI Indicator for IYR moved out of overbought territory on November 05, 2026. This could be a bearish sign for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 28 similar instances where the indicator moved out of overbought territory. In 26 of the 28 cases, the stock moved lower in the following days. This puts the odds of a move lower at 90%.
The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the overbought zone for 6 days. The longer the ticker stays in the overbought zone, the sooner a price pull-back is expected.
The 50-day moving average for IYR moved below the 200-day moving average on October 22, 2026. This could be a long-term bearish signal for the stock as the stock shifts to an downward trend.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where IYR declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 85%.
IYR broke above its upper Bollinger Band on November 04, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
| INDS | IYR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 84% | 10 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 88% | 6 days ago 85% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 75% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, INDS has been closely correlated with EXR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if INDS jumps, then EXR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To INDS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| INDS | 100% | -0.76% | ||
| EXR - INDS | 82% Closely correlated | -0.76% | ||
| CUBE - INDS | 82% Closely correlated | +0.04% | ||
| PSA - INDS | 81% Closely correlated | -0.66% | ||
| PLD - INDS | 75% Closely correlated | -0.34% | ||
| TRNO - INDS | 71% Closely correlated | -0.49% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IYR has been closely correlated with CUBE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IYR jumps, then CUBE could also see price increases.
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| EPI | 44.24 | 0.25 | +0.57% |
| WisdomTree India Earnings Fund (EPI) | |||
| DIVY | 32.01 | 0.01 | +0.03% |
| Sound Equity Dividend Income ETF (DIVY) | |||
| TBFG | 31.94 | N/A | N/A |
| Brinsmere Fund Growth ETF (TBFG) | |||
| ZJAN | 28.52 | N/A | N/A |
| Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr January | |||
| KBAB | 6.45 | N/A | N/A |
| KraneShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF (KBAB) | |||