Advertisement
INDV vs PAHC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is INDV is a Hold and PAHC is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
INDV’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePAHC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- INDV’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- PAHC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
INDV’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PAHC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- INDV’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- PAHC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
INDV (@Pharmaceuticals: Generic) experienced а +0.20% price change this week, while PAHC (@Pharmaceuticals: Generic) price change was +1.86% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Generic industry was -1.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +36.80%.
Reported Earning Dates
INDV is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.
PAHC is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Pharmaceuticals: Generic (-1.17% weekly)A generic drug contains the same chemical substance as a drug that was originally protected by patents. Generic drugs are generally sold at cheaper price points, compared to name-brand pharmaceuticals, after patents for the more expensive drugs lapse. The generic drug industry has created a major market, thanks to the lower pricing. According to the Center for Justice and Democracy at New York Law School, 80 percent of all drugs prescribed are generic, and generic drugs are chosen 94 percent of the time when they are available. But their manufacturers must be able to prove to the FDA that they can be effective substitutes for the original drugs. Some of the major generic drug makers include Zoetis, Inc., Allergan plc and Mylan N.V.
| INDV | PAHC | INDV / PAHC | |
| Capitalization | 4.12B | 1.55B | 266% |
| EBITDA | 438M | 233M | 188% |
| Gain YTD | -2.620 | 3.375 | -78% |
| P/E Ratio | 12.52 | 15.74 | 80% |
| Revenue | 1.33B | 1.52B | 88% |
| Total Cash | 222M | 82M | 271% |
| Total Debt | 509M | 789M | 65% |
INDV | PAHC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 81 Overvalued | 12 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 40 | 66 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 64 | 34 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 55 | 50 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 97 | 94 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PAHC's Valuation (12) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is significantly better than the same rating for INDV (81) in the null industry. This means that PAHC’s stock grew significantly faster than INDV’s over the last 12 months.
INDV's Profit vs Risk Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as PAHC (66) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry. This means that INDV’s stock grew similarly to PAHC’s over the last 12 months.
PAHC's SMR Rating (34) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is in the same range as INDV (64) in the null industry. This means that PAHC’s stock grew similarly to INDV’s over the last 12 months.
PAHC's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is in the same range as INDV (55) in the null industry. This means that PAHC’s stock grew similarly to INDV’s over the last 12 months.
PAHC's P/E Growth Rating (94) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is in the same range as INDV (97) in the null industry. This means that PAHC’s stock grew similarly to INDV’s over the last 12 months.
| INDV | PAHC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 70% | 4 days ago 71% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 66% | 4 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 71% | 4 days ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 73% | 4 days ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 68% | 4 days ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 21 days ago 70% | 6 days ago 73% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 71% | 4 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 74% | 4 days ago 73% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 68% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| UMMA | 37.64 | 0.44 | +1.18% |
| Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF | |||
| SPLB | 21.31 | 0.02 | +0.09% |
| State Street SPDR Port L/T Corp Bd ETF | |||
| TVE | 23.39 | -0.05 | -0.21% |
| Tennessee Valley Authority Power Bonds 1999 Series A due May 1 2029 | |||
| TMFE | 30.69 | -0.28 | -0.89% |
| Motley Fool Capital Efficiency 100 ETF | |||
| ELIL | 27.49 | -0.63 | -2.26% |
| Direxion Daily LLY Bull 2X Shares | |||
INDV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, INDV has been loosely correlated with SUPN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if INDV jumps, then SUPN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To INDV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| INDV | 100% | +0.32% | ||
| SUPN - INDV | 33% Loosely correlated | -1.00% | ||
| EBS - INDV | 31% Poorly correlated | -0.32% | ||
| XERS - INDV | 27% Poorly correlated | -0.70% | ||
| AMRX - INDV | 27% Poorly correlated | -2.41% | ||
| PAHC - INDV | 25% Poorly correlated | -0.86% | ||
More | ||||
PAHC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAHC has been loosely correlated with ZTS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PAHC jumps, then ZTS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PAHC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PAHC | 100% | -0.86% | ||
| ZTS - PAHC | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.63% | ||
| ELAN - PAHC | 47% Loosely correlated | +0.33% | ||
| VTRS - PAHC | 29% Poorly correlated | -0.35% | ||
| LFCR - PAHC | 27% Poorly correlated | +1.15% | ||
| AKBA - PAHC | 27% Poorly correlated | -0.87% | ||
More | ||||