49 days until earnings call

34 days until earnings call

Ad is loading...

INFN vs PI Comparison

Infinera

Price$6.65

Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)

Volume$14.77M

CapitalizationN/A

Impinj

Price$193.90

Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)

Volume$835.68K

CapitalizationN/A

View a ticker or compare two or three

VS

VS

INFN vs PI Comparison Chart

Loading...

Show more...

Show more...

INFN vs. PI commentary

Sep 20, 2024

COMPARISON

Comparison

Sep 20, 2024

Stock price -- (**INFN**: $6.65 vs. **PI**: $193.90)

Brand notoriety: **INFN** and **PI** are both not notable

Both companies represent the Telecommunications Equipment industry

Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: **INFN**: 188% vs. **PI**: 178%

Market capitalization -- **INFN**: $1.5B vs. **PI**: $3.49B

INFN [@Telecommunications Equipment] is valued at $1.5B. PI’s [@Telecommunications Equipment] market capitalization is $3.49B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Telecommunications Equipment] industry ranges from $202.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Telecommunications Equipment] industry is $4.87B.

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

**INFN**’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while**PI**’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

**INFN**’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.**PI**’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

**INFN**’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while **PI**’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

**INFN**’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.**PI**’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.

**INFN** (@Telecommunications Equipment) experienced а +3.42% price change this week, while **PI** (@Telecommunications Equipment) price change was +7.35% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the **@Telecommunications Equipment** industry was +2.54%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was +32.82%.

**INFN** is expected to report earnings on Nov 07, 2024.

**PI** is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2024.

The Telecommunications Equipment industry produces voice and data communications equipment, which includes fiber optic delivery products, digital signal processors, high-speed voice, data and video delivery. Additionally, satellite systems, global positioning systems, wireless data systems, personal communications equipment, telephone handsets and payload equipment for satellites also fall into this category. Apple Inc., QUALCOMM Incorporated and Nokia are major global players in this segment.

SUMMARIES

FUNDAMENTALS

Fundamentals

PI($3.49B) has a higher market cap than INFN($1.5B). PI YTD gains are higher at: 115.373 vs. INFN (40.000). INFN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 120M vs. PI (-26.83M). INFN has more cash in the bank: 163M vs. PI (113M). PI has less debt than INFN: PI (295M) vs INFN (738M). INFN has higher revenues than PI: INFN (1.65B) vs PI (308M).

INFN | PI | INFN / PI | |

Capitalization | 1.5B | 3.49B | 43% |

EBITDA | 120M | -26.83M | -447% |

Gain YTD | 40.000 | 115.373 | 35% |

P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |

Revenue | 1.65B | 308M | 534% |

Total Cash | 163M | 113M | 144% |

Total Debt | 738M | 295M | 250% |

FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS

INFN vs PI: Fundamental Ratings

INFN | PI | ||
---|---|---|---|

OUTLOOK RATING1..100 | 19 | 30 | |

VALUATIONovervalued / fair valued / undervalued1..100 | 87 Overvalued | 100 Overvalued | |

PROFIT vs RISK RATING1..100 | 76 | 17 | |

SMR RATING1..100 | 98 | 56 | |

PRICE GROWTH RATING1..100 | 39 | 35 | |

P/E GROWTH RATING1..100 | 55 | 38 | |

SEASONALITY SCORE1..100 | n/a | n/a |

*Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.*

INFN's Valuation (87) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is in the same range as PI (100) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that INFN’s stock grew similarly to PI’s over the last 12 months.

PI's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for INFN (76) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that PI’s stock grew somewhat faster than INFN’s over the last 12 months.

PI's SMR Rating (56) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for INFN (98) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that PI’s stock grew somewhat faster than INFN’s over the last 12 months.

PI's Price Growth Rating (35) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as INFN (39) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that PI’s stock grew similarly to INFN’s over the last 12 months.

PI's P/E Growth Rating (38) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as INFN (55) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that PI’s stock grew similarly to INFN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS

Technical Analysis

INFN | PI | |
---|---|---|

RSIODDS (%) | 2 days ago84% | 2 days ago71% |

StochasticODDS (%) | 2 days ago79% | 2 days ago83% |

MomentumODDS (%) | 2 days ago78% | 2 days ago87% |

MACDODDS (%) | 2 days ago73% | 2 days ago81% |

TrendWeekODDS (%) | 2 days ago74% | 2 days ago84% |

TrendMonthODDS (%) | 2 days ago74% | 2 days ago84% |

AdvancesODDS (%) | 8 days ago77% | 2 days ago86% |

DeclinesODDS (%) | 2 days ago79% | N/A |

BollingerBandsODDS (%) | 2 days ago86% | 2 days ago72% |

AroonODDS (%) | 2 days ago77% | 2 days ago84% |

View a ticker or compare two or three

VS

VS

Ad is loading...

Show more...

Show more...

Interesting Tickers

1D

1W

1M

1Q

6M

1Y

5Y

1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|

MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |

FCDAX | 37.26 | 0.07 | +0.19% |

Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Sm Cp A | |||

LSRCX | 3.46 | N/A | N/A |

Lord Abbett Small Cap Value C | |||

JVSIX | 17.46 | N/A | N/A |

Janus Henderson Small-Mid Cap Value I | |||

WSHFX | 62.75 | -0.18 | -0.28% |

American Funds Washington Mutual F1 | |||

PGRCX | 58.96 | -0.24 | -0.41% |

BNY Mellon Worldwide Growth C |

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, INFN has been loosely correlated with CIEN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if INFN jumps, then CIEN could also see price increases.

1D

1W

1M

1Q

6M

1Y

5Y

Ticker / NAME | Correlation To INFN | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|

INFN | 100% | -0.15% | ||

CIEN - INFN | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.05% | ||

ERIC - INFN | 37% Loosely correlated | -0.14% | ||

ZBRA - INFN | 37% Loosely correlated | -0.76% | ||

CLFD - INFN | 35% Loosely correlated | -0.93% | ||

ADTN - INFN | 34% Loosely correlated | -1.79% | ||

More |

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PI has been loosely correlated with ZBRA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PI jumps, then ZBRA could also see price increases.

1D

1W

1M

1Q

6M

1Y

5Y