INFT
Price
$9.74
Change
+$0.19 (+1.99%)
Updated
Nov 25 closing price
SBT
Price
$4.71
Change
-$0.14 (-2.89%)
Updated
Dec 18, 04:59 PM (EDT)
46 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

INFT vs SBT

Header iconINFT vs SBT Comparison
Open Charts INFT vs SBTBanner chart's image
Infinity Ban
Price$9.74
Change+$0.19 (+1.99%)
Volume$1.1K
CapitalizationN/A
Sterling Ban
Price$4.71
Change-$0.14 (-2.89%)
Volume$300
CapitalizationN/A
INFT vs SBT Comparison Chart
Loading...
INFT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SBT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
INFT vs. SBT commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is INFT is a Hold and SBT is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (INFT: $9.74 vs. SBT: $4.71)
Brand notoriety: INFT and SBT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: INFT: 18% vs. SBT: 283%
Market capitalization -- INFT: $31.1M vs. SBT: $260.34M
INFT [@Regional Banks] is valued at $31.1M. SBT’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $260.34M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

INFT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSBT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • INFT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SBT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, INFT is a better buy in the long-term than SBT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

INFT’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SBT’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • INFT’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SBT’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SBT is a better buy in the short-term than INFT.

Price Growth

INFT (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SBT (@Regional Banks) price change was -2.89% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -3.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.80%.

Reported Earning Dates

SBT is expected to report earnings on Feb 03, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-3.34% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SBT($260M) has a higher market cap than INFT($31.1M). SBT has higher P/E ratio than INFT: SBT (33.33) vs INFT (10.38). INFT YTD gains are higher at: 5.563 vs. SBT (-18.371). SBT has higher revenues than INFT: SBT (67.7M) vs INFT (9.24M).
INFTSBTINFT / SBT
Capitalization31.1M260M12%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD5.563-18.371-30%
P/E Ratio10.3833.3331%
Revenue9.24M67.7M14%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/A62.5M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
INFT vs SBT: Fundamental Ratings
INFT
SBT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3111
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
37
Fair valued
59
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
43100
SMR RATING
1..100
5158
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5157
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8440
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

INFT's Valuation (37) in the null industry is in the same range as SBT (59) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that INFT’s stock grew similarly to SBT’s over the last 12 months.

INFT's Profit vs Risk Rating (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SBT (100) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that INFT’s stock grew somewhat faster than SBT’s over the last 12 months.

INFT's SMR Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as SBT (58) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that INFT’s stock grew similarly to SBT’s over the last 12 months.

INFT's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as SBT (57) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that INFT’s stock grew similarly to SBT’s over the last 12 months.

SBT's P/E Growth Rating (40) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for INFT (84) in the null industry. This means that SBT’s stock grew somewhat faster than INFT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
INFTSBT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
25%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
19%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
10%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
15%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
13%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
11%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
21%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
INFT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SBT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AFGPX16.42N/A
N/A
Alger International Opportunities B
LHCSX20.03N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett Health Care R4
VEUVX31.83-0.78
-2.39%
JPMorgan Europe Dynamic R6
OIGNX30.98-0.78
-2.46%
Invesco Oppenheimer International Gr R
MAEGX14.31-0.41
-2.79%
BlackRock Unconstrained Equity Instl

INFT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that INFT and FIEB have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that INFT and FIEB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To INFT
1D Price
Change %
INFT100%
N/A
FIEB - INFT
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SBT - INFT
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.21%
FSUN - INFT
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.05%
BKUTK - INFT
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.62%
FGFH - INFT
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SBT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SBT has been loosely correlated with SMBK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SBT jumps, then SMBK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SBT
1D Price
Change %
SBT100%
-2.89%
SMBK - SBT
46%
Loosely correlated
-5.45%
BLFY - SBT
44%
Loosely correlated
-4.02%
WTBA - SBT
43%
Loosely correlated
-5.47%
MCBS - SBT
42%
Loosely correlated
-5.89%
FMAO - SBT
42%
Loosely correlated
-6.97%
More