INFT vs SBT
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is INFT is a Hold and SBT is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
INFT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSBT’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- INFT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- SBT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
SBT’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- SBT’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
INFT (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SBT (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +3.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.67%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.79%.
Reported Earning Dates
SBT is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Regional Banks (+3.08% weekly)Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
| INFT | SBT | INFT / SBT | |
| Capitalization | 31.1M | 260M | 12% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.642 | 1.681 | 574% |
| P/E Ratio | 10.38 | 33.33 | 31% |
| Revenue | 9.24M | 67.7M | 14% |
| Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | 62.5M | - |
INFT | SBT | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 48 | 32 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 51 Fair valued | 95 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 48 | 76 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 33 | 18 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | 50 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 67 | 3 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
INFT's Valuation (51) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SBT (95) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that INFT’s stock grew somewhat faster than SBT’s over the last 12 months.
INFT's Profit vs Risk Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as SBT (76) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that INFT’s stock grew similarly to SBT’s over the last 12 months.
SBT's SMR Rating (18) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as INFT (33) in the null industry. This means that SBT’s stock grew similarly to INFT’s over the last 12 months.
INFT's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as SBT (50) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that INFT’s stock grew similarly to SBT’s over the last 12 months.
SBT's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for INFT (67) in the null industry. This means that SBT’s stock grew somewhat faster than INFT’s over the last 12 months.
| SBT | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 19 days ago 66% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 19 days ago 54% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 19 days ago 56% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 19 days ago 62% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 19 days ago 57% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| PTH | 37.32 | 0.30 | +0.81% |
| Invesco Dorsey Wright Healthcare MomtETF | |||
| SPGM | 59.77 | 0.42 | +0.71% |
| SPDR® Portfolio MSCI Global Stk Mkt ETF | |||
| YLD | 18.71 | 0.10 | +0.54% |
| Principal Active High Yield ETF | |||
| VFH | 111.60 | 0.47 | +0.42% |
| Vanguard Financials ETF | |||
| FTWO | 30.04 | 0.12 | +0.39% |
| Strive Natural Resources and SecurityETF | |||
INFT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that INFT and FIEB have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that INFT and FIEB's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To INFT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| INFT | 100% | N/A | ||
| FIEB - INFT | 32% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SBT - INFT | 27% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| FSUN - INFT | 23% Poorly correlated | +0.74% | ||
| BKUTK - INFT | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| FGFH - INFT | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
SBT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SBT has been loosely correlated with BLFY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SBT jumps, then BLFY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SBT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SBT | 100% | N/A | ||
| BLFY - SBT | 43% Loosely correlated | +0.91% | ||
| CZNC - SBT | 39% Loosely correlated | +0.43% | ||
| WTBA - SBT | 38% Loosely correlated | +1.93% | ||
| NKSH - SBT | 37% Loosely correlated | +0.80% | ||
| BY - SBT | 37% Loosely correlated | +0.88% | ||
More | ||||