INGR vs LANC
Loading...
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is INGR is a Hold and LANC is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
INGR’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileLANC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- INGR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- LANC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
INGR’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LANC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- INGR’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- LANC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
INGR (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а -0.91% price change this week, while LANC (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was -1.87% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was +1.54%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.00%.
Reported Earning Dates
INGR is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2024.
LANC is expected to report earnings on Aug 22, 2024.
Industries' Descriptions
@Food: Specialty/Candy (+1.54% weekly)A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.
| INGR | LANC | INGR / LANC | |
| Capitalization | 7.69B | 5.67B | 136% |
| EBITDA | 1.17B | 244M | 480% |
| Gain YTD | 10.265 | 16.245 | 63% |
| P/E Ratio | 12.21 | 43.94 | 28% |
| Revenue | 8.16B | 1.87B | 437% |
| Total Cash | 409M | 134M | 305% |
| Total Debt | 2.4B | 13.3M | 18,053% |
INGR | LANC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 21 | 15 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 28 Undervalued | 47 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 24 | 38 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 50 | 59 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 49 | 54 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 69 | 69 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
INGR's Valuation (28) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry is in the same range as LANC (47) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that INGR’s stock grew similarly to LANC’s over the last 12 months.
INGR's Profit vs Risk Rating (24) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry is in the same range as LANC (38) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that INGR’s stock grew similarly to LANC’s over the last 12 months.
INGR's SMR Rating (50) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry is in the same range as LANC (59) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that INGR’s stock grew similarly to LANC’s over the last 12 months.
INGR's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry is in the same range as LANC (54) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that INGR’s stock grew similarly to LANC’s over the last 12 months.
INGR's P/E Growth Rating (69) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry is in the same range as LANC (69) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that INGR’s stock grew similarly to LANC’s over the last 12 months.
| INGR | LANC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 46% | 1 day ago 72% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 49% | 1 day ago 45% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% | 1 day ago 58% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 50% | 1 day ago 72% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 48% | 1 day ago 46% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 55% | 1 day ago 54% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 54% | 7 days ago 58% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 48% | 1 day ago 46% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 45% | 1 day ago 66% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 54% | 1 day ago 48% |
INGR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, INGR has been loosely correlated with SMPL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if INGR jumps, then SMPL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To INGR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| INGR | 100% | +1.04% | ||
| SMPL - INGR | 40% Loosely correlated | +0.94% | ||
| CAG - INGR | 40% Loosely correlated | +1.87% | ||
| K - INGR | 39% Loosely correlated | +0.50% | ||
| MDLZ - INGR | 39% Loosely correlated | +0.83% | ||
| POST - INGR | 38% Loosely correlated | +1.02% | ||
More | ||||
LANC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LANC has been loosely correlated with CAG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LANC jumps, then CAG could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LANC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LANC | 100% | -0.42% | ||
| CAG - LANC | 35% Loosely correlated | +1.87% | ||
| FLO - LANC | 33% Poorly correlated | -0.08% | ||
| INGR - LANC | 31% Poorly correlated | +1.04% | ||
| STKL - LANC | 31% Poorly correlated | +0.36% | ||
| TR - LANC | 31% Poorly correlated | +1.01% | ||
More | ||||