INLX vs SCWX
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is INLX is a Hold and SCWX is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
INLX’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSCWX’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- INLX’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- SCWX’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
INLX’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SCWX’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- INLX’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- SCWX’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
INLX (@Packaged Software) experienced а -2.28% price change this week, while SCWX (@Packaged Software) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +1.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.02%.
Reported Earning Dates
INLX is expected to report earnings on Mar 26, 2025.
SCWX is expected to report earnings on Mar 27, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (+1.28% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| INLX | SCWX | INLX / SCWX | |
| Capitalization | 25.9M | 533M | 5% |
| EBITDA | 2.93M | -60.9M | -5% |
| Gain YTD | 175.779 | 14.499 | 1,212% |
| P/E Ratio | 57.91 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 16.7M | 366M | 5% |
| Total Cash | 1.69M | 68.7M | 2% |
| Total Debt | 5.81M | 7.8M | 74% |
INLX | SCWX | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 83 | 81 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 92 Overvalued | 25 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 15 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 90 | 94 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 35 | 43 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 1 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SCWX's Valuation (25) in the Packaged Software industry is significantly better than the same rating for INLX (92) in the null industry. This means that SCWX’s stock grew significantly faster than INLX’s over the last 12 months.
INLX's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SCWX (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that INLX’s stock grew significantly faster than SCWX’s over the last 12 months.
INLX's SMR Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as SCWX (94) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that INLX’s stock grew similarly to SCWX’s over the last 12 months.
INLX's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as SCWX (43) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that INLX’s stock grew similarly to SCWX’s over the last 12 months.
INLX's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SCWX (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that INLX’s stock grew significantly faster than SCWX’s over the last 12 months.
| INLX | SCWX | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 75% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 75% | 16 days ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 4 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 79% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| MNHRX | 25.93 | N/A | N/A |
| Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Max Term R | |||
| CIAOX | 46.30 | -0.16 | -0.34% |
| Capital Advisors Growth Investor | |||
| JIGIX | 27.91 | -0.17 | -0.61% |
| JHancock International Growth R4 | |||
| NIOCX | 12.78 | -0.11 | -0.88% |
| Neuberger Berman Intl Small Cap C | |||
| LVOAX | 19.63 | -0.23 | -1.16% |
| Lord Abbett Value Opportunities A | |||
INLX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that INLX and QXO have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that INLX and QXO's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To INLX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| INLX | 100% | -0.96% | ||
| QXO - INLX | 24% Poorly correlated | -4.01% | ||
| PYCR - INLX | 24% Poorly correlated | -0.93% | ||
| LTCH - INLX | 22% Poorly correlated | -3.92% | ||
| GEN - INLX | 21% Poorly correlated | -1.18% | ||
| SCWX - INLX | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
SCWX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCWX has been loosely correlated with CLSK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCWX jumps, then CLSK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCWX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCWX | 100% | -0.12% | ||
| CLSK - SCWX | 46% Loosely correlated | -8.41% | ||
| TEAM - SCWX | 44% Loosely correlated | -7.26% | ||
| RIOT - SCWX | 40% Loosely correlated | -14.46% | ||
| COMP - SCWX | 39% Loosely correlated | -10.45% | ||
| COIN - SCWX | 37% Loosely correlated | -10.20% | ||
More | ||||