Ad is loading...
Ad is loading...
INNO vs IWP
INNO vs IWP Comparison
Open Charts INNO vs IWP
Harbor Disruptive Innovation ETF
Price$16.54
Change-$0.40 (-2.36%)
Volume$1.58K
CapitalizationN/A
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF
Price$127.95
Change-$1.16 (-0.90%)
Volume$3.4M
CapitalizationN/A
INNO vs IWP Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
INNO vs. IWP commentary
Nov 17, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is INNO is a Buy and IWP is a Sell.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWP has more net assets: 16.9B vs. INNO (3.72M). IWP has a higher annual dividend yield than INNO: IWP (22.905) vs INNO (14.227). INNO was incepted earlier than IWP: INNO (3 years) vs IWP (23 years). INNO has a higher turnover IWP (26.00) vs IWP (26.00).
| INNO | IWP | INNO / IWP | |
| Gain YTD | 14.227 | 22.905 | 62% |
| Net Assets | 3.72M | 16.9B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 77.00 | 26.00 | 296% |
| Yield | 0.00 | 0.47 | - |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 23 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| INNO | IWP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 79% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 84% | 7 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
INNO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, INNO has been closely correlated with PCOR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if INNO jumps, then PCOR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To INNO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| INNO | 100% | -2.38% | ||
| PCOR - INNO | 67% Closely correlated | -3.44% | ||
| MNDY - INNO | 52% Loosely correlated | -2.24% | ||
| TOST - INNO | 47% Loosely correlated | +0.59% | ||
| GTLB - INNO | 47% Loosely correlated | -2.09% | ||
| CCCS - INNO | 41% Loosely correlated | -0.59% | ||
More | ||||
IWP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWP has been closely correlated with EXP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWP jumps, then EXP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWP | 100% | -0.90% | ||
| EXP - IWP | 72% Closely correlated | -1.41% | ||
| ENTG - IWP | 70% Closely correlated | -3.77% | ||
| KEYS - IWP | 70% Closely correlated | -2.80% | ||
| PTC - IWP | 68% Closely correlated | -0.58% | ||
| KKR - IWP | 68% Closely correlated | -0.33% | ||
More | ||||