INRLF vs IPHYF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is INRLF is a Hold and IPHYF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
INRLF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileIPHYF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- INRLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- IPHYF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Price Growth
INRLF (@Biotechnology) experienced а +1.09% price change this week, while IPHYF (@Biotechnology) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Biotechnology industry was +0.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.27%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Biotechnology (+0.91% weekly)Biotechnology involves genetic or protein engineering to produce medicines/therapies for treating and preventing ailments. The industry also provides crucial ingredients for diagnostics. This multi-billion-dollar industry is heavily focused on research and development, as companies attempt to continually come up with cutting-edge solutions for health. New discoveries for the treatment of diseases provide opportunities for growth for a company in this industry. Discoveries, however, must pass the regulatory approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) before they can make it to markets. Amgen Inc., Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Celgene Corporation are examples of companies in this industry.
| INRLF | IPHYF | INRLF / IPHYF | |
| Capitalization | 497M | 182M | 273% |
| EBITDA | 19M | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | -45.365 | -20.951 | 217% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 151M | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | 131M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 210M | N/A | - |
INRLF | IPHYF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 25 | 42 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 52 Fair valued | 66 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 94 | 94 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 88 | 57 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 84 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
INRLF's Valuation (52) in the null industry is in the same range as IPHYF (66). This means that INRLF’s stock grew similarly to IPHYF’s over the last 12 months.
INRLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as IPHYF (100). This means that INRLF’s stock grew similarly to IPHYF’s over the last 12 months.
INRLF's SMR Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as IPHYF (94). This means that INRLF’s stock grew similarly to IPHYF’s over the last 12 months.
IPHYF's Price Growth Rating (57) in the null industry is in the same range as INRLF (88). This means that IPHYF’s stock grew similarly to INRLF’s over the last 12 months.
INRLF's P/E Growth Rating (84) in the null industry is in the same range as IPHYF (100). This means that INRLF’s stock grew similarly to IPHYF’s over the last 12 months.
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
INRLF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, INRLF has been loosely correlated with VALN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if INRLF jumps, then VALN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To INRLF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| INRLF | 100% | N/A | ||
| VALN - INRLF | 41% Loosely correlated | +0.36% | ||
| IKT - INRLF | 22% Poorly correlated | +21.13% | ||
| NBTX - INRLF | 20% Poorly correlated | -3.48% | ||
| IMMX - INRLF | 20% Poorly correlated | +17.36% | ||
| VXRT - INRLF | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.79% | ||
More | ||||
IPHYF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IPHYF has been loosely correlated with ONPPF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IPHYF jumps, then ONPPF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IPHYF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IPHYF | 100% | N/A | ||
| ONPPF - IPHYF | 41% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| IUGNF - IPHYF | 13% Poorly correlated | -5.26% | ||
| INRLF - IPHYF | 10% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| INNMF - IPHYF | 7% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| INTI - IPHYF | 4% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||