Ad is loading...
INRSX vs TRNEX
INRSX vs TRNEX Comparison
Open Charts INRSX vs TRNEX
Macquarie Natural Resources R6
Price$15.18
Change+$0.04 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets157.5M
T. Rowe Price New Era I
Price$35.99
Change+$0.05 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.19B
INRSX vs TRNEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
INRSX vs. TRNEX commentary
Apr 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is INRSX is a Buy and TRNEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRNEX has more cash in the bank: 2.19B vs. INRSX (158M). INRSX pays higher dividends than TRNEX: INRSX (5.60) vs TRNEX (2.20). INRSX was incepted earlier than TRNEX: INRSX (11 years) vs TRNEX (9 years). INRSX (1.10) is less costly to investors than TRNEX (0.57). INRSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. TRNEX (24.30). INRSX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRNEX: INRSX (0) vs TRNEX (500000). INRSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.93 vs. TRNEX (-10.26). INRSX return over 5 years is better than : 86.57 vs. TRNEX (69.38).
| INRSX | TRNEX | INRSX / TRNEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.57 | 167% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.57 | 193% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.444 | -3.153 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 500000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 158M | 2.19B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.60 | 2.20 | 254% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.93 | -10.26 | 68% |
| Returns for 3 years | -3.51 | -5.73 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | 86.57 | 69.38 | 125% |
| Returns for 10 years | 1.06 | N/A | - |