International Seaways (INSW) and Teekay Tankers (TNK) represent two prominent players in the maritime transportation of energy commodities. This comparison examines their business models, recent stock performance, and relative positioning in the current market environment. The analysis is relevant for traders and investors seeking exposure to the tanker shipping sector, where freight rates and global oil flows influence results. It highlights contrasts in scale, financial structure, and momentum without favoring one over the other.
International Seaways, Inc. operates a fleet of oceangoing vessels primarily engaged in the transportation of crude oil and refined petroleum products. The company segments its operations into crude tankers and product carriers. In recent market activity, INSW shares have advanced notably, with the stock trading near $108 after climbing from the low $90s earlier in the period. Performance has been supported by strong quarterly results, including record net income and revenue growth exceeding 100 percent year-over-year in the most recent reporting cycle. One-month returns approached 17 percent, while three-month gains reached approximately 39 percent, reflecting sustained positive sentiment tied to favorable tanker market conditions.
Teekay Tankers Ltd. specializes in the marine transportation of crude oil and other petroleum products through its owned and chartered fleet. The company focuses on spot and time-charter contracts in the tanker segment. During recent market activity, TNK shares have risen to the $99–$102 range, up from the mid-$80s in prior weeks. The stock delivered one-month gains near 17 percent and three-month advances of about 34 percent. Earnings momentum has contributed, with second-quarter results showing substantial increases in revenue and net income compared to the prior year, aligning with broader sector strength in freight rates.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of AI trading bots from hundreds available across thousands of tickers. Only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with prevailing market conditions earn placement in this section. Available bots span diverse trading styles, strategies, timeframes, and performance statistics, with historical win rates and returns varying by bot and asset universe. This resource allows users to explore data-driven options suited to current trends. Review the full collection on the Trending AI Robots page for detailed metrics and configurations.
Both companies operate similar business models centered on tanker fleets for energy transport, exposing them to comparable sector drivers such as oil demand, geopolitical factors, and vessel supply. INSW maintains greater scale with higher revenue and EBITDA, yet carries elevated debt levels relative to TNK, which holds a larger cash reserve and minimal debt. Recent momentum has favored INSW in year-to-date returns, though both have posted solid advances amid positive freight environments. Risk factors include cyclical shipping rates for each, with TNK presenting a more conservative balance sheet that may appeal in volatile periods. Market sentiment for the pair remains aligned with tanker fundamentals, offering trade-offs between growth-oriented scale and financial stability.
Based on observable factors including trend consistency, earnings momentum, and relative market positioning, Tickeron’s AI models would currently assign a higher probabilistic preference to INSW over TNK. The larger capitalization, sustained recent performance, and sector exposure provide a modest edge in modeled scenarios, though outcomes remain subject to ongoing market variables.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
INSW | TNK | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 44 | 91 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 3 Undervalued | 38 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 3 | 14 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 27 | 35 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 35 | 36 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 74 | 49 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
INSW's Valuation (3) in the Marine Shipping industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TNK (38). This means that INSW’s stock grew somewhat faster than TNK’s over the last 12 months.
INSW's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as TNK (14). This means that INSW’s stock grew similarly to TNK’s over the last 12 months.
INSW's SMR Rating (27) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as TNK (35). This means that INSW’s stock grew similarly to TNK’s over the last 12 months.
INSW's Price Growth Rating (35) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as TNK (36). This means that INSW’s stock grew similarly to TNK’s over the last 12 months.
TNK's P/E Growth Rating (49) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as INSW (74). This means that TNK’s stock grew similarly to INSW’s over the last 12 months.
| INSW | TNK | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 73% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 62% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 69% | 8 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 73% |
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
INSW’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green while TNK’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
INSW’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TNK’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
INSW (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а +9.30% price change this week, while TNK (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price change was +7.37% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was +1.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.62%.
INSW is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2026.
TNK is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.
Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| FELC | 43.42 | 0.10 | +0.23% |
| Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF (FELC) | |||
| TJUN | 22.97 | 0.02 | +0.10% |
| FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF June (TJUN) | |||
| OCTT | 48.48 | -0.01 | -0.02% |
| AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Oct ETF (OCTT) | |||
| IBMP | 25.19 | -0.05 | -0.20% |
| iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMP) | |||
| SDFI | 34.72 | -0.09 | -0.26% |
| AB Short Duration Income ETF (SDFI) | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TNK has been closely correlated with INSW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TNK jumps, then INSW could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TNK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TNK | 100% | +4.07% | ||
| INSW - TNK | 86% Closely correlated | +4.05% | ||
| TK - TNK | 84% Closely correlated | +2.46% | ||
| FRO - TNK | 81% Closely correlated | +4.61% | ||
| STNG - TNK | 81% Closely correlated | +2.50% | ||
| DHT - TNK | 81% Closely correlated | +4.39% | ||
More | ||||