INTZ
Price
$1.23
Change
-$0.07 (-5.38%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
5.44M
ISGIF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Feb 11 closing price
Capitalization
1.12M
Ad is loading...

INTZ vs ISGIF

Header iconINTZ vs ISGIF Comparison
Open Charts INTZ vs ISGIFBanner chart's image
Intrusion
Price$1.23
Change-$0.07 (-5.38%)
Volume$594.86K
Capitalization5.44M
INSURAGUEST TECHNOLOGIES
Price$0.03
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$13K
Capitalization1.12M
INTZ vs ISGIF Comparison Chart
Loading...
INTZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
INTZ vs. ISGIF commentary
Feb 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is INTZ is a Hold and ISGIF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 23, 2025
Stock price -- (INTZ: $1.23 vs. ISGIF: $0.03)
Brand notoriety: INTZ and ISGIF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: INTZ: 5% vs. ISGIF: 36%
Market capitalization -- INTZ: $5.44M vs. ISGIF: $1.12M
INTZ [@Packaged Software] is valued at $5.44M. ISGIF’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $1.12M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

INTZ’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileISGIF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • INTZ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • ISGIF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both INTZ and ISGIF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

INTZ’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • INTZ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

INTZ (@Packaged Software) experienced а -25.90% price change this week, while ISGIF (@Packaged Software) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -2.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was +26.50%.

Reported Earning Dates

INTZ is expected to report earnings on May 14, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-2.81% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
INTZ($5.44M) has a higher market cap than ISGIF($1.12M). ISGIF YTD gains are higher at: -1.667 vs. INTZ (-60.000). ISGIF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -861.95K vs. INTZ (-12.51M). ISGIF has less debt than INTZ: ISGIF (25K) vs INTZ (12.3M). INTZ has higher revenues than ISGIF: INTZ (5.69M) vs ISGIF (636K).
INTZISGIFINTZ / ISGIF
Capitalization5.44M1.12M487%
EBITDA-12.51M-861.95K1,451%
Gain YTD-60.000-1.6673,600%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue5.69M636K894%
Total CashN/A316K-
Total Debt12.3M25K49,200%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
INTZ: Fundamental Ratings
INTZ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
51
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
94
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
60
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
46
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
INTZ
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
INTZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MIGHX42.24-0.56
-1.31%
MFS Massachusetts Inv Gr Stk R3
WPSIX52.21-0.75
-1.42%
AB Concentrated Growth I
RPXIX28.91-0.61
-2.07%
RiverPark Large Growth Institutional
WLCGX53.36-1.38
-2.52%
Wilshire Large Company Growth Instl
LADYX27.85-1.27
-4.36%
Lord Abbett Developing Growth I

INTZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, INTZ has been loosely correlated with REKR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if INTZ jumps, then REKR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To INTZ
1D Price
Change %
INTZ100%
-5.38%
REKR - INTZ
42%
Loosely correlated
-7.61%
HUBC - INTZ
36%
Loosely correlated
-5.57%
PSFE - INTZ
34%
Loosely correlated
-1.99%
BMR - INTZ
34%
Loosely correlated
-3.65%
IDAI - INTZ
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

ISGIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ISGIF and FHGDF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ISGIF and FHGDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ISGIF
1D Price
Change %
ISGIF100%
N/A
FHGDF - ISGIF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IGGGF - ISGIF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
INTZ - ISGIF
10%
Poorly correlated
-5.38%
INTV - ISGIF
7%
Poorly correlated
+7.61%
INXSF - ISGIF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More