INTZ
Price
$1.31
Change
+$0.06 (+4.76%)
Updated
Apr 28, 02:32 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
5.44M
ISGIF
Price
$0.01
Change
-$0.01 (-50.00%)
Updated
Apr 21 closing price
Capitalization
1.12M
Ad is loading...

INTZ vs ISGIF

Header iconINTZ vs ISGIF Comparison
Open Charts INTZ vs ISGIFBanner chart's image
Intrusion
Price$1.31
Change+$0.06 (+4.76%)
Volume$350
Capitalization5.44M
INSURAGUEST TECHNOLOGIES
Price$0.01
Change-$0.01 (-50.00%)
Volume$4.5K
Capitalization1.12M
INTZ vs ISGIF Comparison Chart
Loading...
INTZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
INTZ vs. ISGIF commentary
Apr 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is INTZ is a StrongBuy and ISGIF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 28, 2025
Stock price -- (INTZ: $1.26 vs. ISGIF: $0.01)
Brand notoriety: INTZ and ISGIF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: INTZ: 36% vs. ISGIF: 41%
Market capitalization -- INTZ: $5.44M vs. ISGIF: $1.12M
INTZ [@Packaged Software] is valued at $5.44M. ISGIF’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $1.12M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.26B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

INTZ’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileISGIF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • INTZ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • ISGIF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, INTZ is a better buy in the long-term than ISGIF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

INTZ’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • INTZ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

INTZ (@Packaged Software) experienced а +21.15% price change this week, while ISGIF (@Packaged Software) price change was -36.47% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +7.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.03%.

Reported Earning Dates

INTZ is expected to report earnings on Feb 27, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+7.25% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
INTZ($5.44M) has a higher market cap than ISGIF($1.12M). INTZ YTD gains are higher at: -59.024 vs. ISGIF (-64.000). ISGIF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -861.95K vs. INTZ (-12.51M). ISGIF has less debt than INTZ: ISGIF (25K) vs INTZ (12.3M). INTZ has higher revenues than ISGIF: INTZ (5.69M) vs ISGIF (636K).
INTZISGIFINTZ / ISGIF
Capitalization5.44M1.12M487%
EBITDA-12.51M-861.95K1,451%
Gain YTD-59.024-64.00092%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue5.69M636K894%
Total CashN/A316K-
Total Debt12.3M25K49,200%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
INTZ: Fundamental Ratings
INTZ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
32
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
99
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
52
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
41
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
INTZ
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
INTZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CAMZX15.600.01
+0.06%
Cambiar Small Cap Instl
BDBPX21.440.01
+0.05%
iShares Russell 2000 Small-Cap Idx Inv P
VIESX15.86-0.02
-0.13%
Virtus KAR Emerging Markets Small-Cap I
GSSMX30.72-0.10
-0.32%
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value A
JGRCX104.53-0.47
-0.45%
Janus Henderson Enterprise C

INTZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, INTZ has been loosely correlated with HUBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if INTZ jumps, then HUBC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To INTZ
1D Price
Change %
INTZ100%
N/A
HUBC - INTZ
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.97%
BMR - INTZ
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.99%
REKR - INTZ
42%
Loosely correlated
+4.92%
PSFE - INTZ
34%
Loosely correlated
+1.90%
PERF - INTZ
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.53%
More

ISGIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ISGIF and FHGDF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ISGIF and FHGDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ISGIF
1D Price
Change %
ISGIF100%
N/A
FHGDF - ISGIF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IGGGF - ISGIF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
INTZ - ISGIF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
INTV - ISGIF
7%
Poorly correlated
-2.07%
INXSF - ISGIF
7%
Poorly correlated
+12.85%
More