Analysis and predictions IPAC vs WDS
Loading...
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IPAC is a Hold and WDS is a Hold.
WDS | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 16 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 90 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 78 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 4 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| IPAC | WDS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 52% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 54% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 76% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 69% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 71% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 60% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 74% | 5 days ago 68% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 56% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 72% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| RICBX | 53.93 | 0.56 | +1.05% |
| American Funds Invmt Co of Amer R2 | |||
| DSHFX | 10.57 | 0.10 | +0.96% |
| Brinker Capital Destinations Shelter I | |||
| NRIQX | 13.01 | 0.10 | +0.77% |
| Neuberger Berman International Eq R6 | |||
| FBFQX | 12.35 | 0.08 | +0.65% |
| Franklin Managed Income R | |||
| GAMPX | 12.32 | 0.05 | +0.41% |
| GS Energy Infrastructure Fd P | |||
IPAC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IPAC has been loosely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IPAC jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IPAC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IPAC | 100% | +1.17% | ||
| BHP - IPAC | 65% Loosely correlated | +1.22% | ||
| HMC - IPAC | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.67% | ||
| RIO - IPAC | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.97% | ||
| MFG - IPAC | 54% Loosely correlated | +1.28% | ||
| WDS - IPAC | 54% Loosely correlated | +1.52% | ||
More | ||||
WDS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WDS has been loosely correlated with COP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WDS jumps, then COP could also see price increases.