IPAY
Price
$43.54
Change
-$1.83 (-4.03%)
Updated
Jun 3, 04:57 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
159.19M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
JETS
Price
$27.83
Change
-$0.67 (-2.35%)
Updated
Jun 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
860.36M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

IPAY vs JETS

Header iconIPAY vs JETS Comparison
Open Charts IPAY vs JETSBanner chart's image
IPAY vs JETS Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? Amplify Digital Payments ETF (IPAY) vs. U.S. Global JETS ETF (JETS)

Key Takeaways

  • IPAY offers targeted exposure to global digital payments companies via the Nasdaq CTA Global Digital Payments Index, while JETS tracks the U.S. Global Jets Index for broader airline industry coverage including operators, manufacturers, and airports.
  • IPAY holds around 40 stocks with top holdings like SQ, V, and MA comprising over 50% of assets; JETS has about 50 holdings dominated by U.S. airlines such as DAL and AAL.
  • Expense ratios differ at 0.75% for IPAY versus 0.60% for JETS, giving JETS a cost advantage in this thematic matchup.
  • Both are passive, non-diversified, thematic ETFs with quarterly rebalancing, but IPAY emphasizes fintech transaction processing while JETS focuses on cyclical aviation risks like fuel costs and load factors.
  • IPAY provides more stable growth tied to e-commerce and digital wallets; JETS offers higher volatility linked to travel demand and economic cycles.
  • Diversification profiles vary: IPAY spans financial services and technology, JETS concentrates in industrials and consumer cyclical sectors.

Introduction

IPAY and JETS represent distinct thematic strategies within high-growth sectors: digital payments versus global aviation. While not direct competitors, both appeal to investors seeking exposure to structural shifts—IPAY to the cashless economy driven by smartphones and e-commerce, and JETS to post-pandemic travel recovery and airline efficiency. In today's environment of rising real-time payments, AI fraud detection, and resilient air traffic growth amid supply constraints, comparing these ETFs highlights alternative paths to sector-specific alpha. Investors weighing fintech stability against cyclical travel upside will find value in their differing risk-reward profiles, liquidity, and positioning amid macroeconomic rotations.

Amplify Digital Payments ETF (IPAY) Overview

The Amplify Digital Payments ETF (IPAY) is a passive, thematic ETF that seeks to track the Nasdaq CTA Global Digital Payments Index before fees and expenses. This market-cap-weighted benchmark targets companies deriving significant revenue from digital payments, including card networks, processors, infrastructure, software, and solutions providers. Launched in July 2015 and listed on NYSE Arca, IPAY holds approximately 40 stocks, with the top 10 accounting for over 54% of assets. Key holdings include SQ (Block Inc., ~6%), V (Visa Inc., ~6%), MA (Mastercard Inc., ~5.5%), AFRM (Affirm Holdings Inc., ~5.5%), and ADYEN (Adyen NV, ~5.5%). Sector allocations emphasize transaction processing (~78%), consumer finance (~12%), and exchanges (~5%), blending financial services and technology exposure.

IPAY's expense ratio stands at 0.75%, reflecting its specialized focus. As a non-diversified fund, it rebalances quarterly to maintain index alignment, employing full replication or sampling as needed. Distinguishing features include global reach across developed markets and sensitivity to e-commerce trends, though it carries risks from cybersecurity, regulation, and competition in fintech.

U.S. Global JETS ETF (JETS) Overview

The U.S. Global JETS ETF (JETS) is a passive, thematic ETF tracking the U.S. Global Jets Index prior to fees and expenses. This modified equal-weighted index captures global airline companies—passenger and cargo operators, manufacturers, airports, terminal services, and related media—using fundamental screens like market cap, trading volume, and load factors. Introduced in April 2015 on NYSE Arca, JETS features around 50 holdings, with top U.S. airlines capped at 10% each and internationals at lower weights. Prominent positions include DAL (Delta Air Lines, ~12%), AAL (American Airlines Group, ~11%), UAL (United Airlines, ~11%), and LUV (Southwest Airlines, ~10%). Sector breakdown tilts heavily to industrials (~89%) and consumer cyclical (~9%).

With a net expense ratio of 0.60%, JETS rebalances quarterly (March, June, September, December). As a non-diversified vehicle, it uses representative sampling and emphasizes efficient operators via quantamental methodology. Unique aspects include heavy U.S. focus (~75%) and exposure to aviation supply chains, tempered by fuel volatility, labor issues, and geopolitical risks.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The digital payments ecosystem benefits from accelerating trends like real-time settlements, AI-driven fraud prevention, stablecoins, and digital wallets projected to exceed 5 billion users globally. E-commerce expansion and embedded finance catalyze growth, though regulatory scrutiny on data privacy and competition from big tech pose risks. Meanwhile, aviation navigates sustained demand recovery, with passenger traffic forecasted at 4.9-5.8% growth in 2026 amid supply constraints (aircraft shortages, labor). Premium leisure and Asia-Pacific routes buoy airlines, supported by ancillary revenues and high load factors (~84%), but face headwinds from fuel costs, inflation, and geopolitical tensions. Both sectors exhibit resilience in a fragmented macro landscape of moderate GDP expansion and trade uncertainties.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent months through early 2026, IPAY has shown modest gains during payment processor rebounds but lagged broader markets amid buy-now-pay-later pressures and rate sensitivity, posting year-to-date declines around -9-10% and one-year returns near -11%. JETS exhibited higher volatility, with positive one-year momentum (~20-29%) fueled by travel cycles yet recent pullbacks from capacity rationalization and macro caution, including YTD variability. IPAY's lower beta reflects fintech's defensive tilt versus JETS' cyclical swings tied to fuel trends and load factors. Relative positioning favors IPAY in risk-off rotations to tech-enabled services, while JETS gains from leisure demand and yield discipline; volatility differences underscore IPAY's trend consistency against JETS' earnings sensitivity.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization (market cap), technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener identifies trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening, empowering data-driven decisions across asset classes. Explore it today to uncover hidden gems in sectors like payments or aviation.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors IPAY with moderate probability due to its superior diversification across stable fintech leaders, lower relative volatility, cost structure aligned with long-term digital transaction growth, and consistent trend capture amid e-commerce momentum. JETS trails on elevated cyclical risks despite cheaper fees and travel tailwinds, as IPAY's structural exposure better balances sector momentum and downside protection—not investment advice.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
IPAY vs. JETS commentary
Jun 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IPAY is a Hold and JETS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JETS has more net assets: 860M vs. IPAY (159M). JETS has a higher annual dividend yield than IPAY: JETS (-0.855) vs IPAY (-16.445). IPAY was incepted earlier than JETS: IPAY (11 years) vs JETS (11 years). JETS (0.60) has a lower expense ratio than IPAY (0.75). JETS has a higher turnover IPAY (29.00) vs IPAY (29.00).
IPAYJETSIPAY / JETS
Gain YTD-16.445-0.8551,923%
Net Assets159M860M18%
Total Expense Ratio0.750.60125%
Turnover29.0038.0076%
Yield0.880.79111%
Fund Existence11 years11 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IPAYJETS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
87%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IPAY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
JETS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NBNCX15.50N/A
N/A
Neuberger International Sel C
NRFYX12.02N/A
N/A
Natixis AEW Global Focused Real Estate Y
ACMTX12.46N/A
N/A
AB All Market Real Return C
DIAYX30.62N/A
N/A
Diamond Hill Long-Short Y
UBVVX84.04N/A
N/A
Undiscovered Managers Behavioral Val R5

IPAY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IPAY has been closely correlated with XYZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IPAY jumps, then XYZ could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IPAY
1D Price
Change %
IPAY100%
-4.17%
XYZ - IPAY
71%
Closely correlated
-5.87%
GPN - IPAY
71%
Closely correlated
-8.35%
TOST - IPAY
68%
Closely correlated
-4.86%
AFRM - IPAY
67%
Closely correlated
-6.68%
ACIW - IPAY
66%
Closely correlated
-4.92%
More

JETS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, JETS has been closely correlated with DAL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if JETS jumps, then DAL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JETS
1D Price
Change %
JETS100%
-2.35%
DAL - JETS
90%
Closely correlated
-1.55%
AAL - JETS
89%
Closely correlated
-2.58%
UAL - JETS
88%
Closely correlated
-3.38%
ALGT - JETS
85%
Closely correlated
-5.33%
LUV - JETS
82%
Closely correlated
-3.47%
More