IPAY
Price
$44.47
Change
+$0.99 (+2.28%)
Updated
Jun 4, 01:02 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
159.19M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
QCLN
Price
$67.41
Change
-$0.79 (-1.16%)
Updated
Jun 4, 01:27 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
923.76M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

IPAY vs QCLN

Header iconIPAY vs QCLN Comparison
Open Charts IPAY vs QCLNBanner chart's image
IPAY vs QCLN Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? Amplify Digital Payments ETF (IPAY) vs. First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN)

Key Takeaways

  • IPAY offers targeted exposure to global digital payments companies, tracking the Nasdaq CTA Global Digital Payments Index with 40+ holdings, while QCLN provides broader U.S.-focused clean energy coverage via the NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index with around 50 holdings.
  • IPAY's top holdings include payment giants like SQ (Block), V (Visa), and MA (Mastercard), emphasizing transaction processing (78% allocation); QCLN features clean tech leaders like BE (Bloom Energy) and ON (ON Semiconductor).
  • Expense ratios differ at 0.75% for IPAY versus 0.59% for QCLN, giving QCLN a cost advantage for long-term holding.
  • Both are passive thematic ETFs, but IPAY shows lower volatility (beta ~1.45) compared to QCLN's higher beta (~1.97), reflecting clean energy's sensitivity to policy and commodity cycles.
  • IPAY leans toward financial services and technology sectors; QCLN spans technology, industrials, and utilities in renewables and energy storage.
  • Recent market cycles highlight QCLN's higher beta to growth trends like AI power demand, contrasting IPAY's ties to consumer spending resilience.

Introduction

In today's evolving market, thematic ETFs like the Amplify Digital Payments ETF (IPAY) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN) offer investors targeted exposure to high-growth sectors. IPAY captures the shift to digital transactions amid rising e-commerce and mobile payments, while QCLN taps into the global push for sustainable energy solutions. Though not direct competitors, both appeal to those seeking alternatives to broad market indices, providing diversification within fintech and clean tech themes. Comparing them reveals structural differences in geographic focus, holdings concentration, and sensitivity to macroeconomic drivers like interest rates and policy shifts, aiding portfolio positioning in a sector-rotating environment.

Amplify Digital Payments ETF (IPAY) Overview

The Amplify Digital Payments ETF (IPAY) is a passive thematic ETF issued by Amplify ETFs, seeking to correspond to the total return of the Nasdaq CTA Global Digital Payments Index (ticker: WALLET) before fees. This index targets companies providing payments-related products and services, including card networks, processors, infrastructure, software, and solutions. The fund holds approximately 40 stocks, with top 10 comprising over 50% of assets for concentrated exposure. Key holdings include SQ (Block Inc., ~6%), V (Visa Inc., ~6%), MA (Mastercard Inc., ~5.5%), Adyen NV (~5.5%), and Affirm Holdings Inc. (~5.5%).

Sector allocations emphasize transaction and payment processing services (~78%), consumer finance (~12%), and financial exchanges (~5%), with a blend of technology (~55%) and financial services (~41%). The expense ratio is 0.75%. IPAY is non-diversified, rebalanced quarterly, and offers global reach with ~80% U.S. and international exposure via ADRs and GDRs (American Depositary Receipts and Global Depositary Receipts). Its structure suits investors eyeing durable fintech disruption trends.

First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN) Overview

The First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN) is a passive ETF from First Trust Advisors, designed to track the NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index. This index includes U.S.-listed companies in clean energy sub-sectors like advanced materials, energy intelligence, storage, conversion, and renewable electricity generation (solar, wind, etc.), requiring at least 50% revenue from these activities. The fund maintains ~52 holdings, with top 10 accounting for ~60% of assets. Leading positions feature BE (Bloom Energy Corp., ~11%), ON (ON Semiconductor Corp., ~10%), MPWR (Monolithic Power Systems Inc., ~9%), TSLA (Tesla Inc., ~6-7%), and FSLR (First Solar Inc., ~6%).

Sector breakdown tilts toward technology (~40-60%, semiconductors and electronics), industrials (~10-12%), consumer cyclical (EVs, ~19%), and utilities (~10%). The expense ratio stands at 0.59%. QCLN rebalances quarterly and reconstitutes semi-annually, focusing on mid- and large-cap U.S. firms (with minor foreign via listings), positioning it for clean energy innovation and infrastructure buildout.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The digital payments sector powering IPAY benefits from persistent e-commerce growth, contactless adoption, and embedded finance, fueled by macroeconomic resilience in consumer spending despite rate fluctuations. Capital flows favor established networks amid regulatory scrutiny on fintech (e.g., data privacy) and geopolitical stability supporting global trade. Conversely, QCLN's clean energy theme rides tailwinds from policy incentives like the U.S. Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), escalating electricity demand from AI data centers, and elevated oil prices enhancing renewables' appeal. Sector risks include supply chain vulnerabilities for solar/batteries, policy reversals post-elections, and financing costs tied to interest rates. Both themes align with secular shifts—digitization and decarbonization—but face cyclical pressures from economic slowdowns and commodity volatility.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

Over recent months, IPAY has exhibited steadier navigation through market cycles, with YTD returns around -10% and one-year around -11%, reflecting resilience in payment volumes but drags from buy-now-pay-later (BNPL) slowdowns and consumer finance sensitivity to rates. Its beta of ~1.45 indicates moderate volatility, outperforming in risk-off rotations toward defensive fintech. QCLN, with a higher beta (~1.97), has shown sharper swings, posting stronger gains in renewable rallies driven by AI power needs and policy flows but amplified losses in high-rate environments. Relative positioning favors QCLN amid sector momentum in clean tech infrastructure, while IPAY holds edge in diversification and lower drawdowns during earnings cycles for top holdings like Visa and Mastercard. Volatility differences underscore IPAY's cyclical stability versus QCLN's growth-beta profile.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization (market cap), technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener identifies trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening, empowering data-driven decisions across asset classes. Explore it today to uncover hidden gems in sectors like payments or clean energy.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors QCLN with moderate probability (~60%) due to its lower expense ratio, stronger trend consistency in recent clean energy momentum tied to AI infrastructure demand, and broader diversification across renewables sub-sectors. IPAY's solid structural exposure to digital payments offers cost-competitive positioning, but elevated fees and softer relative performance amid sector rotation tilt the edge to QCLN for observers of observable macro tailwinds. This assessment reflects current factors; monitor for shifts in policy or consumer trends.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
IPAY vs. QCLN commentary
Jun 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IPAY is a Hold and QCLN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QCLN has more net assets: 924M vs. IPAY (159M). QCLN has a higher annual dividend yield than IPAY: QCLN (52.940) vs IPAY (-16.445). IPAY was incepted earlier than QCLN: IPAY (11 years) vs QCLN (19 years). QCLN (0.59) has a lower expense ratio than IPAY (0.75). IPAY has a higher turnover QCLN (23.00) vs QCLN (23.00).
IPAYQCLNIPAY / QCLN
Gain YTD-16.44552.940-31%
Net Assets159M924M17%
Total Expense Ratio0.750.59127%
Turnover29.0023.00126%
Yield0.880.15582%
Fund Existence11 years19 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IPAYQCLN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IPAY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
QCLN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VCIEX10.32N/A
N/A
VALIC Company I International Eqs Idx
FLUIX30.57N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Stk Selec Lg Cp Val I
FCIGX41.55N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth I
GQHIX14.26N/A
N/A
GQG Partners US Quality Value Fund Ins
TGBLX12.57N/A
N/A
T. Rowe Price Global Impact Equity I

IPAY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IPAY has been closely correlated with XYZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IPAY jumps, then XYZ could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IPAY
1D Price
Change %
IPAY100%
-4.17%
XYZ - IPAY
71%
Closely correlated
-5.87%
GPN - IPAY
71%
Closely correlated
-8.35%
TOST - IPAY
68%
Closely correlated
-4.86%
AFRM - IPAY
67%
Closely correlated
-6.68%
ACIW - IPAY
66%
Closely correlated
-4.92%
More