IPGDF
Price
$2.70
Change
-$0.05 (-1.82%)
Updated
Jul 1 closing price
Capitalization
7.18B
IPMLF
Price
$3.58
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
296.76M
Interact to see
Advertisement

IPGDF vs IPMLF

Header iconIPGDF vs IPMLF Comparison
Open Charts IPGDF vs IPMLFBanner chart's image
IGO
Price$2.70
Change-$0.05 (-1.82%)
Volume$35K
Capitalization7.18B
Imperial Metals
Price$3.58
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$5.92K
Capitalization296.76M
IPGDF vs IPMLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
IPGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IPMLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IPGDF vs. IPMLF commentary
Jul 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IPGDF is a StrongBuy and IPMLF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 03, 2025
Stock price -- (IPGDF: $2.70 vs. IPMLF: $3.58)
Brand notoriety: IPGDF and IPMLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IPGDF: 769% vs. IPMLF: 49%
Market capitalization -- IPGDF: $7.18B vs. IPMLF: $296.76M
IPGDF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $7.18B. IPMLF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $296.76M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.08B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IPGDF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileIPMLF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • IPGDF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • IPMLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both IPGDF and IPMLF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IPGDF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IPMLF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IPGDF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • IPMLF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both IPGDF and IPMLF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

IPGDF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -1.82% price change this week, while IPMLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +0.34% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.00%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.75% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IPGDF($7.18B) has a higher market cap than IPMLF($297M). IPMLF YTD gains are higher at: 186.046 vs. IPGDF (-12.903). IPGDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.26B vs. IPMLF (-37.23M). IPGDF has more cash in the bank: 494M vs. IPMLF (34.8M). IPMLF has less debt than IPGDF: IPMLF (228M) vs IPGDF (947M). IPGDF has higher revenues than IPMLF: IPGDF (1.02B) vs IPMLF (232M).
IPGDFIPMLFIPGDF / IPMLF
Capitalization7.18B297M2,418%
EBITDA1.26B-37.23M-3,385%
Gain YTD-12.903186.046-7%
P/E Ratio12.74N/A-
Revenue1.02B232M439%
Total Cash494M34.8M1,420%
Total Debt947M228M415%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IPGDF vs IPMLF: Fundamental Ratings
IPGDF
IPMLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6867
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
18
Undervalued
98
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10058
SMR RATING
1..100
9045
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6235
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
196
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5065

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IPGDF's Valuation (18) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for IPMLF (98). This means that IPGDF’s stock grew significantly faster than IPMLF’s over the last 12 months.

IPMLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (58) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IPGDF (100). This means that IPMLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than IPGDF’s over the last 12 months.

IPMLF's SMR Rating (45) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IPGDF (90). This means that IPMLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than IPGDF’s over the last 12 months.

IPMLF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as IPGDF (62). This means that IPMLF’s stock grew similarly to IPGDF’s over the last 12 months.

IPGDF's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for IPMLF (96). This means that IPGDF’s stock grew significantly faster than IPMLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IPGDFIPMLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IPGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IPMLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CBTJ27.390.67
+2.51%
Calamos Bitcoin 80 Str Alt Prt ETF-Jan
JNUG80.611.39
+1.75%
Direxion Daily Jr Gld Mnrs Bull 2X ETF
SPD38.130.46
+1.21%
Simplify US Equity PLUS Dwnsd Cnvxty ETF
ITDI34.580.15
+0.44%
iShares LifePath Target Date 2065 ETF
DFSU39.660.11
+0.28%
Dimensional US Sustainability Core 1 ETF

IPGDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IPGDF has been loosely correlated with IIDDY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IPGDF jumps, then IIDDY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IPGDF
1D Price
Change %
IPGDF100%
N/A
IIDDY - IPGDF
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
MALRY - IPGDF
32%
Poorly correlated
+3.90%
PMETF - IPGDF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LYSDY - IPGDF
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.81%
RTNTF - IPGDF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.26%
More

IPMLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IPMLF and AXREF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IPMLF and AXREF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IPMLF
1D Price
Change %
IPMLF100%
-0.20%
AXREF - IPMLF
24%
Poorly correlated
+4.74%
ECRAF - IPMLF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.50%
SHTLF - IPMLF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IVPAF - IPMLF
18%
Poorly correlated
+2.09%
IPGDF - IPMLF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More