This comparison examines IR (Ingersoll Rand Inc.) and JCI (Johnson Controls International plc), two companies with significant exposure to industrial equipment, building systems, and energy efficiency themes. The analysis focuses on recent price behavior, business fundamentals, and market positioning to assist investors and traders evaluating relative opportunities in the industrial and infrastructure sectors. Both stocks appeal to those seeking exposure to long-term trends in decarbonization and operational efficiency, while differing in growth trajectories and risk profiles amid evolving economic conditions.
Ingersoll Rand Inc. (IR) provides mission-critical flow creation and industrial technologies, including air and gas compression, vacuum systems, and fluid management solutions. The company serves diverse end markets such as manufacturing, energy, and infrastructure. In recent market activity, IR shares have traded near $84, reflecting year-to-date gains of approximately 6.6% as of late July 2026. Performance has been influenced by steady but measured demand in industrial segments, with investors monitoring upcoming second-quarter earnings expected on July 30. Sentiment remains tempered relative to broader market gains, supported by the company’s established market position but tempered by slower growth visibility compared with peers benefiting from specialized high-demand applications.
Johnson Controls International plc (JCI) delivers building technologies and solutions focused on heating, ventilation, air conditioning (HVAC), fire and security systems, and energy management. The company emphasizes thermal management and decarbonization, with notable exposure to data centers and mission-critical facilities. As of late July 2026, shares traded near $143, delivering year-to-date advances exceeding 20% and one-year returns around 30%. Recent market activity has been supported by analyst upgrades and raised long-term growth targets, alongside anticipation of fiscal third-quarter results due July 29. Sentiment has strengthened on the back of robust backlog growth and positioning in high-growth end markets, contributing to relative outperformance versus broader industrial benchmarks in recent weeks.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of high-performing AI trading bots drawn from hundreds available across the platform. These bots execute trades on thousands of different tickers using varied strategies, timeframes, and performance metrics tailored to current market conditions. Only the most suitable and statistically robust bots earn placement in this section, reflecting differences in risk-adjusted returns, win rates, and drawdown profiles. The featured bots demonstrate a range of approaches, from short-term momentum tactics to longer-horizon trend-following systems, allowing users to explore options aligned with individual preferences. For additional details on the latest trending selections and performance statistics, visit Trending AI Robots.
IR and JCI both operate within industrial and building-related sectors yet diverge in primary growth drivers. JCI derives greater momentum from data center cooling and energy-efficiency solutions, supporting stronger recent price appreciation and analyst optimism. In contrast, IR emphasizes broader industrial compression technologies, offering more diversified but slower-growing end-market exposure. Risk factors include valuation multiples, with JCI commanding higher price-to-earnings ratios reflective of its growth profile, while IR presents a comparatively more moderate valuation. Sector exposure overlaps in sustainability themes, though JCI shows heightened sensitivity to technology infrastructure spending. Market sentiment currently favors JCI’s trajectory, creating a trade-off between stability at IR and accelerated positioning at JCI ahead of earnings.
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency and relative positioning in recent market activity, Tickeron’s AI models would currently assign a probabilistic preference to JCI. Stronger year-to-date momentum, favorable analyst revisions, and alignment with high-demand applications in thermal management contribute to this edge. IR maintains solid fundamentals and lower volatility characteristics that could support outperformance in defensive scenarios. The assessment remains conditional on upcoming earnings outcomes and broader market dynamics, reflecting relative probabilities rather than absolute conclusions.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
IR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileJCI’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
IR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while JCI’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
IR (@Industrial Machinery) experienced а +4.65% price change this week, while JCI (@Building Products) price change was +7.42% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was +4.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.73%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.32%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Building Products industry was +8.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.99%.
IR is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.
JCI is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2026.
The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.
@Building Products (+8.97% weekly)The industry manufactures products used in the construction of residential and commercial buildings. The process involves using materials and other products, and processing them to create finished items such as doors, windows, light fittings, floor coverings, climate control products and other building components and home improvement products. Masco Corporation, Allegion PLC and Lennox International Inc. are major manufacturers of such products.
| IR | JCI | IR / JCI | |
| Capitalization | 33.7B | 92.2B | 37% |
| EBITDA | 2B | 3.7B | 54% |
| Gain YTD | 11.442 | 29.817 | 38% |
| P/E Ratio | 35.94 | 42.88 | 84% |
| Revenue | 7.94B | 25B | 32% |
| Total Cash | 1.17B | 641M | 183% |
| Total Debt | 4.83B | 9.48B | 51% |
IR | JCI | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 33 | 31 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 66 Overvalued | 63 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 12 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 75 | 40 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | 16 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 89 | 30 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
JCI's Valuation (63) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as IR (66) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means that JCI’s stock grew similarly to IR’s over the last 12 months.
JCI's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IR (50) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means that JCI’s stock grew somewhat faster than IR’s over the last 12 months.
JCI's SMR Rating (40) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IR (75) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means that JCI’s stock grew somewhat faster than IR’s over the last 12 months.
JCI's Price Growth Rating (16) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as IR (45) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means that JCI’s stock grew similarly to IR’s over the last 12 months.
JCI's P/E Growth Rating (30) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IR (89) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means that JCI’s stock grew somewhat faster than IR’s over the last 12 months.
| IR | JCI | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 56% | 1 day ago 59% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 45% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 60% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% | 1 day ago 61% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% | 1 day ago 62% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% | 1 day ago 59% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 66% | 4 days ago 61% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 58% | 11 days ago 56% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 50% | 1 day ago 67% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% | 1 day ago 58% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IR has been closely correlated with JCI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IR jumps, then JCI could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, JCI has been closely correlated with IR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if JCI jumps, then IR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To JCI | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JCI | 100% | +0.59% | ||
| IR - JCI | 77% Closely correlated | -1.96% | ||
| TT - JCI | 73% Closely correlated | -1.02% | ||
| CARR - JCI | 55% Loosely correlated | -2.25% | ||
| SPXC - JCI | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.36% | ||
| TREX - JCI | 44% Loosely correlated | -2.30% | ||
More | ||||