Advertisement
IR vs PH
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Ingersoll Rand (IR) vs. Parker Hannifin (PH) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- IR (Ingersoll Rand) is a smaller, acquisition-driven industrial focused on flow-creation, compressed air, and life-science technologies, while PH (Parker Hannifin) is a larger diversified motion-and-control leader with a fast-growing aerospace and defense franchise.
- Recent quarters show a contrast in momentum: Parker Hannifin posted record sales, margin, and backlog figures, whereas Ingersoll Rand delivered headline growth but softer organic (internally generated) results.
- Both companies rely heavily on aftermarket and recurring revenue, but Parker's aerospace exposure and record order book currently provide a stronger cyclical tailwind.
- Relative performance has diverged, with PH's shares showing significantly stronger 12-month gains than IR's amid tariff and margin pressure at Ingersoll Rand.
- Valuation and risk profiles differ materially, making this a useful comparison for investors weighing growth quality against price.
Introduction
Industrial investors frequently weigh two very different blue-chip machinery franchises: Ingersoll Rand (IR) and Parker Hannifin (PH). Although both manufacture mission-critical equipment and generate substantial aftermarket income, their scale, end markets, and recent momentum differ sharply. Ingersoll Rand is a mid-cap specialist in compressors, vacuum, and life-science solutions, while Parker Hannifin is a Fortune 250 motion-and-control conglomerate increasingly levered to aerospace and defense. This stock comparison is most relevant to investors evaluating relative performance, market positioning, and how two well-run industrial compounders stack up in the current environment.
IR Overview and Recent Performance
Ingersoll Rand Inc. (IR) provides mission-critical flow-creation and industrial technologies, including compressors, pumps, vacuums, blowers, and power tools, alongside a Precision & Science Technologies segment serving life-sciences and medical customers. The company has built its growth around a disciplined, bolt-on M&A (mergers and acquisitions) strategy, with management recently citing a funnel of more than 200 potential deals.
In recent market activity, Ingersoll Rand has reported solid headline results that masked softer organic performance. In its most recent quarterly updates, revenue rose roughly 8% year over year, but much of that gain came from currency translation and acquisitions, while organic orders declined slightly and adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) margins compressed. Investors reacted cautiously to these results, with shares retreating from a 52-week high of just over $100 as the market focused on organic weakness and tariff-related cost pressure. A book-to-bill ratio above 1.0 and stabilizing compressor demand have provided some support, but sentiment has remained more defensive than at Parker Hannifin.
PH Overview and Recent Performance
Parker Hannifin Corporation (PH) is a global leader in motion and control technologies, operating through two segments: Diversified Industrial and Aerospace Systems. Aerospace and defense now represent its largest market vertical, and its portfolio is split roughly two-thirds commercial and one-third defense. Parker has supplemented organic growth with large acquisitions, including Meggitt, Filtration Group, and the announced purchase of CIRCOR's commercial and defense aerospace business.
Parker's recent performance has been notably strong. The company has reported record sales, adjusted segment operating margins, and earnings per share (EPS), along with a record backlog that climbed above $12 billion and cash flow from operations that surpassed $4 billion in its latest fiscal year. Orders have grown at a high single-digit pace, led by double-digit aerospace demand. Parker also raised its quarterly dividend by 11%, marking roughly 70 consecutive fiscal years of increases. This consistent execution has supported robust share-price gains over the past year and generally buoyant investor sentiment.
Trending AI Robots
For traders seeking a data-driven edge, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page curates a selection of the platform's most relevant automated trading strategies for current market conditions. Tickeron maintains hundreds of AI Trading Bots that trade thousands of different tickers, each with its own trading style, timeframe, strategy, performance statistics, and set of covered securities. Because not every bot suits every market regime, only the best-performing and most appropriate robots earn a place in this featured section. The bots span varied approaches, from swing and day trading to longer-horizon strategies, offering traders a range of risk and return profiles. Explore the Trending AI Robots page to identify automated strategies aligned with your objectives.
Head-to-Head Comparison
The clearest contrast between these two stocks is scale and end-market mix. Parker Hannifin generates roughly $21 billion in annual revenue with a diversified motion-and-control base and a high-growth aerospace franchise, while Ingersoll Rand is smaller, with annual revenue in the high single-digit billions and greater exposure to industrial short-cycle demand and life sciences. Parker's aerospace backlog gives it longer-cycle, higher-visibility growth, whereas Ingersoll Rand is more sensitive to factory activity, tariffs, and near-term order timing.
On momentum, Parker Hannifin has shown stronger order growth, record backlog, and expanding margins, while Ingersoll Rand has leaned more on acquisitions and currency to sustain headline growth. Risk profiles differ too: Ingersoll Rand faces margin pressure from tariffs and organic softness, while Parker carries a premium valuation and some exposure to aerospace cycle risk. Both companies offer recurring aftermarket revenue, but the current market positioning favors Parker's more diversified, higher-margin portfolio.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable trend consistency, momentum, and relative positioning, Tickeron's AI would likely favor PH over IR in the current environment. Parker Hannifin's combination of record backlog, positive order momentum, expanding margins, and robust cash-flow generation reflects a more consistent upward trend, while Ingersoll Rand's softer organic growth and margin compression introduce greater near-term uncertainty. That said, the AI's assessment remains probabilistic rather than definitive; shifts in industrial demand, tariff policy, or aerospace spending could narrow or widen the gap. Traders should monitor trend signals and order data for both names as conditions evolve.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IR is a StrongBuy and PH is a Hold.
IR's RSI Indicator recovers from oversold territory
The RSI Indicator for IR moved out of oversold territory on September 21, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is shifting from a downward trend to an upward trend. Traders may want to buy the stock or call options. The A.I.dvisor looked at 35 similar instances when the indicator left oversold territory. In 24 of the 35 cases the stock moved higher. This puts the odds of a move higher at 69%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The Stochastic Oscillator is in the oversold zone. Keep an eye out for a move up in the foreseeable future.
The 10-day moving average for IR crossed bullishly above the 50-day moving average on October 15, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted higher and could be considered a buy signal. In 9 of 14 past instances when the 10-day crossed above the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 64%.
Following a +1.69% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where IR advanced for three days, in 210 of 320 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 66%.
IR may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 179 of 269 cases where IR Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 67%.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 22, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on IR as a result. In 45 of 86 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 52%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for IR turned negative on October 22, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 50 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 29 of the 50 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 58%.
IR moved below its 50-day moving average on October 22, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where IR declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 59%.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 59 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. IR’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 63 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (2.801) is normal, around the industry mean (4.140). P/E Ratio (30.239) is within average values for comparable stocks, (37.318). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.619) is also within normal values, averaging (1.879). Dividend Yield (0.001) settles around the average of (0.032) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (3.547) is also within normal values, averaging (186.943).
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 65 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating well-balanced risk and returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 76, placing this stock slightly better than average.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 73 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 85 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 89 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
PH's RSI Indicator is remaining in oversold zone for 1 day
It is expected that a price bounce should occur soon.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The Stochastic Oscillator is in the oversold zone. Keep an eye out for a move up in the foreseeable future.
Following a +0.47% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where PH advanced for three days, in 241 of 340 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 71%.
PH may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 226 of 321 cases where PH Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 70%.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 22, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on PH as a result. In 43 of 89 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 48%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for PH turned negative on October 20, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 53 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 21 of the 53 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 40%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where PH declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 48%.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 8 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating low risk on high returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 76, placing this stock better than average.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 26 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 38 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 58 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. PH’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 88 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (7.209) is normal, around the industry mean (4.140). P/E Ratio (30.480) is within average values for comparable stocks, (37.318). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (3.247) is also within normal values, averaging (1.879). Dividend Yield (0.009) settles around the average of (0.032) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (5.473) is also within normal values, averaging (186.943).
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 95 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
IR | PH | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 77 | 21 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 63 Fair valued | 88 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 65 | 8 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 73 | 38 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | 58 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 89 | 26 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 90 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
IR's Valuation (63) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as PH (88) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that IR’s stock grew similarly to PH’s over the last 12 months.
PH's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the Industrial Machinery industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IR (65) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means that PH’s stock grew somewhat faster than IR’s over the last 12 months.
PH's SMR Rating (38) in the Industrial Machinery industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IR (73) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means that PH’s stock grew somewhat faster than IR’s over the last 12 months.
PH's Price Growth Rating (58) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as IR (59) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means that PH’s stock grew similarly to IR’s over the last 12 months.
PH's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the Industrial Machinery industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IR (89) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means that PH’s stock grew somewhat faster than IR’s over the last 12 months.
| IR | PH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 69% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 71% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 52% | 1 day ago 48% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 58% | 1 day ago 40% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 61% | 1 day ago 56% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% | 1 day ago 60% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 66% | 6 days ago 71% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 59% | 1 day ago 48% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% | 1 day ago 65% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 70% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
IR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while PH’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- IR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- PH’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
IR’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PH’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- IR’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- PH’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
IR (@Industrial Machinery) experienced а -5.53% price change this week, while PH (@Industrial Machinery) price change was -8.59% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was -5.73%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -17.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was -22.38%.
Reported Earning Dates
IR is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.
PH is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Industrial Machinery (-5.73% weekly)The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.
Advertisement
IR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IR has been closely correlated with JCI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IR jumps, then JCI could also see price increases.
PH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PH has been closely correlated with ATMU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PH jumps, then ATMU could also see price increases.