Advertisement
IR vs PH
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Ingersoll Rand (IR) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- IR (Ingersoll Rand) has underperformed the broader market over the past year, declining roughly 6%, while PH (Parker-Hannifin) has surged approximately 33% over the same period.
- Parker-Hannifin's market capitalization of roughly $120 billion is nearly four times larger than Ingersoll Rand's $32 billion, reflecting significantly broader scale and diversification.
- Both companies reported earnings beats in their most recent quarters, but PH demonstrated stronger momentum with 9% order growth and a record backlog of $12.5 billion.
- IR trades at a considerably higher trailing P/E (price-to-earnings) ratio of roughly 55x compared to PH at approximately 35x, despite weaker near-term earnings trajectory.
- PH has raised its dividend for 70 consecutive fiscal years, while IR offers a nominal dividend yield of just 0.10%, underscoring divergent capital-return priorities.
- Analyst consensus rates both stocks favorably, though the average price target for IR implies a larger percentage upside from current levels than PH's target does.
Introduction
This stock comparison examines IR (Ingersoll Rand Inc.) and PH (Parker-Hannifin Corporation), two prominent names in the industrial machinery and motion-control sectors. Both companies serve mission-critical roles across manufacturing, aerospace, energy, and life sciences end markets, yet they differ markedly in scale, recent market positioning, and growth trajectory. For investors evaluating industrial exposure—whether seeking stability, growth at a reasonable price, or exposure to secular trends such as automation, aerospace aftermarket strength, and infrastructure spending—understanding how these two stocks compare on relative performance, valuation, and business momentum is essential. This article provides a data-driven, side-by-side analysis of both names in the current market environment.
IR Overview and Recent Performance
IR (Ingersoll Rand), headquartered in Davidson, North Carolina, is a global provider of mission-critical flow creation and industrial technologies. The company operates through two segments: Industrial Technologies and Services (IT&S), which encompasses air compressors, vacuum systems, blowers, power tools, and lifting equipment; and Precision and Science Technologies (P&ST), which supplies precision pumps, liquid-handling systems, and gas compression solutions for life sciences, aerospace, defense, and industrial applications. Ingersoll Rand has built its growth strategy around its proprietary operating framework—Ingersoll Rand Execution Excellence (IRX)—and an active M&A (mergers and acquisitions) pipeline.
In recent market activity, IR shares have traded in a wide range between roughly $68 and $101 over the past 52 weeks, with the stock currently sitting closer to the lower end of that band. The company's first-quarter 2026 results, reported in late April, showed reported orders of $1.98 billion (up 5% year over year) and revenues of $1.85 billion (up 8%). Adjusted EPS (earnings per share) of $0.77 beat consensus estimates by $0.03. However, organic revenue declined 2% in the IT&S segment, and adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) margins contracted modestly in that division. Management maintained full-year guidance and noted that the book-to-bill ratio exceeded 1.0 for the first full year since 2022, signaling a potential inflection in demand. Despite these green shoots, the stock has lagged the S&P 500 and the industrial sector broadly over the trailing year, with investor sentiment weighed down by decelerating organic growth, persistent valuation premium, and uneven end-market demand.
PH Overview and Recent Performance
PH (Parker-Hannifin), headquartered in Cleveland, Ohio, is the global leader in motion and control technologies, with a diversified portfolio spanning aerospace, fluid power, electromechanical, filtration, and climate-control systems. The company reports through two primary segments: Diversified Industrial (split into North America and International businesses) and Aerospace Systems. Parker-Hannifin is known for its "Win Strategy" operating philosophy, a disciplined approach to margin expansion, cash flow generation, and capital deployment that has underpinned decades of consistent shareholder returns.
Over the past year, PH has delivered standout relative performance, gaining approximately 33% and significantly outpacing both the S&P 500 and the broader industrial sector. In its fiscal 2026 third quarter (ended March 31, 2026), the company posted record sales of $5.5 billion, representing 11% reported growth and 6.5% organic growth. Adjusted EPS of $8.17 surged 18% year over year and exceeded consensus expectations. Orders grew 9% company-wide, led by a 14% increase in the Aerospace Systems segment. The backlog reached a record $12.5 billion, providing strong visibility into future revenue. The company raised its full-year outlook to mid-teens adjusted EPS growth and announced an 11% dividend increase, extending its remarkable streak of 70 consecutive fiscal years of dividend growth—one of the longest such records among publicly traded U.S. industrials.
Trending AI Robots
For traders seeking a data-driven edge in stock selection, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated hub of AI-powered trading bots designed to adapt to evolving market conditions. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI trading bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers across equities, ETFs, and forex, yet only a select subset earns a place in the Trending AI Robots section. These top-ranked bots employ varied trading styles—ranging from short-term swing trading to trend-following strategies—and are distinguished by their real-time performance statistics, win rates, and risk profiles. Some bots have demonstrated annualized returns well into double digits, with trade accuracy metrics that offer transparency into their historical consistency. Each bot operates on clearly defined timeframes and ticker universes, allowing traders to align a bot's strategy with their own risk tolerance and objectives. To explore which AI strategies are currently generating the strongest signals in this market, visit the Trending AI Robots page.
Head-to-Head Comparison
Although IR and PH operate in adjacent industrial markets, they diverge meaningfully across multiple investment dimensions. In terms of scale, PH's roughly $120 billion market cap and $21 billion in trailing revenue dwarf IR's $32 billion market cap and $7.8 billion in revenue. PH's broader diversification—spanning aerospace, industrial, and aftermarket verticals—has provided more resilient growth during recent quarters, while IR's more concentrated exposure to compression, vacuum, and precision pump markets has left it more vulnerable to uneven industrial demand.
Valuation presents a notable contrast. IR trades at a trailing P/E of approximately 55x, a significant premium to PH's roughly 35x multiple, even though PH has delivered substantially stronger earnings growth and more consistent operational execution. IR's forward P/E of roughly 23x narrows this gap somewhat, reflecting expectations of an earnings recovery, but the stock's premium on a trailing basis underscores the market's patience being tested. On capital returns, PH's $8.00 annual dividend and 70-year growth streak stand in stark relief to IR's $0.08 annual payout, which yields just 0.10%. PH also repurchased $275 million in shares during its most recent quarter, reinforcing its commitment to returning capital.
From a momentum standpoint, PH's +33% one-year return and consistent earnings beats reflect strong trend continuity, while IR's negative one-year return and recent pullback of roughly 18% from its 52-week high suggest a stock still searching for a catalyst. Risk factors differ as well: IR's elevated M&A activity introduces integration risk, while PH's record backlog and diversified revenue base provide greater near-term earnings visibility. Both stocks carry moderate beta levels—IR at 1.17 and PH at 1.11—indicating slightly above-average sensitivity to broader market movements.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable trend consistency, earnings momentum, and relative market positioning, Tickeron's AI would likely favor PH (Parker-Hannifin) in the current environment. PH's combination of accelerating organic growth, record backlog, expanding margins, a 70-year dividend growth track record, and strong relative performance against both the S&P 500 and its industrial peers suggests a more durable bullish trend. IR's improving book-to-bill ratio, compelling analyst upside potential, and pullback from highs present an intriguing contrarian setup, but the stock's elevated trailing valuation, softer organic growth, and weaker relative momentum create a higher degree of uncertainty in trend-following models. That said, AI-driven assessments are probabilistic by nature—if IR's order recovery translates into sustained earnings acceleration and the stock begins to establish a higher-low pattern, the comparative calculus could shift. In the current snapshot, PH's combination of fundamental momentum and trend strength makes it the more probable near-to-medium-term leader in this pairing.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
Disclaimers and LimitationsTo compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IR is a StrongBuy and PH is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
IR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePH’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- IR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- PH’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
IR’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PH’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- IR’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- PH’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
IR (@Industrial Machinery) experienced а +5.56% price change this week, while PH (@Industrial Machinery) price change was +1.87% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was -2.59%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -9.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.54%.
Reported Earning Dates
IR is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
PH is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Industrial Machinery (-2.59% weekly)The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.
| IR | PH | IR / PH | |
| Capitalization | 32.7B | 122B | 27% |
| EBITDA | 1.69B | 5.63B | 30% |
| Gain YTD | 5.506 | 10.901 | 51% |
| P/E Ratio | 56.45 | 35.82 | 158% |
| Revenue | 7.78B | 21B | 37% |
| Total Cash | 1.27B | 476M | 268% |
| Total Debt | 4.84B | 9.58B | 51% |
IR | PH | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 21 | 67 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 75 Overvalued | 78 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 7 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 57 | 37 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 23 | 26 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
IR's Valuation (75) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as PH (78) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that IR’s stock grew similarly to PH’s over the last 12 months.
PH's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the Industrial Machinery industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IR (50) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means that PH’s stock grew somewhat faster than IR’s over the last 12 months.
PH's SMR Rating (100) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as IR (100) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means that PH’s stock grew similarly to IR’s over the last 12 months.
PH's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as IR (57) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means that PH’s stock grew similarly to IR’s over the last 12 months.
IR's P/E Growth Rating (23) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as PH (26) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that IR’s stock grew similarly to PH’s over the last 12 months.
| IR | PH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | 2 days ago 51% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 70% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 46% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 57% | 4 days ago 47% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 46% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 61% |
Advertisement
IR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IR has been closely correlated with JCI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IR jumps, then JCI could also see price increases.
PH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PH has been closely correlated with IR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PH jumps, then IR could also see price increases.