IR
Price
$78.00
Change
+$0.76 (+0.98%)
Updated
Oct 8 closing price
Capitalization
29.64B
26 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TT
Price
$469.94
Change
+$2.67 (+0.57%)
Updated
Oct 8 closing price
Capitalization
99.46B
26 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

IR vs TT

IR vs TT Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Sep 28, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Ingersoll Rand (IR) vs. Trane Technologies (TT) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • IR (Ingersoll Rand) is a diversified industrial provider of flow-creation, compression, and life-sciences technologies, while TT (Trane Technologies) is a climate-focused leader in heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) and refrigeration.
  • Both companies reported record or near-record order activity in recent quarters, but TT has shown markedly stronger booking and backlog momentum tied to data-center cooling demand.
  • IR faces near-term margin compression, partly from pricing pressure in China, while TT is managing inflation-driven margin pressure against a much larger order funnel.
  • The two stocks differ sharply in valuation, growth profile, and market positioning, making them a useful pairing for investors weighing industrial diversification against climate-infrastructure exposure.

Introduction

Ingersoll Rand and Trane Technologies are both widely followed industrial names, yet they occupy different corners of the market. Ingersoll Rand supplies mission-critical flow creation, compression, and life-sciences equipment across dozens of brands, while Trane Technologies focuses on HVAC, building controls, and transport refrigeration under its Trane and Thermo King brands. This stock comparison is especially relevant for investors and traders evaluating how a diversified industrial compounder stacks up against a climate-innovation leader benefiting directly from surging data-center cooling demand. Understanding their relative performance, growth drivers, and market positioning can help clarify which business model is better suited to the current environment.

IR Overview and Recent Performance

Ingersoll Rand operates across two principal segments: Industrial Technologies & Services, which provides compressors, blowers, and vacuum equipment, and Precision & Science Technologies, which serves life-sciences and specialty markets. In recent quarters, the company has delivered steady top-line growth alongside modestly pressured profitability. In its most recent reporting period, revenue rose roughly 8% year over year, supported by organic growth and contributions from acquisitions, while orders increased in the mid-single digits. However, adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) margin contracted as pricing in China, commercial investments, and higher corporate costs weighed on results. Recurring aftermarket revenue, which now represents more than a third of sales, continues to support the company's stability narrative, but near-term organic order growth has been more muted than the headline figures suggest. Sentiment has reflected this mixed picture, with the stock trading in a range as investors weigh margin resilience against diversified demand.

TT Overview and Recent Performance

Trane Technologies is a global climate innovator serving commercial and residential HVAC, building controls, and transport refrigeration markets. Recent market activity has been defined by exceptional demand. Enterprise bookings have accelerated sharply, rising by double digits and reaching record levels, with a particular surge in Americas Commercial HVAC led by applied equipment used in data centers and other high-tech projects. The company exited recent quarters with a record backlog measured in the tens of billions of dollars, providing substantial revenue visibility. Organic revenue growth has been strong, though like Ingersoll Rand, the company has experienced some margin pressure as inflation and reinvestment costs outpace pricing. Trane has reinforced its position in modular cooling through acquisitions and continues to expand its services business, which now accounts for roughly one-third of revenue. This momentum has supported a premium valuation but also concentrated investor attention on execution and backlog conversion.

Trending AI Robots

For traders seeking a systematic edge, Tickeron maintains a dedicated Trending AI Robots page that curates the platform's most relevant automated strategies for current conditions. Tickeron offers hundreds of AI trading bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers, but only a select subset earns a place in this curated section. These bots vary widely in trading style, strategy, timeframe, performance history, and the sets of tickers they trade, ranging from short-term momentum systems to longer-horizon swing strategies. Because each bot is designed with different objectives and risk parameters, the trending selection helps users identify the strategies best aligned with prevailing market conditions. Investors interested in applying algorithmic analysis to names like IR and TT can explore the Trending AI Robots section to review current performance and statistics.

Head-to-Head Comparison

Several structural contrasts define this pairing. Ingersoll Rand offers broad industrial diversification, with exposure spanning compressors, power tools, and life-sciences equipment, which can smooth cyclical swings but also dilutes concentration in any single high-growth theme. Trane Technologies, by contrast, is more concentrated in climate solutions and is a more direct beneficiary of the data-center and electrification buildout, giving it a stronger current demand catalyst. Growth profiles differ accordingly: Trane has posted dramatic double-digit booking growth and a rapidly expanding backlog, while Ingersoll Rand's organic growth has been more moderate. Valuation also diverges, with Trane trading at a higher earnings multiple that reflects its momentum and quality premium, whereas Ingersoll Rand's multiple is more modest against its diversified earnings base. Risk factors differ as well: Ingersoll Rand faces China pricing pressure and integration risk from acquisitions, while Trane contends with commodity costs, competition in HVAC, and a weaker transport segment. In terms of market sentiment, Trane's order momentum and raised guidance have generated more consistent optimism, while Ingersoll Rand's margin story has produced a more measured reaction.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable trend consistency, relative momentum, and catalyst strength, Tickeron's AI would likely favor Trane Technologies in the current environment. Trane's record bookings, expanding backlog, and direct exposure to structurally growing data-center cooling demand present a clearer and more durable growth signal than Ingersoll Rand's more diversified but slower-accelerating order profile. That said, the analysis is probabilistic rather than definitive: Trane's premium valuation and margin pressures introduce execution risk, while Ingersoll Rand's recurring aftermarket base and diversified portfolio offer stability that could appeal if industrial demand broadens. The AI's preference would hinge on momentum and catalyst quality, which currently tilt toward Trane, while acknowledging that valuation and diversification remain meaningful counterweights.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
IR vs. TT commentary
Oct 09, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IR is a StrongBuy and TT is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IR vs TT: Fundamental Ratings
IR
TT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3134
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
65
Fair valued
78
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6210
SMR RATING
1..100
7328
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5446
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9135
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IR's Valuation (65) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as TT (78) in the null industry. This means that IR’s stock grew similarly to TT’s over the last 12 months.

TT's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IR (62) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means that TT’s stock grew somewhat faster than IR’s over the last 12 months.

TT's SMR Rating (28) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IR (73) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means that TT’s stock grew somewhat faster than IR’s over the last 12 months.

TT's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as IR (54) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means that TT’s stock grew similarly to IR’s over the last 12 months.

TT's P/E Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IR (91) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means that TT’s stock grew somewhat faster than IR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IRTT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 09, 2026
Stock price -- (IR: $78.00 vs. TT: $469.94)
Brand notoriety: IR: Notable vs. TT: Not notable
IR represents the Industrial Machinery, while TT is part of the Building Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IR: 94% vs. TT: 102%
Market capitalization -- IR: $29.64B vs. TT: $99.46B
IR [@Industrial Machinery] is valued at $29.64B. TT’s [@Building Products] market capitalization is $99.46B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Industrial Machinery] industry ranges from $3.71K to $252.96B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Building Products] industry ranges from $1.88K to $99.46B. The average market capitalization across the [@Industrial Machinery] industry is $15.66B. The average market capitalization across the [@Building Products] industry is $10.05B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while TT’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • IR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, TT is a better buy in the long-term than IR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TT’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TT’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TT is a better buy in the short-term than IR.

Price Growth

IR (@Industrial Machinery) experienced а +3.65% price change this week, while TT (@Building Products) price change was +2.40% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was -3.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.25%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Building Products industry was +0.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.94%.

Reported Earning Dates

IR is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.

TT is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Industrial Machinery (-3.30% weekly)

The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.

@Building Products (+0.27% weekly)

The industry manufactures products used in the construction of residential and commercial buildings. The process involves using materials and other products, and processing them to create finished items such as doors, windows, light fittings, floor coverings, climate control products and other building components and home improvement products. Masco Corporation, Allegion PLC and Lennox International Inc. are major manufacturers of such products.

View a ticker or compare two or three
IR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WMG28.910.75
+2.66%
Warner Music Group Corp
PAL3.510.09
+2.63%
Proficient Auto Logistics Inc
CARG29.240.47
+1.63%
CarGurus
KRNY9.200.09
+0.99%
Kearny Financial Corp
TRIB6.06-0.69
-10.22%
Trinity Biotech PLC

TT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TT has been closely correlated with IR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TT jumps, then IR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TT
1D Price
Change %
TT100%
+0.57%
IR - TT
77%
Closely correlated
+0.98%
JCI - TT
74%
Closely correlated
-1.24%
CARR - TT
66%
Closely correlated
+1.51%
LII - TT
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.87%
SPXC - TT
58%
Loosely correlated
-1.20%
More