Advertisement
IR vs TT
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Ingersoll Rand (IR) vs. Trane Technologies (TT) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- TT has significantly outperformed IR year-to-date with gains around 23% compared to IR's approximately 4%, driven by stronger commercial HVAC demand.
- Both companies reported solid Q1 2026 earnings beats, but TT raised full-year guidance amid a record $10.7 billion backlog, while IR maintained outlook post-acquisition.
- TT's larger market cap of over $105 billion dwarfs IR's $30 billion, reflecting greater scale in climate and building solutions.
- Recent momentum favors TT due to data center cooling tailwinds, while IR benefits from industrial technologies and M&A (mergers and acquisitions).
- Analyst targets suggest upside for both, with TT at ~$518 average and IR at ~$95, indicating relative value in current market positioning.
- Tickeron's AI tools highlight industrials sector strength, where both compete, with bots achieving up to 70%+ annualized returns in similar tickers.
Introduction
This stock comparison examines IR (Ingersoll Rand) and TT (Trane Technologies), two leaders in the industrials sector focused on mission-critical equipment for compression, HVAC, and fluid management. Both have shown resilience in recent market activity amid economic uncertainty, with strong Q1 earnings and sector tailwinds from infrastructure and energy efficiency demands. Traders seeking momentum plays may favor recent relative performance, while long-term investors could weigh scale, backlogs, and growth catalysts. This analysis aids in understanding their relative performance, business models, and positioning for ongoing volatility.
IR Overview and Recent Performance
Ingersoll Rand (IR) is a global provider of mission-critical air, fluid, energy, and medical technologies, operating in industrial technologies and precision science segments. Its portfolio includes compressors, blowers, vacuum pumps, and fluid management tools serving industrial, medical, and energy markets.
In recent weeks, IR shares have traded around $76, down from 52-week highs near $101 but above lows of $72, reflecting YTD gains of about 4% amid broader sector rotation. Q1 2026 results beat estimates with revenue up 8% to $1.85 billion and adjusted EPS of $0.77 versus $0.74 expected, supported by orders growth and a robust backlog. Sentiment has been bolstered by the acquisition of Fox s.r.l. to enhance metering and dosing capabilities, alongside maintained full-year guidance for 2.5-4.5% revenue growth. However, geopolitical headwinds and high P/E ratio near 51 have tempered gains, with analysts' average target at $95 signaling potential upside.
TT Overview and Recent Performance
Trane Technologies (TT) designs, manufactures, and services HVAC, transport refrigeration, and climate solutions under brands like Trane and Thermo King, targeting commercial buildings, residential, and transportation sectors across Americas, EMEA, and Asia Pacific.
Recent market activity has seen TT shares around $477, within a 52-week range of $348-$503, delivering strong YTD performance of roughly 23%. Q1 2026 earnings exceeded forecasts with revenue up 6% to $4.97 billion and adjusted continuing EPS of $2.63 beating $2.53 estimates, fueled by 24% organic bookings growth—led by 40% in Americas commercial HVAC—and a record $10.7 billion backlog. The company raised full-year revenue and EPS guidance to a midpoint of $14.85, driven by data center cooling demand and energy efficiency trends. Trading at a P/E of about 37 with an average analyst target of $518, positive sentiment reflects durable catalysts despite market volatility.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates the top-performing AI trading bots from its library of 351 total bots that trade thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. Only the most suitable for current market conditions—such as volatility in growth sectors like semiconductors, industrials, and leveraged ETFs—earn a spot among the 25 featured trending robots. These bots showcase impressive stats, including annualized returns up to +169%, win rates from 51% to 88%, and profit factors ranging 1.5 to 11.7. For instance, an industrials bot on tickers like ETN and HUBB delivered +70% annualized returns on a 60-minute timeframe, while semiconductor strategies hit +95% with 63% win rates. With diverse styles like trend-following, multi-agent long/short, and TP/SL (take-profit/stop-loss) corridors on timeframes from 5 to 60 minutes, they enable copy trading via signals, virtual portfolios, or brokerage integration. Explore these high-conviction bots tailored to today's opportunities at Trending AI Robots.
Head-to-Head Comparison
IR and TT operate in overlapping industrials spaces but diverge in focus: IR emphasizes diversified compression and fluid technologies for broad industrial applications, while TT specializes in HVAC and refrigeration tied to building efficiency and transport. Growth drivers contrast with TT's exposure to data centers and commercial backlogs versus IR's reliance on M&A and organic orders.
Recent momentum heavily favors TT, with 23% YTD gains outpacing IR's 4%, reflecting superior bookings and guidance raises amid HVAC demand. Risk factors include IR's higher beta (1.25) and P/E (51), suggesting greater volatility and valuation stretch, compared to TT's scale (market cap $105B vs. $30B) and lower P/E (37). Sector exposure highlights TT's climate innovation edge in energy transition plays, while IR offers stability in precision tools. Market sentiment leans toward TT's catalysts like record backlogs, though IR's acquisitions provide trade-offs in diversification.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI currently favors TT over IR, based on consistent trend strength, superior YTD relative performance, and catalysts like the record backlog and raised guidance signaling sustained momentum in high-demand HVAC. TT's larger scale and lower valuation multiples enhance stability, while IR trails in growth positioning despite earnings beats. Probabilistic factors point to nearer-term outperformance for TT, though IR merits attention for industrial recovery.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IR is a Hold and TT is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
IR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTT’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- IR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- TT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
IR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TT’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- IR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- TT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
IR (@Industrial Machinery) experienced а -7.10% price change this week, while TT (@Building Products) price change was +0.09% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was -1.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.53%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Building Products industry was -1.29%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +13.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.65%.
Reported Earning Dates
IR is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
TT is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Industrial Machinery (-1.68% weekly)The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.
@Building Products (-1.29% weekly)The industry manufactures products used in the construction of residential and commercial buildings. The process involves using materials and other products, and processing them to create finished items such as doors, windows, light fittings, floor coverings, climate control products and other building components and home improvement products. Masco Corporation, Allegion PLC and Lennox International Inc. are major manufacturers of such products.
| IR | TT | IR / TT | |
| Capitalization | 27.5B | 103B | 27% |
| EBITDA | 1.69B | 4.26B | 40% |
| Gain YTD | -11.152 | 20.176 | -55% |
| P/E Ratio | 47.53 | 35.65 | 133% |
| Revenue | 7.78B | 21.6B | 36% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 1.07B | - |
| Total Debt | 4.84B | 4.62B | 105% |
IR | TT | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 63 | 81 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 80 Overvalued | 82 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 68 | 11 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 83 | 26 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 64 | 43 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 33 | 44 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
IR's Valuation (80) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as TT (82) in the null industry. This means that IR’s stock grew similarly to TT’s over the last 12 months.
TT's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IR (68) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means that TT’s stock grew somewhat faster than IR’s over the last 12 months.
TT's SMR Rating (26) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IR (83) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means that TT’s stock grew somewhat faster than IR’s over the last 12 months.
TT's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as IR (64) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means that TT’s stock grew similarly to IR’s over the last 12 months.
IR's P/E Growth Rating (33) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as TT (44) in the null industry. This means that IR’s stock grew similarly to TT’s over the last 12 months.
| IR | TT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 49% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 65% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 62% | 3 days ago 57% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 64% | 3 days ago 62% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 59% | 3 days ago 67% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 62% | 3 days ago 67% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 65% | 4 days ago 67% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 57% | 10 days ago 56% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 66% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| IBDR | 24.22 | 0.01 | +0.04% |
| iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Corp ETF | |||
| BUCK | 23.49 | -0.10 | -0.42% |
| Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF | |||
| IBAT | 43.95 | -1.38 | -3.04% |
| iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF | |||
| BOEG | 14.38 | -1.20 | -7.68% |
| Leverage Shares 2X Long BA Daily ETF | |||
| IREX | 36.13 | -8.10 | -18.31% |
| Tradr 2X Long IREN Daily ETF | |||
IR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IR has been closely correlated with JCI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IR jumps, then JCI could also see price increases.
TT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TT has been closely correlated with IR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TT jumps, then IR could also see price increases.