ISRLU
Price
$11.50
Change
+$0.02 (+0.17%)
Updated
Mar 26 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
UMAC
Price
$5.31
Change
-$0.57 (-9.69%)
Updated
Apr 4 closing price
Capitalization
15.89M
38 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

ISRLU vs UMAC

Header iconISRLU vs UMAC Comparison
Open Charts ISRLU vs UMACBanner chart's image
Israel Acquisitions
Price$11.50
Change+$0.02 (+0.17%)
Volume$654
CapitalizationN/A
Unusual Machines
Price$5.31
Change-$0.57 (-9.69%)
Volume$701.53K
Capitalization15.89M
ISRLU vs UMAC Comparison Chart
Loading...
UMAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ISRLU vs. UMAC commentary
Apr 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ISRLU is a StrongBuy and UMAC is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 07, 2025
Stock price -- (ISRLU: $11.50 vs. UMAC: $5.31)
Brand notoriety: ISRLU and UMAC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ISRLU: 76% vs. UMAC: 66%
Market capitalization -- ISRLU: $0 vs. UMAC: $15.89M
ISRLU [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $0. UMAC’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $15.89M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $3.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ISRLU’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileUMAC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ISRLU’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • UMAC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ISRLU is a better buy in the long-term than UMAC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

UMAC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • UMAC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

ISRLU (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while UMAC (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was -20.51% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -1.29%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.86%.

Reported Earning Dates

ISRLU is expected to report earnings on Apr 17, 2023.

UMAC is expected to report earnings on May 14, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (-1.29% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ISRLU YTD gains are higher at: 1.680 vs. UMAC (-68.430). ISRLU has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.05M vs. UMAC (-1.79M). UMAC has more cash in the bank: 895K vs. ISRLU (672K). ISRLU (0) and UMAC (0) have equivalent revenues.
ISRLUUMACISRLU / UMAC
CapitalizationN/A15.9M-
EBITDA-1.05M-1.79M58%
Gain YTD1.680-68.430-2%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash672K895K75%
Total Debt157KN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
UMAC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
UMAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CVMCX15.71-0.83
-5.02%
Calvert Emerging Markets Equity C
TVIFX66.92-3.66
-5.19%
Thornburg Small/Mid Cap Core I
GCHDX10.59-0.58
-5.19%
Gotham Hedged Core Institutional
SMVLX67.69-3.86
-5.39%
Smead Value Investor
NOIGX9.86-0.63
-6.01%
Northern International Equity

ISRLU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ISRLU and BRAC have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ISRLU and BRAC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ISRLU
1D Price
Change %
ISRLU100%
N/A
BRAC - ISRLU
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UMAC - ISRLU
22%
Poorly correlated
-9.69%
SPKLU - ISRLU
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RENEU - ISRLU
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
YOTA - ISRLU
14%
Poorly correlated
-0.17%
More

UMAC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that UMAC and FRHC have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that UMAC and FRHC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UMAC
1D Price
Change %
UMAC100%
-9.69%
FRHC - UMAC
25%
Poorly correlated
-7.30%
SPKLU - UMAC
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ISRLU - UMAC
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NETD - UMAC
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AITR - UMAC
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.05%
More