ISVLF
Price
$0.17
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 3 closing price
Capitalization
40.04M
MAG
Price
$19.94
Change
+$0.18 (+0.91%)
Updated
Jun 3 closing price
Capitalization
1.12B
68 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ISVLF vs MAG

Header iconISVLF vs MAG Comparison
Open Charts ISVLF vs MAGBanner chart's image
IMPACT Silver
Price$0.17
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$440.19K
Capitalization40.04M
MAG Silver
Price$19.94
Change+$0.18 (+0.91%)
Volume$1.54M
Capitalization1.12B
ISVLF vs MAG Comparison Chart
Loading...
ISVLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MAG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ISVLF vs. MAG commentary
Jun 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ISVLF is a Buy and MAG is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 04, 2025
Stock price -- (ISVLF: $0.17 vs. MAG: $19.94)
Brand notoriety: ISVLF and MAG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ISVLF: 197% vs. MAG: 95%
Market capitalization -- ISVLF: $40.04M vs. MAG: $1.12B
ISVLF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $40.04M. MAG’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $1.12B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ISVLF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMAG’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ISVLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MAG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MAG is a better buy in the long-term than ISVLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ISVLF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MAG’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ISVLF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MAG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both ISVLF and MAG are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

ISVLF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +32.35% price change this week, while MAG (@Precious Metals) price change was +6.92% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +4.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was +40.35%.

Reported Earning Dates

ISVLF is expected to report earnings on May 05, 2025.

MAG is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+4.42% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MAG($1.12B) has a higher market cap than ISVLF($40M). ISVLF has higher P/E ratio than MAG: ISVLF (59.17) vs MAG (22.98). MAG YTD gains are higher at: 50.048 vs. ISVLF (24.676). ISVLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.38M vs. MAG (-13.89M). MAG has more cash in the bank: 68.7M vs. ISVLF (14.4M). ISVLF has less debt than MAG: ISVLF (125K) vs MAG (154K). ISVLF has higher revenues than MAG: ISVLF (16.8M) vs MAG (0).
ISVLFMAGISVLF / MAG
Capitalization40M1.12B4%
EBITDA-1.38M-13.89M10%
Gain YTD24.67650.04849%
P/E Ratio59.1722.98258%
Revenue16.8M0-
Total Cash14.4M68.7M21%
Total Debt125K154K81%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ISVLF vs MAG: Fundamental Ratings
ISVLF
MAG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1430
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
82
Overvalued
75
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10057
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4738
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MAG's Valuation (75) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as ISVLF (82) in the null industry. This means that MAG’s stock grew similarly to ISVLF’s over the last 12 months.

MAG's Profit vs Risk Rating (57) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ISVLF (100) in the null industry. This means that MAG’s stock grew somewhat faster than ISVLF’s over the last 12 months.

MAG's SMR Rating (100) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as ISVLF (100) in the null industry. This means that MAG’s stock grew similarly to ISVLF’s over the last 12 months.

MAG's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as ISVLF (47) in the null industry. This means that MAG’s stock grew similarly to ISVLF’s over the last 12 months.

MAG's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as ISVLF (100) in the null industry. This means that MAG’s stock grew similarly to ISVLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ISVLFMAG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
88%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ISVLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MAG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AEHR10.240.58
+6.00%
Aehr Test Systems
OMCC5.370.27
+5.36%
Old Market Capital Corporation
BCC87.602.48
+2.91%
Boise Cascade Company
PH664.714.41
+0.67%
Parker-Hannifin Corp
TASK16.72-0.05
-0.30%
TaskUs

ISVLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ISVLF has been loosely correlated with MAG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ISVLF jumps, then MAG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ISVLF
1D Price
Change %
ISVLF100%
+3.77%
MAG - ISVLF
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.91%
PAAS - ISVLF
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.38%
AG - ISVLF
58%
Loosely correlated
+2.47%
FSM - ISVLF
57%
Loosely correlated
+1.83%
HL - ISVLF
55%
Loosely correlated
+2.49%
More