ISVLF
Price
$0.13
Change
+$0.01 (+8.33%)
Updated
Apr 9 closing price
Capitalization
40.04M
ORZCF
Price
$0.68
Change
+$0.09 (+15.25%)
Updated
Apr 10 closing price
Capitalization
323.07M
27 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

ISVLF vs ORZCF

Header iconISVLF vs ORZCF Comparison
Open Charts ISVLF vs ORZCFBanner chart's image
IMPACT Silver
Price$0.13
Change+$0.01 (+8.33%)
Volume$360.31K
Capitalization40.04M
Orezone Gold
Price$0.68
Change+$0.09 (+15.25%)
Volume$95.41K
Capitalization323.07M
ISVLF vs ORZCF Comparison Chart
Loading...
ISVLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ISVLF vs. ORZCF commentary
Apr 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ISVLF is a Hold and ORZCF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 11, 2025
Stock price -- (ISVLF: $0.13 vs. ORZCF: $0.68)
Brand notoriety: ISVLF and ORZCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ISVLF: 69% vs. ORZCF: 123%
Market capitalization -- ISVLF: $40.04M vs. ORZCF: $323.07M
ISVLF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $40.04M. ORZCF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $323.07M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.12B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ISVLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileORZCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ISVLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • ORZCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ORZCF is a better buy in the long-term than ISVLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ISVLF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • ISVLF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

ISVLF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +2.76% price change this week, while ORZCF (@Precious Metals) price change was +9.32% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -0.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.78%.

Reported Earning Dates

ORZCF is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-0.81% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ORZCF($323M) has a higher market cap than ISVLF($40M). ISVLF has higher P/E ratio than ORZCF: ISVLF (59.17) vs ORZCF (9.67). ORZCF YTD gains are higher at: 54.329 vs. ISVLF (-6.115). ORZCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 51.9M vs. ISVLF (-1.38M). ORZCF has more cash in the bank: 45.2M vs. ISVLF (14.4M). ISVLF has less debt than ORZCF: ISVLF (125K) vs ORZCF (115M). ORZCF has higher revenues than ISVLF: ORZCF (125M) vs ISVLF (16.8M).
ISVLFORZCFISVLF / ORZCF
Capitalization40M323M12%
EBITDA-1.38M51.9M-3%
Gain YTD-6.11554.329-11%
P/E Ratio59.179.67612%
Revenue16.8M125M13%
Total Cash14.4M45.2M32%
Total Debt125K115M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ISVLF vs ORZCF: Fundamental Ratings
ISVLF
ORZCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7657
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
81
Overvalued
49
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10063
SMR RATING
1..100
9253
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8356
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1459
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ORZCF's Valuation (49) in the null industry is in the same range as ISVLF (81). This means that ORZCF’s stock grew similarly to ISVLF’s over the last 12 months.

ORZCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (63) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ISVLF (100). This means that ORZCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ISVLF’s over the last 12 months.

ORZCF's SMR Rating (53) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ISVLF (92). This means that ORZCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ISVLF’s over the last 12 months.

ORZCF's Price Growth Rating (56) in the null industry is in the same range as ISVLF (83). This means that ORZCF’s stock grew similarly to ISVLF’s over the last 12 months.

ISVLF's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ORZCF (59). This means that ISVLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ORZCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ISVLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
ISVLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SONY22.92-0.05
-0.22%
Sony Group Corporation
NEXN8.52-0.04
-0.47%
Nexxen International Ltd
HWKN110.46-1.87
-1.66%
Hawkins
BEP21.37-0.42
-1.93%
Brookfield Renewable Partners LP
ASPS0.79-0.06
-7.46%
Altisource Portfolio Solutions SA

ISVLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ISVLF has been loosely correlated with MAG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ISVLF jumps, then MAG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ISVLF
1D Price
Change %
ISVLF100%
+7.14%
MAG - ISVLF
61%
Loosely correlated
+10.91%
PAAS - ISVLF
60%
Loosely correlated
+12.38%
AG - ISVLF
58%
Loosely correlated
+13.17%
FSM - ISVLF
57%
Loosely correlated
+10.79%
HL - ISVLF
55%
Loosely correlated
+12.10%
More

ORZCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ORZCF has been loosely correlated with AEM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ORZCF jumps, then AEM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ORZCF
1D Price
Change %
ORZCF100%
+16.08%
AEM - ORZCF
42%
Loosely correlated
+5.43%
NFGC - ORZCF
41%
Loosely correlated
+4.59%
GOLD - ORZCF
41%
Loosely correlated
+2.34%
ISVLF - ORZCF
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.78%
ARMN - ORZCF
40%
Loosely correlated
+5.33%
More