Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ITBFX vs PDBAX
ITBFX vs PDBAX Comparison
Open Charts ITBFX vs PDBAX
Hartford Total Return Bond F
Price$8.90
Change-$0.02 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.35B
PGIM Total Return Bond A
Price$11.93
Change-$0.02 (-0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets48.85B
ITBFX vs PDBAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ITBFX vs. PDBAX commentary
Jun 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ITBFX is a Hold and PDBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PDBAX has more cash in the bank: 48.8B vs. ITBFX (4.35B). ITBFX (4.55) and PDBAX (4.42) have matching dividends . ITBFX was incepted earlier than PDBAX: ITBFX (8 years) vs PDBAX (30 years). PDBAX (0.77) is less costly to investors than ITBFX (0.32). PDBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 113.00 vs. ITBFX (47.00). PDBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than ITBFX: PDBAX (1000) vs ITBFX (1000000). PDBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.75 vs. ITBFX (4.26). PDBAX return over 5 years is better than : -1.64 vs. ITBFX (-2.37).
| ITBFX | PDBAX | ITBFX / PDBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.32 | 0.76 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.32 | 0.77 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.415 | 2.597 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | 3% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.35B | 48.8B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.55 | 4.42 | 103% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.26 | 4.75 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.38 | 7.04 | 119% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.37 | -1.64 | 145% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 16.97 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers