Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ITBFX vs PDBZX
ITBFX vs PDBZX Comparison
Open Charts ITBFX vs PDBZX
Hartford Total Return Bond F
Price$8.90
Change-$0.02 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.35B
PGIM Total Return Bond Z
Price$11.88
Change-$0.03 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets48.85B
ITBFX vs PDBZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ITBFX vs. PDBZX commentary
Jun 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ITBFX is a Hold and PDBZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PDBZX has more cash in the bank: 48.8B vs. ITBFX (4.35B). PDBZX (4.69) and ITBFX (4.55) have matching dividends . ITBFX was incepted earlier than PDBZX: ITBFX (8 years) vs PDBZX (29 years). PDBZX (0.50) is less costly to investors than ITBFX (0.32). PDBZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 113.00 vs. ITBFX (47.00). PDBZX has a lower initial minimum investment than ITBFX: PDBZX (0) vs ITBFX (1000000). PDBZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.03 vs. ITBFX (4.26). PDBZX return over 5 years is better than : -0.30 vs. ITBFX (-2.37).
| ITBFX | PDBZX | ITBFX / PDBZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.32 | 0.49 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.32 | 0.50 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.415 | 2.713 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.35B | 48.8B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.55 | 4.69 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.26 | 5.03 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.38 | 7.97 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.37 | -0.30 | 799% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 20.16 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement