Growth investors frequently face a common question: should they own a broad large- and mid-cap growth fund, or a more concentrated pure large-cap growth vehicle? The iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG) and the Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) sit at the center of that decision. Both are among the most cost-efficient ways to gain exposure to U.S. growth equities, and both lean heavily on mega-cap technology leaders. This comparison examines their market positioning, recent momentum, sector concentration, and risk profiles to help traders and investors understand how these two widely held funds stack up in the current market environment.
The iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG) seeks to track the S&P 900 Growth Index, a benchmark of U.S. large- and mid-cap companies screened for above-average earnings and revenue growth. The fund holds roughly 400 securities, with information technology representing about 52% of assets, followed by communication services and financials. Its largest positions include NVIDIA, Microsoft, Apple, Alphabet, and Broadcom.
In recent weeks, IUSG has traded within a relatively stable range near its upper bounds, with a modest gain over the trailing year and a 52-week range spanning roughly $148 to $200. The fund's three-year beta of about 1.17 to 1.20 indicates it moves somewhat more than the broader market. Technical readings have been mixed, with its Relative Strength Index (RSI), a momentum gauge, hovering near neutral territory in recent sessions. Sentiment has been shaped primarily by the performance of its mega-cap technology and semiconductor holdings, which remain sensitive to shifts in interest-rate expectations and artificial-intelligence capital spending.
The Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index, which selects growth companies from the 750 largest U.S. stocks by market capitalization. The fund is more concentrated than IUSG, holding roughly 190 securities, with technology also near 52% to 54% of assets and communication services as the second-largest sector. NVIDIA, Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, and Alphabet lead its top holdings.
In recent market activity, SCHG has traded close to its 52-week highs, reflecting firm momentum in large-cap growth names. The fund's larger average daily trading volume and substantial assets under management (AUM) of roughly $63 billion to $67 billion make it one of the most liquid growth ETFs available. Technical indicators have been comparatively constructive, with momentum measures registering above neutral. As with IUSG, performance has been driven by a handful of mega-cap technology and semiconductor companies, alongside notable healthcare contributors such as Eli Lilly.
Tickeron maintains a marketplace of hundreds of AI Trading Bots that monitor thousands of different tickers across stocks, ETFs, forex, and cryptocurrency. Because market conditions change, not every strategy is well suited to the current environment. The Trending AI Robots page curates a focused selection of the most relevant bots for present conditions. These bots vary widely in trading style, timeframe, strategy, performance history, and the sets of tickers they trade, with configurations ranging from multi-ticker swing systems to concentrated intraday strategies. Reported metrics can include annualized returns, win rates, profit factors, and Sharpe ratios, though individual results differ significantly by robot. Traders seeking a systematic approach can review this curated selection to find strategies aligned with their objectives and risk tolerance.
Although IUSG and SCHG occupy the same large-cap growth category and share near-identical expense ratios of 0.04%, their construction differs meaningfully. IUSG draws from a broader universe that includes mid-cap growth stocks, giving it a slightly wider net and somewhat lower top-heavy concentration. SCHG, by contrast, is a purer large-cap play with fewer holdings and a greater share of assets in its top ten names.
Sector exposure is broadly similar, with technology and communication services dominating both portfolios, so relative performance often hinges on the same mega-cap drivers. However, SCHG's concentration can amplify both gains and drawdowns, while IUSG's additional holdings offer marginally more diversification. On risk, both funds carry betas above 1.1, meaning they tend to amplify broader market moves. Liquidity favors SCHG, which trades far more shares daily than IUSG. From a momentum standpoint, SCHG has recently shown stronger relative strength and has been trading nearer its highs, while IUSG has displayed more neutral technical readings.
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, momentum, liquidity, and relative positioning, Tickeron's AI would currently lean toward SCHG. The fund's stronger recent relative strength, its proximity to 52-week highs, and its deeper trading liquidity give it a modest near-term edge over IUSG. That said, the two funds share substantial overlap in their largest holdings, and the distinction in their performance is likely to remain narrow. Investors prioritizing broader diversification and mid-cap exposure may still find IUSG's structure preferable, but on current trend and momentum signals, SCHG holds a slight advantage.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
The RSI Indicator for IUSG moved out of oversold territory on October 26, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is shifting from a downward trend to an upward trend. Traders may want to buy the stock or call options. The A.I.dvisor looked at 24 similar instances when the indicator left oversold territory. In 22 of the 24 cases the stock moved higher. This puts the odds of a move higher at 90%.
The Stochastic Oscillator suggests the stock price trend may be in a reversal from a downward trend to an upward trend. 41 of 47 cases where IUSG's Stochastic Oscillator exited the oversold zone resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 87%.
Following a +1.55% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where IUSG advanced for three days, in 309 of 365 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 85%.
IUSG may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 344 of 386 cases where IUSG Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 89%.
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 14, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on IUSG as a result. In 62 of 79 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 78%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for IUSG turned negative on October 14, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 49 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 41 of the 49 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 84%.
IUSG moved below its 50-day moving average on October 16, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
The 10-day moving average for IUSG crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on October 23, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 11 of 14 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 79%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where IUSG declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 77%.
SCHG may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options. In 38 of 40 cases where SCHG's price broke its lower Bollinger Band, its price rose further in the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.
The Stochastic Oscillator suggests the stock price trend may be in a reversal from a downward trend to an upward trend. 46 of 52 cases where SCHG's Stochastic Oscillator exited the oversold zone resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 88%.
Following a +1.48% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where SCHG advanced for three days, in 312 of 369 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 85%.
The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 346 of 383 cases where SCHG Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 90%.
The 10-day RSI Indicator for SCHG moved out of overbought territory on October 08, 2026. This could be a bearish sign for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 52 similar instances where the indicator moved out of overbought territory. In 46 of the 52 cases, the stock moved lower in the following days. This puts the odds of a move lower at 88%.
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 14, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on SCHG as a result. In 60 of 78 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 77%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for SCHG turned negative on October 14, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 48 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 41 of the 48 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 85%.
SCHG moved below its 50-day moving average on October 22, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
The 10-day moving average for SCHG crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on October 26, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 8 of 14 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 57%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where SCHG declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 79%.
| IUSG | SCHG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 88% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 85% | 6 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 4 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 90% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IUSG has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IUSG jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IUSG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IUSG | 100% | -2.63% | ||
| LRCX - IUSG | 76% Closely correlated | -6.01% | ||
| NVDA - IUSG | 75% Closely correlated | -4.22% | ||
| AMAT - IUSG | 74% Closely correlated | -7.49% | ||
| QCOM - IUSG | 68% Closely correlated | -11.12% | ||
| ENTG - IUSG | 65% Loosely correlated | -3.51% | ||
More | ||||
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| NDIA | 26.60 | 0.18 | +0.69% |
| Global X India Active ETF (NDIA) | |||
| EIPX | 34.28 | 0.12 | +0.35% |
| FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF (EIPX) | |||
| IVSI | 28.99 | N/A | N/A |
| Applied Finance IVS International Large ETF | |||
| DDFO | 22.95 | -0.17 | -0.74% |
| Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - October (DDFO) | |||
| ESGE | 49.44 | -1.42 | -2.79% |
| iShares ESG Aware MSCI EM ETF (ESGE) | |||