Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IVW vs PLDR
IVW vs PLDR Comparison
Open Charts IVW vs PLDR
iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF
Price$105.69
Change+$1.26 (+1.21%)
Volume$428
Net Assets57.42B
Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF
Price$32.82
Change+$0.28 (+0.86%)
Volume$404
Net Assets698.58M
IVW vs PLDR Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IVW vs. PLDR commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IVW is a Buy and PLDR is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IVW has more net assets: 57.4B vs. PLDR (699M). IVW has a higher annual dividend yield than PLDR: IVW (2.973) vs PLDR (-2.397). IVW was incepted earlier than PLDR: IVW (25 years) vs PLDR (4 years). IVW (0.18) has a lower expense ratio than PLDR (0.60). PLDR (32.00) and IVW (31.00) have matching turnover.
| IVW | PLDR | IVW / PLDR | |
| Gain YTD | 2.973 | -2.397 | -124% |
| Net Assets | 57.4B | 699M | 8,212% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.18 | 0.60 | 30% |
| Turnover | 31.00 | 32.00 | 97% |
| Yield | 0.44 | 0.40 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IVW | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
IVW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IVW has been closely correlated with META. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IVW jumps, then META could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IVW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IVW | 100% | -0.83% | ||
| META - IVW | 79% Closely correlated | -0.48% | ||
| LRCX - IVW | 78% Closely correlated | +0.17% | ||
| CDNS - IVW | 78% Closely correlated | +0.64% | ||
| SNPS - IVW | 77% Closely correlated | +1.90% | ||
| MPWR - IVW | 76% Closely correlated | -1.99% | ||
More | ||||
PLDR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PLDR has been loosely correlated with QCOM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PLDR jumps, then QCOM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PLDR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PLDR | 100% | -0.23% | ||
| QCOM - PLDR | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.40% | ||
| TPG - PLDR | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.64% | ||
| ADI - PLDR | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.21% | ||
| CRH - PLDR | 60% Loosely correlated | +2.11% | ||
| STX - PLDR | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.04% | ||
More | ||||