IVW
Price
$134.48
Change
+$2.93 (+2.23%)
Updated
Jun 11, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
71.33B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SPMO
Price
$150.62
Change
+$6.94 (+4.83%)
Updated
Jun 11, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
19.38B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

IVW vs SPMO

Header iconIVW vs SPMO Comparison
Open Charts IVW vs SPMOBanner chart's image
IVW vs SPMO Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF (IVW) vs. Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO)

Key Takeaways

  • IVW tracks the S&P 500 Growth Index, emphasizing companies with strong earnings and revenue growth characteristics, while SPMO follows the S&P 500 Momentum Index, selecting stocks with the strongest recent price performance trends.
  • Both ETFs are passive vehicles offering large-cap U.S. equity exposure but differ in factor tilt: IVW targets growth attributes, whereas SPMO applies a momentum overlay within the same S&P 500 universe.
  • IVW holds approximately 150 securities with an expense ratio of 0.18%, compared to SPMO’s more concentrated 100 holdings and lower expense ratio of 0.13%.
  • Sector allocations in both funds are dominated by Information Technology, though SPMO typically shows greater emphasis on Industrials due to momentum scoring.
  • IVW provides broader diversification across growth-oriented names, while SPMO’s narrower selection and lower cost structure may appeal to investors seeking trend-following efficiency.
  • These ETFs serve investors seeking distinct factor exposures rather than direct competition, allowing complementary use in portfolios targeting growth and momentum dynamics.

Introduction

Investors evaluating large-cap U.S. equity strategies often compare factor-based ETFs to align portfolios with specific market characteristics. The iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF (IVW) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) both draw from the S&P 500 but apply different selection methodologies—one centered on growth fundamentals and the other on price momentum. They do not compete directly but instead offer alternative approaches to capturing performance drivers within the same broad market segment, helping investors fine-tune exposure to prevailing economic and market conditions.

iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF (IVW) Overview

The iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF (IVW) seeks to track the S&P 500 Growth Index, which selects large-cap U.S. stocks exhibiting above-average earnings and revenue growth. The fund is passively managed and typically holds between 140 and 220 securities. Top holdings commonly include major technology and growth companies such as NVIDIA Corp, Microsoft Corp, and Apple Inc. Sector exposure is heavily weighted toward Information Technology (around 51%), followed by Communication Services (approximately 17%) and Consumer Discretionary (about 9%). IVW maintains an expense ratio of 0.18% and rebalances in line with its underlying index methodology, providing transparent, rules-based access to growth-oriented large-cap equities.

Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) Overview

The Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) tracks the S&P 500 Momentum Index, which identifies stocks with the highest momentum scores based on recent price performance. Passively managed, the ETF holds 100 securities. Holdings are concentrated, with top positions frequently featuring names like NVIDIA Corp, Broadcom Inc., and Meta Platforms Inc. Sector breakdown typically features Information Technology near 49%, Industrials around 14%, and Communication Services near 10%. SPMO carries a competitive expense ratio of 0.13% and follows a semi-annual rebalancing schedule aligned with its index, delivering systematic exposure to the momentum factor within large-cap U.S. equities.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Both ETFs operate within the large-cap U.S. equity market, where technology leadership, earnings growth cycles, and momentum persistence influence returns. Macroeconomic factors such as interest rate expectations, corporate earnings trends, and sector rotation between growth and cyclical areas shape the environment. Regulatory developments around technology and artificial intelligence continue to support innovation-driven segments, while broader capital flows into factor strategies reflect investor demand for systematic approaches. Risks include potential reversals in momentum or growth leadership during shifts in economic conditions or valuation adjustments.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, IVW has benefited from sustained strength in growth-oriented technology names, delivering exposure aligned with earnings expansion in high-growth sectors. SPMO has captured periods of strong price trends, often showing distinct behavior during momentum-driven rallies or rotations toward cyclical industrials. Relative positioning highlights IVW’s broader diversification versus SPMO’s concentrated, trend-focused approach. Volatility differences arise from the underlying factors, with momentum strategies potentially exhibiting sharper shifts during trend changes compared to the more stable growth characteristics emphasized by IVW.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener to enhance your research process.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modest preference to the Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) due to its lower expense ratio, concentrated holdings profile, and alignment with momentum trends observed across recent market cycles. The combination of cost efficiency and factor consistency provides a probabilistic edge in environments favoring trend persistence, though both ETFs remain suitable depending on an investor’s specific factor allocation objectives.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
IVW vs. SPMO commentary
Jun 12, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IVW is a Hold and SPMO is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IVW has more net assets: 71.3B vs. SPMO (19.4B). SPMO has a higher annual dividend yield than IVW: SPMO (26.556) vs IVW (9.119). IVW was incepted earlier than SPMO: IVW (26 years) vs SPMO (11 years). SPMO (0.13) has a lower expense ratio than IVW (0.18). SPMO has a higher turnover IVW (31.00) vs IVW (31.00).
IVWSPMOIVW / SPMO
Gain YTD9.11926.55634%
Net Assets71.3B19.4B368%
Total Expense Ratio0.180.13138%
Turnover31.0044.0070%
Yield0.350.6752%
Fund Existence26 years11 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IVWSPMO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IVW
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SPMO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MRAL69.398.56
+14.07%
GraniteShares 2x Long MARA Daily ETF
BITU9.660.49
+5.34%
ProShares Ultra Bitcoin ETF
VIOO131.543.22
+2.51%
Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 ETF
WWJD39.130.93
+2.43%
Inspire International ETF
RSPR37.13-0.13
-0.34%
Invesco S&P 500® Equal Wt Real Estt ETF

IVW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IVW has been closely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IVW jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IVW
1D Price
Change %
IVW100%
+2.24%
NVDA - IVW
76%
Closely correlated
+2.22%
RVTY - IVW
68%
Closely correlated
+0.23%
LRCX - IVW
67%
Closely correlated
+12.65%
AVGO - IVW
66%
Loosely correlated
+3.62%
TER - IVW
63%
Loosely correlated
+9.73%
More

SPMO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SPMO has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SPMO jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SPMO
1D Price
Change %
SPMO100%
+4.80%
LRCX - SPMO
71%
Closely correlated
+12.65%
AVGO - SPMO
67%
Closely correlated
+3.62%
KLAC - SPMO
67%
Closely correlated
+12.92%
ETN - SPMO
65%
Loosely correlated
+4.84%
AMAT - SPMO
64%
Loosely correlated
+11.19%
More