Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IWF vs PLDR
IWF vs PLDR Comparison
Open Charts IWF vs PLDR
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Price$439.86
Change+$2.01 (+0.46%)
Volume$14.93K
Net Assets113.91B
Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF
Price$34.74
Change+$0.16 (+0.46%)
Volume$100
Net Assets736.71M
IWF vs PLDR Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IWF vs. PLDR commentary
Jul 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IWF is a Buy and PLDR is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWF has more net assets: 114B vs. PLDR (737M). IWF has a higher annual dividend yield than PLDR: IWF (9.255) vs PLDR (3.725). IWF was incepted earlier than PLDR: IWF (25 years) vs PLDR (4 years). IWF (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than PLDR (0.60). PLDR has a higher turnover IWF (12.00) vs IWF (12.00).
| IWF | PLDR | IWF / PLDR | |
| Gain YTD | 9.255 | 3.725 | 248% |
| Net Assets | 114B | 737M | 15,468% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.19 | 0.60 | 32% |
| Turnover | 12.00 | 32.00 | 38% |
| Yield | 0.42 | 0.38 | 111% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IWF | PLDR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 64% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 63% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 80% | 10 days ago 71% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
IWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | 100% | +0.29% | ||
| CDNS - IWF | 79% Closely correlated | -0.56% | ||
| SNPS - IWF | 78% Closely correlated | -0.77% | ||
| MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | +0.99% | ||
| AMZN - IWF | 74% Closely correlated | +1.73% | ||
| KLAC - IWF | 73% Closely correlated | +0.79% | ||
More | ||||
PLDR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PLDR has been loosely correlated with TPG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PLDR jumps, then TPG could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PLDR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PLDR | 100% | +0.20% | ||
| TPG - PLDR | 62% Loosely correlated | +2.31% | ||
| QCOM - PLDR | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.65% | ||
| CRH - PLDR | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.35% | ||
| ADI - PLDR | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.75% | ||
| VIK - PLDR | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.89% | ||
More | ||||