Ad is loading...
IWF vs PLDR
IWF vs PLDR Comparison
Open Charts IWF vs PLDR
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Price$343.88
Change-$13.78 (-3.85%)
Volume$16.38K
Net Assets85.2B
Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF
Price$28.52
Change+$1.29 (+4.74%)
Volume$2.2K
Net Assets613.04M
IWF vs PLDR Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IWF vs. PLDR commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IWF is a Hold and PLDR is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWF has more net assets: 85.2B vs. PLDR (613M). IWF has a higher annual dividend yield than PLDR: IWF (-10.841) vs PLDR (-18.314). IWF was incepted earlier than PLDR: IWF (25 years) vs PLDR (4 years). IWF (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than PLDR (0.60). PLDR has a higher turnover IWF (12.00) vs IWF (12.00).
| IWF | PLDR | IWF / PLDR | |
| Gain YTD | -10.841 | -18.314 | 59% |
| Net Assets | 85.2B | 613M | 13,899% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.19 | 0.60 | 32% |
| Turnover | 12.00 | 32.00 | 38% |
| Yield | 0.50 | 0.41 | 120% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IWF | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
IWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | 100% | +11.62% | ||
| CDNS - IWF | 79% Closely correlated | +14.25% | ||
| SNPS - IWF | 78% Closely correlated | +12.35% | ||
| MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | +10.13% | ||
| AMZN - IWF | 74% Closely correlated | +11.98% | ||
| KLAC - IWF | 73% Closely correlated | +17.31% | ||
More | ||||
PLDR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PLDR has been closely correlated with QCOM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PLDR jumps, then QCOM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PLDR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PLDR | 100% | +0.53% | ||
| QCOM - PLDR | 70% Closely correlated | +15.19% | ||
| CRH - PLDR | 66% Loosely correlated | +10.80% | ||
| ADI - PLDR | 66% Loosely correlated | +18.39% | ||
| MRVL - PLDR | 65% Loosely correlated | +21.85% | ||
| STX - PLDR | 65% Loosely correlated | +11.56% | ||
More | ||||