Ad is loading...
IWF vs PTNQ
IWF vs PTNQ Comparison
Open Charts IWF vs PTNQ
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Price$325.67
Change-$20.78 (-6.00%)
Volume$4.86M
Net Assets86.62B
Pacer Trendpilot™ 100 ETF
Price$67.03
Change-$2.26 (-3.26%)
Volume$241.74K
Net Assets1.24B
IWF vs PTNQ Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IWF vs. PTNQ commentary
Apr 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IWF is a Hold and PTNQ is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWF has more net assets: 86.6B vs. PTNQ (1.24B). PTNQ has a higher annual dividend yield than IWF: PTNQ (-9.443) vs IWF (-18.816). IWF was incepted earlier than PTNQ: IWF (25 years) vs PTNQ (10 years). IWF (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than PTNQ (0.65). PTNQ has a higher turnover IWF (12.00) vs IWF (12.00).
| IWF | PTNQ | IWF / PTNQ | |
| Gain YTD | -18.816 | -9.443 | 199% |
| Net Assets | 86.6B | 1.24B | 6,990% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.19 | 0.65 | 29% |
| Turnover | 12.00 | 20.00 | 60% |
| Yield | 0.50 | 2.04 | 24% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 10 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IWF | PTNQ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 61% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 66% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 66% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 70% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 66% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
IWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | 100% | -6.00% | ||
| CDNS - IWF | 79% Closely correlated | -6.44% | ||
| SNPS - IWF | 78% Closely correlated | -7.09% | ||
| MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | -3.56% | ||
| AMZN - IWF | 74% Closely correlated | -4.15% | ||
| KLAC - IWF | 73% Closely correlated | -7.13% | ||
More | ||||
PTNQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PTNQ has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PTNQ jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PTNQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PTNQ | 100% | -3.26% | ||
| CDNS - PTNQ | 78% Closely correlated | -6.44% | ||
| LRCX - PTNQ | 76% Closely correlated | -9.40% | ||
| KLAC - PTNQ | 76% Closely correlated | -7.13% | ||
| SNPS - PTNQ | 76% Closely correlated | -7.09% | ||
| AMAT - PTNQ | 75% Closely correlated | -6.32% | ||
More | ||||