Ad is loading...
IWF vs PTNQ
IWF vs PTNQ Comparison
Open Charts IWF vs PTNQ
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Price$387.87
Change+$5.48 (+1.43%)
Volume$16.69K
Net Assets99.84B
Pacer Trendpilot™ 100 ETF
Price$73.45
Change+$0.57 (+0.78%)
Volume$43.44K
Net Assets1.31B
IWF vs PTNQ Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IWF vs. PTNQ commentary
Mar 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IWF is a Hold and PTNQ is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWF has more net assets: 99.8B vs. PTNQ (1.31B). PTNQ has a higher annual dividend yield than IWF: PTNQ (-0.770) vs IWF (-3.372). IWF was incepted earlier than PTNQ: IWF (25 years) vs PTNQ (10 years). IWF has a higher turnover PTNQ (6.00) vs PTNQ (6.00).
| IWF | PTNQ | IWF / PTNQ | |
| Gain YTD | -3.372 | -0.770 | 438% |
| Net Assets | 99.8B | 1.31B | 7,618% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 14.00 | 6.00 | 233% |
| Yield | 0.58 | 1.40 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 10 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IWF | PTNQ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 70% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 63% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 66% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 64% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 20 days ago 89% | 15 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 70% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
IWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | 100% | +1.48% | ||
| CDNS - IWF | 79% Closely correlated | +1.41% | ||
| SNPS - IWF | 78% Closely correlated | +0.56% | ||
| MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | +3.19% | ||
| AMZN - IWF | 74% Closely correlated | +2.24% | ||
| KLAC - IWF | 73% Closely correlated | +2.40% | ||
More | ||||
PTNQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PTNQ has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PTNQ jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PTNQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PTNQ | 100% | +0.78% | ||
| CDNS - PTNQ | 78% Closely correlated | +1.41% | ||
| LRCX - PTNQ | 76% Closely correlated | +3.73% | ||
| KLAC - PTNQ | 76% Closely correlated | +2.40% | ||
| SNPS - PTNQ | 76% Closely correlated | +0.56% | ||
| AMAT - PTNQ | 75% Closely correlated | +1.60% | ||
More | ||||