IWM | SMIZ | IWM / SMIZ | |
Gain YTD | -4.643 | -1.083 | 429% |
Net Assets | 62.3B | 124M | 50,242% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.19 | 0.55 | 35% |
Turnover | 17.00 | 103.00 | 17% |
Yield | 1.20 | 0.46 | 260% |
Fund Existence | 25 years | 2 years | - |
IWM | SMIZ | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago77% | 2 days ago80% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago84% | 2 days ago90% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago84% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago75% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago84% | 2 days ago70% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago84% | 2 days ago74% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago86% | 14 days ago86% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago86% | 7 days ago67% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago77% | N/A |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago78% | 2 days ago77% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWM has been closely correlated with APG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWM jumps, then APG could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMIZ has been closely correlated with ITT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMIZ jumps, then ITT could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMIZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
SMIZ | 100% | +0.58% | ||
ITT - SMIZ | 88% Closely correlated | +0.56% | ||
JHG - SMIZ | 83% Closely correlated | +0.91% | ||
FLS - SMIZ | 83% Closely correlated | +0.04% | ||
SNV - SMIZ | 82% Closely correlated | +1.08% | ||
KKR - SMIZ | 82% Closely correlated | +1.12% | ||
More |