IWM | XJR | IWM / XJR | |
Gain YTD | -1.430 | -1.609 | 89% |
Net Assets | 70B | 101M | 69,307% |
Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
Turnover | 18.00 | 23.00 | 78% |
Yield | 1.23 | 0.65 | 190% |
Fund Existence | 25 years | 4 years | - |
IWM | XJR | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago90% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago84% | 3 days ago81% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago84% | 3 days ago77% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago76% | 3 days ago76% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago83% | 3 days ago79% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago83% | 3 days ago80% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 19 days ago86% | 19 days ago86% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago84% | 3 days ago83% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago90% | 3 days ago88% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago81% | 3 days ago82% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWM has been closely correlated with APG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWM jumps, then APG could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that XJR and BCC have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that XJR and BCC's prices will move in lockstep.