IWM | XJR | IWM / XJR | |
Gain YTD | -5.414 | -6.460 | 84% |
Net Assets | 61.8B | 96.2M | 64,241% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.19 | 0.12 | 158% |
Turnover | 17.00 | 28.00 | 61% |
Yield | 1.20 | 2.11 | 57% |
Fund Existence | 25 years | 5 years | - |
IWM | XJR | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago83% | 2 days ago81% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago89% | 2 days ago84% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago85% | 2 days ago86% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago89% | 2 days ago81% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago85% | 2 days ago86% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago84% | 2 days ago84% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago86% | 22 days ago86% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 15 days ago86% | 2 days ago84% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago80% | 2 days ago76% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago79% | 2 days ago80% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWM has been closely correlated with APG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWM jumps, then APG could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that XJR and BCC have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that XJR and BCC's prices will move in lockstep.