IWN | SIXS | IWN / SIXS | |
Gain YTD | 12.343 | 9.179 | 134% |
Net Assets | 13.3B | 95.4M | 13,941% |
Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
Turnover | 32.00 | 98.00 | 33% |
Yield | 1.91 | 1.39 | 137% |
Fund Existence | 24 years | 5 years | - |
IWN | SIXS | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago85% | 2 days ago77% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago87% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago86% | 2 days ago81% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago76% | 2 days ago70% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago83% | 2 days ago73% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago85% | 2 days ago81% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 17 days ago86% | 20 days ago82% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago83% | 6 days ago71% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | N/A |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago83% | 2 days ago80% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWN has been closely correlated with SSB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWN jumps, then SSB could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWN | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
IWN | 100% | -1.35% | ||
SSB - IWN | 85% Closely correlated | -1.82% | ||
UFPI - IWN | 80% Closely correlated | -2.09% | ||
TMHC - IWN | 68% Closely correlated | -1.21% | ||
CMC - IWN | 59% Loosely correlated | -3.77% | ||
CIVI - IWN | 56% Loosely correlated | -1.34% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that SIXS and LQDT have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SIXS and LQDT's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SIXS | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
SIXS | 100% | -1.39% | ||
LQDT - SIXS | 17% Poorly correlated | -6.45% | ||
QURE - SIXS | 17% Poorly correlated | -5.40% | ||
HCI - SIXS | 14% Poorly correlated | +0.22% | ||
PBH - SIXS | 11% Poorly correlated | -1.95% | ||
CHCT - SIXS | 10% Poorly correlated | +2.67% | ||
More |