Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IWN vs SLYV
IWN vs SLYV Comparison
Open Charts IWN vs SLYV
iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF
Price$157.44
Change-$2.94 (-1.83%)
Volume$400
Net Assets10.92B
SPDR® S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF
Price$79.13
Change-$1.74 (-2.15%)
Volume$100
Net Assets3.73B
IWN vs SLYV Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IWN vs. SLYV commentary
Aug 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IWN is a Hold and SLYV is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWN has more net assets: 10.9B vs. SLYV (3.73B). IWN has a higher annual dividend yield than SLYV: IWN (-1.543) vs SLYV (-6.365). IWN was incepted earlier than SLYV: IWN (25 years) vs SLYV (25 years). SLYV (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than IWN (0.24). SLYV has a higher turnover IWN (28.00) vs IWN (28.00).
| IWN | SLYV | IWN / SLYV | |
| Gain YTD | -1.543 | -6.365 | 24% |
| Net Assets | 10.9B | 3.73B | 292% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.24 | 0.15 | 160% |
| Turnover | 28.00 | 58.00 | 48% |
| Yield | 1.84 | 2.42 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 25 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IWN | SLYV | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 86% | 10 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
IWN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWN has been closely correlated with SSB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWN jumps, then SSB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWN | 100% | -1.11% | ||
| SSB - IWN | 85% Closely correlated | -1.82% | ||
| UFPI - IWN | 80% Closely correlated | -1.68% | ||
| TMHC - IWN | 68% Closely correlated | -1.07% | ||
| CMC - IWN | 59% Loosely correlated | -0.63% | ||
| CIVI - IWN | 56% Loosely correlated | -3.16% | ||
More | ||||
SLYV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SLYV has been closely correlated with SBCF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SLYV jumps, then SBCF could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SLYV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SLYV | 100% | -0.93% | ||
| SBCF - SLYV | 84% Closely correlated | -0.09% | ||
| WSFS - SLYV | 84% Closely correlated | -2.97% | ||
| UCB - SLYV | 83% Closely correlated | -0.91% | ||
| SFBS - SLYV | 83% Closely correlated | -1.50% | ||
| ABCB - SLYV | 83% Closely correlated | -0.41% | ||
More | ||||