IWO | SPC | IWO / SPC | |
Gain YTD | -3.895 | 2.917 | -134% |
Net Assets | 11.3B | 32M | 35,313% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.24 | 0.87 | 28% |
Turnover | 34.00 | 146.32 | 23% |
Yield | 0.87 | 5.18 | 17% |
Fund Existence | 25 years | 4 years | - |
IWO | SPC | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago85% | 19 days ago17% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago83% | N/A |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago83% | 19 days ago28% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 19 days ago15% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago87% | 19 days ago23% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago84% | 19 days ago23% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago87% | 19 days ago32% |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 24 days ago20% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago74% | 19 days ago57% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago86% | 19 days ago18% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWO has been loosely correlated with SSD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IWO jumps, then SSD could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that SPC and ESHA have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SPC and ESHA's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SPC | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
SPC | 100% | -0.03% | ||
ESHA - SPC | 24% Poorly correlated | +0.37% | ||
RCFAF - SPC | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
TRTLF - SPC | 11% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
MNTN - SPC | 11% Poorly correlated | -1.09% | ||
SLAMF - SPC | 10% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |