IWSH
Price
$0.13
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Apr 25 closing price
Capitalization
2.89M
XITO
Price
$0.03
Change
+$0.01 (+50.00%)
Updated
Dec 27 closing price
Capitalization
30.41M
Ad is loading...

IWSH vs XITO

Header iconIWSH vs XITO Comparison
Open Charts IWSH vs XITOBanner chart's image
Wright Investors' Service Holdings
Price$0.13
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.2K
Capitalization2.89M
XENOUS
Price$0.03
Change+$0.01 (+50.00%)
Volume$9.2K
Capitalization30.41M
IWSH vs XITO Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IWSH vs. XITO commentary
May 13, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IWSH is a Hold and XITO is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 13, 2025
Stock price -- (IWSH: $0.13 vs. XITO: $0.03)
Brand notoriety: IWSH and XITO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IWSH: 25% vs. XITO: 100%
Market capitalization -- IWSH: $2.89M vs. XITO: $30.41M
IWSH [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $2.89M. XITO’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $30.41M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $4.31B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IWSH’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileXITO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • IWSH’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • XITO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, XITO is a better buy in the long-term than IWSH.

Price Growth

IWSH (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while XITO (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +0.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +16.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.69%.

Reported Earning Dates

IWSH is expected to report earnings on Mar 27, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (+0.63% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XITO($30.4M) has a higher market cap than IWSH($2.89M). XITO YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. IWSH (-40.909). XITO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -58.52K vs. IWSH (-1.23M). IWSH has more cash in the bank: 3.97M vs. XITO (0). IWSH has less debt than XITO: IWSH (53K) vs XITO (748K). IWSH (0) and XITO (0) have equivalent revenues.
IWSHXITOIWSH / XITO
Capitalization2.89M30.4M9%
EBITDA-1.23M-58.52K2,109%
Gain YTD-40.9090.000-
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash3.97M0-
Total Debt53K748K7%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IWSH vs XITO: Fundamental Ratings
IWSH
XITO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
55
Fair valued
34
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
93100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7856
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

XITO's Valuation (34) in the null industry is in the same range as IWSH (55). This means that XITO’s stock grew similarly to IWSH’s over the last 12 months.

XITO's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as IWSH (100). This means that XITO’s stock grew similarly to IWSH’s over the last 12 months.

IWSH's SMR Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as XITO (100). This means that IWSH’s stock grew similarly to XITO’s over the last 12 months.

XITO's Price Growth Rating (56) in the null industry is in the same range as IWSH (78). This means that XITO’s stock grew similarly to IWSH’s over the last 12 months.

XITO's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as IWSH (100). This means that XITO’s stock grew similarly to IWSH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FOBPX19.11N/A
N/A
Tributary Balanced Instl Plus
MUBFX31.77-0.02
-0.06%
NYLI WMC Value Class I
JUESX23.72-0.02
-0.08%
JPMorgan US Equity I
QUASX56.78-0.17
-0.30%
AB Small Cap Growth A
GSBEX14.62-0.07
-0.48%
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Growth R6

IWSH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IWSH and ABVN have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IWSH and ABVN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IWSH
1D Price
Change %
IWSH100%
N/A
ABVN - IWSH
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
XITO - IWSH
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SRBT - IWSH
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WHLT - IWSH
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TGLO - IWSH
3%
Poorly correlated
+5.42%
More