IX
Price
$23.09
Change
-$0.09 (-0.39%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
26.23B
11 days until earnings call
UMAC
Price
$10.94
Change
-$0.43 (-3.78%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
15.89M
18 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

IX vs UMAC

Header iconIX vs UMAC Comparison
Open Charts IX vs UMACBanner chart's image
Orix
Price$23.09
Change-$0.09 (-0.39%)
Volume$81.09K
Capitalization26.23B
Unusual Machines
Price$10.94
Change-$0.43 (-3.78%)
Volume$3.85M
Capitalization15.89M
IX vs UMAC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
IX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UMAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IX vs. UMAC commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IX is a Buy and UMAC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (IX: $23.08)
Brand notoriety:
Market capitalization --

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IX’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green while.

  • IX’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IX’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UMAC’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IX’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • UMAC’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, IX is a better buy in the short-term than UMAC.

Price Growth

IX (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а +3.27% price change this weekfor the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +0.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +90.85%.

Reported Earning Dates

IX is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (+0.92% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IX($26.2B) has a higher market cap than UMAC($15.9M). IX YTD gains are higher at: 8.632 vs. UMAC (-34.958). IX has higher revenues than UMAC: IX (1.88T) vs UMAC (0).
IXUMACIX / UMAC
Capitalization26.2B15.9M164,780%
EBITDAN/A-1.79M-
Gain YTD8.632-34.958-25%
P/E Ratio11.00N/A-
Revenue1.88T0-
Total CashN/A895K-
Total Debt6.51TN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IX: Fundamental Ratings
IX
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
41
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
17
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
13
SMR RATING
1..100
1
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
49
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
65
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IXUMAC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UMAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MVRL15.200.09
+0.61%
ETRACS Mnthly Py 1.5X Lvgd Mtg REIT ETN
PTY13.850.03
+0.22%
PIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunity Fund
FMCX33.90N/A
N/A
FMC Excelsior Focus Equity ETF
LIVR27.26N/A
N/A
Intelligent Livermore ETF
GQRE60.52-0.10
-0.16%
FlexShares Glbl Quality Real Estate ETF

UMAC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that UMAC and SPKLU have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that UMAC and SPKLU's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UMAC
1D Price
Change %
UMAC100%
-3.78%
SPKLU - UMAC
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ISRLU - UMAC
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FRHC - UMAC
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.28%
IX - UMAC
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.43%
TREE - UMAC
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.54%
More