IXJ
Price
$92.34
Change
+$0.42 (+0.46%)
Updated
Jun 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
3.61B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
XLV
Price
$147.51
Change
+$1.11 (+0.76%)
Updated
Jun 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
37.19B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

IXJ vs XLV

Header iconIXJ vs XLV Comparison
Open Charts IXJ vs XLVBanner chart's image
IXJ vs XLV Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? iShares Global Healthcare ETF (IXJ) vs. State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLV)

Key Takeaways

  • IXJ provides diversified global healthcare exposure across 114 holdings, including significant non-US names like Roche and AstraZeneca, contrasting XLV's concentrated US large-cap focus with 60 holdings from the S&P 500 healthcare sector.
  • XLV offers superior cost efficiency with a 0.08% expense ratio versus IXJ's 0.40%, making it more attractive for long-term holding on a pure cost basis.
  • Both ETFs exhibit low volatility profiles typical of healthcare, but IXJ's international diversification may provide a slight edge in relative stability during US-specific market rotations.
  • XLV demonstrates markedly higher liquidity, with average daily volumes exceeding 10 million shares and tighter bid-ask spreads (0.01%), compared to IXJ's approximately 100,000 shares daily.
  • Top holdings overlap substantially (e.g., LLY and JNJ), but IXJ allocates more to pharmaceuticals with global reach, while XLV emphasizes US providers like UNH.
  • In recent market cycles, both have shown resilience amid sector headwinds, with IXJ slightly outperforming on a year-to-date basis due to international momentum.

Introduction

IXJ and XLV represent compelling options for investors seeking defensive sector exposure in healthcare, a resilient industry driven by aging demographics and innovation. While both target healthcare equities, they diverge structurally: IXJ delivers broad global coverage, capturing multinational pharmaceuticals and biotech leaders, whereas XLV focuses exclusively on large-cap US firms from the S&P 500 Health Care Select Sector Index. This comparison is particularly relevant amid recent capital rotations into defensives, policy shifts easing drug pricing pressures, and macroeconomic uncertainty favoring low-volatility assets. Investors weighing international diversification against US-centric liquidity and cost efficiency will find these ETFs as strategic alternatives for portfolio positioning in the current environment.

iShares Global Healthcare ETF (IXJ) Overview

The iShares Global Healthcare ETF (IXJ) is a passive ETF that seeks to track the S&P Global 1200 Health Care Index (transitioning to the S&P Global 1200 Health Care (Sector) Capped Index in early 2026). It provides exposure to global equities in the healthcare sector, including pharmaceuticals, biotechnology, and medical devices. With approximately $3.6 billion in assets under management (AUM), IXJ holds 114 securities, offering robust diversification.

Top holdings include LLY (9.96%), JNJ (7.07%), ABBV (4.72%), UNH (4.67%), and Roche Holding (3.87%), blending US giants with European leaders like AstraZeneca and Novartis. Sector allocations emphasize Pharma, Biotech & Life Sciences (68.90%) and Health Care Equipment & Services (30.43%). The expense ratio is 0.40%, and it exhibits solid liquidity with a 30-day average daily volume of about 95,000 shares and a median bid-ask spread of 0.13%. IXJ's global mandate distinguishes it for investors pursuing worldwide healthcare trends without currency hedging.

State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLV) Overview

The State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLV) is a passive ETF tracking the Health Care Select Sector Index, comprising large-cap US healthcare companies from the S&P 500. Managing over $37 billion in AUM, XLV holds 60 securities, delivering concentrated exposure to pharmaceuticals, providers, biotech, and equipment makers.

Leading positions feature LLY (14.47%), JNJ (10.27%), ABBV (6.86%), UNH (6.63%), and MRK (5.32%). Allocations break down as Pharmaceuticals (36.21%), Health Care Providers & Services (19.20%), Biotechnology (18.19%), and Health Care Equipment & Supplies (17.15%). Its ultra-low expense ratio of 0.08% enhances cost efficiency, while exceptional liquidity shines through with daily volumes often surpassing 10 million shares and a 0.01% median bid-ask spread. XLV suits those prioritizing US market dominance and minimal fees.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The healthcare sector operates in a supportive yet challenged environment, buoyed by aging populations, rising chronic disease prevalence, and breakthroughs in AI-driven drug discovery and precision medicine. Recent ETF inflows hit five-year highs in late 2025 at $6.8 billion, reflecting renewed confidence post-policy clarity on drug pricing like the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA). Macro tailwinds include cooling inflation and steady consumer spending, though elevated interest rates and geopolitical tensions pose risks to capital costs.

Regulatory scrutiny persists on pricing and approvals, with ACA subsidy expirations potentially impacting enrollment. Capital flows favor defensives amid volatility, while sector risks encompass workforce shortages, supply chain pressures, and patent cliffs. Both ETFs benefit from these dynamics, with global innovation pipelines and US provider resilience as key catalysts in recent market cycles.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent months, both IXJ and XLV have navigated healthcare headwinds, posting year-to-date declines around 6%, with IXJ showing marginal outperformance (-5.95% vs. XLV's -6.93%). This relative strength for IXJ stems from international holdings buoyed by ex-US pharma momentum, amid US sector rotation away from mega-caps.

Over broader cycles, healthcare's low beta (around 0.6) underscores defensive appeal, with volatility metrics closely matched (IXJ ~4.3% monthly, XLV ~4.1%). XLV's concentration amplifies gains from top holdings like LLY during earnings beats, while IXJ's diversification tempers drawdowns in US policy-sensitive periods. Positioning favors both amid interest rate stabilization and biotech revival, though XLV edges in liquidity-driven efficiency.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization (market cap), technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener identifies trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening, empowering data-driven decisions across asset classes. Explore the AI Screener today to uncover hidden gems in sectors like healthcare.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors XLV with moderate conviction (65% probability of relative outperformance over the next cycle). This preference rests on XLV's superior cost structure, massive scale for liquidity, and concentrated exposure to high-momentum US large-caps amid domestic sector recovery. While IXJ's global diversification enhances risk-adjusted profiles in volatile regimes, XLV's efficiency and alignment with capital flows position it as the structural frontrunner absent major international catalysts.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
IXJ vs. XLV commentary
Jun 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IXJ is a Hold and XLV is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XLV has more net assets: 37.2B vs. IXJ (3.61B). XLV has a higher annual dividend yield than IXJ: XLV (-5.038) vs IXJ (-5.626). IXJ was incepted earlier than XLV: IXJ (25 years) vs XLV (27 years). XLV (0.08) has a lower expense ratio than IXJ (0.40). IXJ has a higher turnover XLV (2.00) vs XLV (2.00).
IXJXLVIXJ / XLV
Gain YTD-5.626-5.038112%
Net Assets3.61B37.2B10%
Total Expense Ratio0.400.08500%
Turnover5.002.00250%
Yield1.441.6886%
Fund Existence25 years27 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IXJXLV
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IXJ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
XLV
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TCV32.250.41
+1.29%
Towle Value ETF
SLYG109.210.70
+0.65%
State Street® SPDR® S&P 600™ Sm Cp GrETF
NPFD18.99N/A
N/A
Nuveen Variable Rate Preferred & Income Fund
PEVC31.17N/A
N/A
Pacer PE/VC ETF
QQQU59.95-1.16
-1.90%
Direxion Daily Concentrated Qs Bull 2X Shares

IXJ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IXJ has been closely correlated with MRK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IXJ jumps, then MRK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IXJ
1D Price
Change %
IXJ100%
-1.14%
MRK - IXJ
68%
Closely correlated
+0.42%
AMGN - IXJ
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.26%
GSK - IXJ
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.63%
BMY - IXJ
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.89%
LLY - IXJ
63%
Loosely correlated
-1.67%
More

XLV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XLV has been closely correlated with MRK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XLV jumps, then MRK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To XLV
1D Price
Change %
XLV100%
-0.97%
MRK - XLV
68%
Closely correlated
+0.42%
LLY - XLV
66%
Closely correlated
-1.67%
AMGN - XLV
66%
Closely correlated
-0.26%
BMY - XLV
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.89%
PFE - XLV
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.31%
More