IXN
Price
$138.96
Change
-$0.63 (-0.45%)
Updated
Aug 19, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
9.52B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
VGT
Price
$118.83
Change
-$0.96 (-0.80%)
Updated
Aug 19, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
160.62B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

IXN vs VGT

IXN vs VGT Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 16, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? iShares Global Tech ETF (IXN) vs. Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT)

Key Takeaways

  • IXN provides global exposure to the technology sector with approximately 127 holdings, including significant allocations to companies domiciled outside the United States such as those in Taiwan and South Korea, while VGT focuses exclusively on U.S. information technology stocks with roughly 314 to 327 holdings.
  • VGT offers a substantially lower expense ratio of 0.09% compared to IXN’s 0.37%, making it more cost-efficient for long-term investors seeking U.S.-centric technology exposure.
  • Both ETFs are passively managed and track indices concentrated in semiconductors, hardware, and software, resulting in similar thematic exposure but differing geographic diversification and concentration profiles.
  • IXN’s broader geographic reach introduces additional currency and regulatory risks not present in VGT, while VGT benefits from greater liquidity and a more concentrated focus on large-cap U.S. technology leaders.
  • Sector allocations in both funds are heavily weighted toward semiconductors and semiconductor equipment, which have driven performance during recent market cycles amid advancements in artificial intelligence and computing.
  • Investors prioritizing cost efficiency and U.S. market leadership may lean toward VGT, whereas those seeking international diversification within technology may prefer IXN despite its higher expense ratio.

Introduction

Technology sector ETFs have gained prominence amid ongoing innovation in artificial intelligence, semiconductors, and digital infrastructure. IXN and VGT both target information technology equities yet differ meaningfully in scope and structure. IXN delivers global technology exposure, while VGT confines its mandate to U.S. companies. These distinctions make the two funds useful alternatives rather than direct competitors for investors seeking sector exposure with varying degrees of geographic diversification and cost considerations.

iShares Global Tech ETF (IXN) Overview

The iShares Global Tech ETF seeks to track the S&P Global 1200 Information Technology 4.5/22.5/45 Capped Index, providing exposure to global equities in the technology sector. The fund holds approximately 127 securities and maintains a passive, full-replication approach where feasible. Geographic allocation shows roughly 77% in the United States, with notable positions in Taiwan, South Korea, Japan, and other markets. Sector breakdown as of recent data emphasizes semiconductors and semiconductor equipment at nearly 50%, followed by tech hardware and equipment at about 27%, and software and services at approximately 22%. The expense ratio stands at 0.37%. Distinguishing features include its international diversification and capped index methodology designed to limit single-stock concentration.

Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) Overview

The Vanguard Information Technology ETF aims to track the performance of the MSCI U.S. Investable Market 25/50 Information Technology Index, focusing on U.S. companies classified within the information technology sector. The fund holds between 314 and 327 securities and employs a passive indexing strategy with full replication when possible. All holdings are domiciled in the United States. Sector allocations mirror the broader technology landscape with heavy emphasis on semiconductors, hardware, and software. The expense ratio is 0.09%, among the lowest in the category. Key structural characteristics include its exclusive U.S. focus, broad market-capitalization coverage within the domestic technology space, and high liquidity profile.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The information technology sector continues to benefit from structural tailwinds including artificial intelligence adoption, data center expansion, and semiconductor demand. Capital flows into technology-related strategies have remained elevated across recent market cycles. Macroeconomic factors such as interest rate trajectories and corporate capital expenditure trends influence sector performance. Regulatory developments around export controls on advanced chips and antitrust scrutiny represent ongoing risks. Both ETFs are positioned to capture growth from these themes, though IXN’s global holdings introduce exposure to supply-chain dynamics in Asia that VGT does not share.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, both ETFs have exhibited strong sensitivity to earnings growth among leading semiconductor and software companies. IXN’s international exposure has at times provided modest differentiation during periods of regional outperformance outside the United States. VGT’s lower cost structure and exclusive focus on U.S. large-cap technology names have contributed to competitive relative positioning in domestic-led rallies. Volatility profiles remain elevated for both funds due to concentration in high-growth technology subsectors. Relative performance has fluctuated with sector rotation patterns and shifts in investor sentiment toward growth versus value styles.

AI Screener

AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Visit the AI Screener to explore current opportunities.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on structural strength, cost efficiency, and alignment with prevailing sector momentum, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probabilistic preference to VGT. Its materially lower expense ratio and exclusive focus on high-liquidity U.S. technology leaders provide a more streamlined exposure profile for investors seeking core technology sector participation without added geographic complexity.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
IXN vs. VGT commentary
Aug 20, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IXN is a Hold and VGT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VGT has more net assets: 161B vs. IXN (9.52B). IXN has a higher annual dividend yield than VGT: IXN (33.102) vs VGT (27.287). IXN was incepted earlier than VGT: IXN (25 years) vs VGT (23 years). VGT (0.09) has a lower expense ratio than IXN (0.39). IXN has a higher turnover VGT (8.00) vs VGT (8.00).
IXNVGTIXN / VGT
Gain YTD33.10227.287121%
Net Assets9.52B161B6%
Total Expense Ratio0.390.09433%
Turnover32.008.00400%
Yield0.260.3867%
Fund Existence25 years23 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IXNVGT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
87%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IXN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
VGT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ASTN4.490.48
+11.97%
Defiance Daily Target 2X Short ASTS ETF
CALI50.35-0.03
-0.07%
iShares Short-Term CA Muni Act ETF
PALU59.64-0.52
-0.86%
Direxion Daily PANW Bull 2X Shares
IPAC84.74-1.82
-2.10%
iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF
KEMX49.17-1.74
-3.42%
KraneShares MSCI Em Mkts ex CHN ETF

IXN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IXN has been closely correlated with STM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IXN jumps, then STM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IXN
1D Price
Change %
IXN100%
-3.08%
STM - IXN
85%
Closely correlated
-6.31%
GLW - IXN
65%
Loosely correlated
-7.68%
KEYS - IXN
61%
Loosely correlated
-5.58%
ANET - IXN
58%
Loosely correlated
-4.27%
APH - IXN
55%
Loosely correlated
-6.61%
More

VGT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VGT has been closely correlated with ONTO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if VGT jumps, then ONTO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VGT
1D Price
Change %
VGT100%
-2.24%
ONTO - VGT
70%
Closely correlated
-10.18%
VSH - VGT
65%
Loosely correlated
-5.79%
COHR - VGT
64%
Loosely correlated
-12.75%
FN - VGT
62%
Loosely correlated
-19.38%
GLW - VGT
62%
Loosely correlated
-7.68%
More