It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
J’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while.
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
J’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
J (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а +1.00% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was -1.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.05%.
J is expected to report earnings on Feb 11, 2025.
Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.
J | ||
---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 80 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 74 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 13 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 94 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 41 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 46 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
J | SPVM | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago86% | 1 day ago90% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago51% | 1 day ago84% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago50% | 1 day ago73% |
MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago62% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago63% | 1 day ago74% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago66% | 1 day ago72% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago59% | 1 day ago84% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago48% | 7 days ago71% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago64% | 1 day ago90% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 7 days ago50% | 1 day ago74% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, J has been loosely correlated with ACM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if J jumps, then ACM could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SPVM has been loosely correlated with BKR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SPVM jumps, then BKR could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SPVM | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
SPVM | 100% | +0.75% | ||
BKR - SPVM | 63% Loosely correlated | +1.59% | ||
CTRA - SPVM | 58% Loosely correlated | +2.78% | ||
J - SPVM | 55% Loosely correlated | +0.53% | ||
TPR - SPVM | 40% Loosely correlated | +0.85% | ||
NVR - SPVM | 18% Poorly correlated | +0.45% | ||
More |