JDNRF
Price
$0.03
Change
+$0.01 (+50.00%)
Updated
Oct 21 closing price
MPVDF
Price
$0.07
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
91 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

JDNRF vs MPVDF

Header iconJDNRF vs MPVDF Comparison
Open Charts JDNRF vs MPVDFBanner chart's image
Jayden Resources
Price$0.03
Change+$0.01 (+50.00%)
Volume$10K
CapitalizationN/A
Mountain Province Diamonds
Price$0.07
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2K
CapitalizationN/A
JDNRF vs MPVDF Comparison Chart
Loading...
JDNRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MPVDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
JDNRF vs. MPVDF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JDNRF is a Hold and MPVDF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (JDNRF: $0.03 vs. MPVDF: $0.08)
Brand notoriety: JDNRF and MPVDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: JDNRF: 112% vs. MPVDF: 9%
Market capitalization -- JDNRF: $4.64M vs. MPVDF: $71.6M
JDNRF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $4.64M. MPVDF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $71.6M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

JDNRF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMPVDF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • JDNRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MPVDF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both JDNRF and MPVDF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

JDNRF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MPVDF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • JDNRF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • MPVDF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, JDNRF is a better buy in the short-term than MPVDF.

Price Growth

JDNRF (@Precious Metals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MPVDF (@Precious Metals) price change was -23.90% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -5.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.01%.

Reported Earning Dates

MPVDF is expected to report earnings on Mar 20, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-5.24% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MPVDF($71.6M) has a higher market cap than JDNRF($4.64M). JDNRF YTD gains are higher at: -34.025 vs. MPVDF (-57.202). MPVDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 392M vs. JDNRF (-715.25K). MPVDF has more cash in the bank: 79.3M vs. JDNRF (418K). MPVDF has higher revenues than JDNRF: MPVDF (378M) vs JDNRF (0).
JDNRFMPVDFJDNRF / MPVDF
Capitalization4.64M71.6M6%
EBITDA-715.25K392M-0%
Gain YTD-34.025-57.20259%
P/E RatioN/A0.36-
Revenue0378M-
Total Cash418K79.3M1%
Total DebtN/A405M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
JDNRF vs MPVDF: Fundamental Ratings
JDNRF
MPVDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3869
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
43
Fair valued
24
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9112
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8485
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
492
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MPVDF's Valuation (24) in the null industry is in the same range as JDNRF (43). This means that MPVDF’s stock grew similarly to JDNRF’s over the last 12 months.

MPVDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as JDNRF (100). This means that MPVDF’s stock grew similarly to JDNRF’s over the last 12 months.

MPVDF's SMR Rating (12) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for JDNRF (91). This means that MPVDF’s stock grew significantly faster than JDNRF’s over the last 12 months.

JDNRF's Price Growth Rating (84) in the null industry is in the same range as MPVDF (85). This means that JDNRF’s stock grew similarly to MPVDF’s over the last 12 months.

JDNRF's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MPVDF (92). This means that JDNRF’s stock grew significantly faster than MPVDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
JDNRFMPVDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
JDNRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MPVDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SMX0.30N/A
+1.28%
SMX (Security Matters) Public Limited
ACNT11.45-0.05
-0.43%
Ascent Industries Co
KEP7.48-0.07
-0.93%
Korea Electric Power Corp
CMPR78.53-1.96
-2.44%
Cimpress plc
KRT31.38-0.96
-2.97%
Karat Packaging

JDNRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that JDNRF and CRNLF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that JDNRF and CRNLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JDNRF
1D Price
Change %
JDNRF100%
N/A
CRNLF - JDNRF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SBUM - JDNRF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MPVDF - JDNRF
21%
Poorly correlated
-3.45%
CNDGF - JDNRF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A

MPVDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MPVDF and JDNRF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MPVDF and JDNRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MPVDF
1D Price
Change %
MPVDF100%
-3.45%
JDNRF - MPVDF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NSVLF - MPVDF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HAMRF - MPVDF
11%
Poorly correlated
+110.97%
SBUM - MPVDF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TFPM - MPVDF
8%
Poorly correlated
-0.31%
More