Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JEMZX vs RNWBX
JEMZX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts JEMZX vs RNWBX
JHancock Emerging Markets Equity C
Price$9.44
Change-$0.11 (-1.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.26B
American Funds New World R2
Price$80.35
Change-$0.38 (-0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets66.46B
JEMZX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JEMZX vs. RNWBX commentary
Jun 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JEMZX is a Buy and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 66.5B vs. JEMZX (1.26B). RNWBX pays higher dividends than JEMZX: RNWBX (0.13) vs JEMZX (0.00). JEMZX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: JEMZX (10 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). JEMZX (2.17) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). JEMZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than JEMZX: RNWBX (250) vs JEMZX (1000). RNWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.26 vs. JEMZX (5.71). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 30.88 vs. JEMZX (-5.58).
| JEMZX | RNWBX | JEMZX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.01 | 1.67 | 120% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.17 | 1.67 | 130% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.509 | 9.245 | 38% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.26B | 66.5B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.13 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.71 | 6.26 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.91 | 19.67 | 10% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.58 | 30.88 | -18% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 49.54 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers