Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JEMZX vs RNWHX
JEMZX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts JEMZX vs RNWHX
JHancock Emerging Markets Equity C
Price$9.44
Change-$0.11 (-1.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.26B
American Funds New World R5E
Price$83.37
Change-$0.40 (-0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets66.46B
JEMZX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JEMZX vs. RNWHX commentary
Jun 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JEMZX is a Buy and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 66.5B vs. JEMZX (1.26B). RNWHX pays higher dividends than JEMZX: RNWHX (1.04) vs JEMZX (0.00). JEMZX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: JEMZX (10 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). JEMZX (2.17) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). JEMZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. RNWHX (37.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than JEMZX: RNWHX (250) vs JEMZX (1000). RNWHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.35 vs. JEMZX (5.71). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 35.87 vs. JEMZX (-5.58).
| JEMZX | RNWHX | JEMZX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.01 | 0.72 | 279% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.17 | 0.72 | 301% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.509 | 9.669 | 36% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.26B | 66.5B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.04 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.71 | 7.35 | 78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.91 | 22.06 | 9% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.58 | 35.87 | -16% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |