Ad is loading...
JHBCX vs RGAGX
JHBCX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts JHBCX vs RGAGX
JHancock Blue Chip Growth NAV
Price$54.04
Change+$1.04 (+1.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.69B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$67.32
Change+$1.06 (+1.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets260.89B
JHBCX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JHBCX vs. RGAGX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JHBCX is a Buy and RGAGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 261B vs. JHBCX (4.69B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than JHBCX: RGAGX (0.71) vs JHBCX (0.00). JHBCX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: JHBCX (20 years) vs RGAGX (16 years). JHBCX (0.77) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). RGAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. JHBCX (12.00). JHBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAGX: JHBCX (0) vs RGAGX (250). JHBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.72 vs. RGAGX (-4.89). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 49.17 vs. JHBCX (32.10).
| JHBCX | RGAGX | JHBCX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.30 | 253% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.30 | 257% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -12.915 | -9.698 | 133% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.69B | 261B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.71 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.72 | -4.89 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.20 | 7.71 | 184% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.10 | 49.17 | 65% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.18 | 52.69 | 93% |