Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JHBCX vs RGAGX
JHBCX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts JHBCX vs RGAGX
JHancock Blue Chip Growth NAV
Price$66.64
Change+$0.03 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.77B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$83.78
Change-$0.12 (-0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets325.7B
JHBCX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JHBCX vs. RGAGX commentary
Jul 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JHBCX is a StrongBuy and RGAGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 326B vs. JHBCX (5.77B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than JHBCX: RGAGX (0.61) vs JHBCX (0.00). JHBCX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: JHBCX (20 years) vs RGAGX (16 years). JHBCX (0.77) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). RGAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. JHBCX (12.00). JHBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAGX: JHBCX (0) vs RGAGX (250). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.16 vs. JHBCX (11.72). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 48.41 vs. JHBCX (30.99).
| JHBCX | RGAGX | JHBCX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.30 | 253% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.30 | 257% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.448 | 12.542 | 75% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.77B | 326B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.61 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.72 | 13.16 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 74.23 | 61.56 | 121% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.99 | 48.41 | 64% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.22 | 85.47 | 92% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers