Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JHBCX vs RGAGX
JHBCX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts JHBCX vs RGAGX
JHancock Blue Chip Growth NAV
Price$63.15
Change+$0.67 (+1.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.51B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$78.75
Change+$0.76 (+0.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets304.87B
JHBCX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JHBCX vs. RGAGX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JHBCX is a Buy and RGAGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 305B vs. JHBCX (5.51B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than JHBCX: RGAGX (0.65) vs JHBCX (0.00). JHBCX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: JHBCX (20 years) vs RGAGX (16 years). JHBCX (0.77) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). RGAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. JHBCX (12.00). JHBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAGX: JHBCX (0) vs RGAGX (250). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.74 vs. JHBCX (7.97). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 47.09 vs. JHBCX (30.57).
| JHBCX | RGAGX | JHBCX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.30 | 253% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.30 | 257% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.662 | 5.634 | 47% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.51B | 305B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.65 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.97 | 9.74 | 82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.72 | 38.58 | 134% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.57 | 47.09 | 65% |
| Returns for 10 years | 77.36 | 77.83 | 99% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement