Ad is loading...
JHBCX vs RGAGX
JHBCX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts JHBCX vs RGAGX
JHancock Blue Chip Growth NAV
Price$60.07
Change+$2.42 (+4.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.13B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$75.50
Change+$2.77 (+3.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets285.48B
JHBCX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JHBCX vs. RGAGX commentary
May 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JHBCX is a Buy and RGAGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 285B vs. JHBCX (5.13B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than JHBCX: RGAGX (0.70) vs JHBCX (0.00). JHBCX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: JHBCX (20 years) vs RGAGX (16 years). JHBCX (0.77) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). RGAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. JHBCX (12.00). JHBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAGX: JHBCX (0) vs RGAGX (250). JHBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.74 vs. RGAGX (3.49). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 49.85 vs. JHBCX (32.16).
| JHBCX | RGAGX | JHBCX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.30 | 253% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.30 | 257% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.274 | -2.441 | 216% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.13B | 285B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.70 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.74 | 3.49 | 136% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.63 | 31.92 | 140% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.16 | 49.85 | 65% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.36 | 62.29 | 99% |