Ad is loading...
JHQCX vs SNOAX
JHQCX vs SNOAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JHQCX vs. SNOAX commentary
May 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JHQCX is a Buy and SNOAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JHQCX has more cash in the bank: 20.4B vs. SNOAX (87.2M). SNOAX pays higher dividends than JHQCX: SNOAX (1.33) vs JHQCX (0.09). JHQCX was incepted earlier than SNOAX: JHQCX (11 years) vs SNOAX (19 years). SNOAX (1.61) is less costly to investors than JHQCX (1.33). JHQCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. SNOAX (21.00). JHQCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SNOAX: JHQCX (1000) vs SNOAX (2500). JHQCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.39 vs. SNOAX (-4.13). JHQCX (48.04) and SNOAX (47.40) have equivalent 5 years return.
| JHQCX | SNOAX | JHQCX / SNOAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 1.61 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 1.61 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.582 | -0.682 | 671% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 20.4B | 87.2M | 23,394% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.09 | 1.33 | 7% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.39 | -4.13 | -155% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.36 | 4.99 | 628% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.04 | 47.40 | 101% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.79 | 27.82 | 334% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers