Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JMOM vs QUS
JMOM vs QUS Comparison
Open Charts JMOM vs QUS
JPMorgan US Momentum Factor ETF
Price$62.17
Change+$0.68 (+1.11%)
Volume$1.4K
Net Assets1.47B
SPDR® MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF
Price$159.82
Change+$0.88 (+0.55%)
Volume$320
Net Assets1.54B
JMOM vs QUS Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JMOM vs. QUS commentary
Jun 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JMOM is a Hold and QUS is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QUS (1.54B) and JMOM (1.47B) have similar net assets . JMOM has a higher annual dividend yield than QUS: JMOM (5.730) vs QUS (3.287). JMOM was incepted earlier than QUS: JMOM (8 years) vs QUS (10 years). JMOM (0.12) has a lower expense ratio than QUS (0.15). JMOM has a higher turnover QUS (13.00) vs QUS (13.00).
| JMOM | QUS | JMOM / QUS | |
| Gain YTD | 5.730 | 3.287 | 174% |
| Net Assets | 1.47B | 1.54B | 96% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.12 | 0.15 | 80% |
| Turnover | 40.00 | 13.00 | 308% |
| Yield | 0.82 | 1.45 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 10 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| JMOM | QUS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 63% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 4 days ago 68% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | 4 days ago 68% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 4 days ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 85% | 14 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 19 days ago 78% | 12 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 70% | 4 days ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
JMOM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, JMOM has been closely correlated with KEYS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if JMOM jumps, then KEYS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To JMOM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JMOM | 100% | -1.09% | ||
| KEYS - JMOM | 84% Closely correlated | -2.35% | ||
| JHG - JMOM | 83% Closely correlated | -2.38% | ||
| ACN - JMOM | 83% Closely correlated | -2.02% | ||
| ANSS - JMOM | 83% Closely correlated | -1.60% | ||
| MSCI - JMOM | 79% Closely correlated | -2.24% | ||
More | ||||
QUS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QUS has been loosely correlated with MA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QUS jumps, then MA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QUS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QUS | 100% | -1.18% | ||
| MA - QUS | 62% Loosely correlated | -4.62% | ||
| V - QUS | 61% Loosely correlated | -4.99% | ||
| AVGO - QUS | 59% Loosely correlated | -2.88% | ||
| MSFT - QUS | 54% Loosely correlated | -0.82% | ||
| AAPL - QUS | 53% Loosely correlated | -1.38% | ||
More | ||||