JNCCF
Price
$0.02
Change
+$0.01 (+100.00%)
Updated
Dec 31 closing price
Capitalization
1.1M
MGMLF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
33.26M
Ad is loading...

JNCCF vs MGMLF

Header iconJNCCF vs MGMLF Comparison
Open Charts JNCCF vs MGMLFBanner chart's image
Metalite Resources
Price$0.02
Change+$0.01 (+100.00%)
Volume$125
Capitalization1.1M
Maple Gold Mines
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$29.49K
Capitalization33.26M
JNCCF vs MGMLF Comparison Chart
Loading...
JNCCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MGMLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
JNCCF vs. MGMLF commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JNCCF is a Hold and MGMLF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (JNCCF: $0.02 vs. MGMLF: $0.04)
Brand notoriety: JNCCF and MGMLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: JNCCF: 2% vs. MGMLF: 19%
Market capitalization -- JNCCF: $1.1M vs. MGMLF: $33.26M
JNCCF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $1.1M. MGMLF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $33.26M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

JNCCF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMGMLF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • JNCCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MGMLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, JNCCF is a better buy in the long-term than MGMLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

JNCCF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MGMLF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • JNCCF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MGMLF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, JNCCF is a better buy in the short-term than MGMLF.

Price Growth

JNCCF (@Precious Metals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MGMLF (@Precious Metals) price change was -1.91% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +2.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.47%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+2.38% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MGMLF($33.3M) has a higher market cap than JNCCF($1.1M). JNCCF YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. MGMLF (-3.614). JNCCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -5.98M vs. MGMLF (-10.27M). MGMLF has more cash in the bank: 8.54M vs. JNCCF (252K). JNCCF (0) and MGMLF (0) have equivalent revenues.
JNCCFMGMLFJNCCF / MGMLF
Capitalization1.1M33.3M3%
EBITDA-5.98M-10.27M58%
Gain YTD0.000-3.614-
P/E Ratio2.01N/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash252K8.54M3%
Total DebtN/A440K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MGMLF: Fundamental Ratings
MGMLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
87
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
98
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
63
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
JNCCFMGMLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
84%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
89%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
JNCCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MGMLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PABYX16.150.09
+0.56%
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Bal Y
TASHX14.640.07
+0.48%
Transamerica Multi-Asset Income A
HBLTX14.480.04
+0.28%
Hartford Balanced Income R5
WESWX11.23N/A
N/A
TETON Westwood Equity AAA
JYEBX12.23-0.03
-0.24%
JHancock Real Estate Securities A

JNCCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that JNCCF and AAMMF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that JNCCF and AAMMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JNCCF
1D Price
Change %
JNCCF100%
N/A
AAMMF - JNCCF
31%
Poorly correlated
-11.50%
OICT - JNCCF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MGMLF - JNCCF
21%
Poorly correlated
-6.74%
MDSMF - JNCCF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SAPLF - JNCCF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MGMLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MGMLF and GSISF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MGMLF and GSISF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MGMLF
1D Price
Change %
MGMLF100%
-6.74%
GSISF - MGMLF
24%
Poorly correlated
-4.17%
APRAF - MGMLF
23%
Poorly correlated
-5.60%
GGLDF - MGMLF
22%
Poorly correlated
-4.74%
JNCCF - MGMLF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WRLGF - MGMLF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.22%
More