It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
JOUT’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileXPOF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
JOUT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while XPOF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
JOUT (@Recreational Products) experienced а -4.91% price change this week, while XPOF (@Recreational Products) price change was -8.78% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Recreational Products industry was -5.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.14%.
JOUT is expected to report earnings on Jan 31, 2025.
XPOF is expected to report earnings on Feb 27, 2025.
The Leisure and Recreation Products industry includes companies offering recreational goods/services such as video games, swimming pools, golf courses, boats, outdoor spaces etc. Since these are mainly geared towards consumers, strong employment conditions and healthy incomes generally augur well for the recreational products industry. Some of the largest market caps in this space belong to video game developers (e.g. Activision Blizzard, Electronic Arts and Take-two Interactive), and toy /board game makers (like Hasbro).
JOUT | XPOF | JOUT / XPOF | |
Capitalization | 474M | 501M | 95% |
EBITDA | 41.3M | 68M | 61% |
Gain YTD | -36.244 | 16.059 | -226% |
P/E Ratio | 26.49 | 58.48 | 45% |
Revenue | 624M | 319M | 196% |
Total Cash | 110M | 27.8M | 396% |
Total Debt | 53.5M | 407M | 13% |
JOUT | ||
---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 14 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 28 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 87 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 76 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 2 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
JOUT | XPOF | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago52% | 3 days ago76% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago78% | 3 days ago82% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago64% | 3 days ago82% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago58% | 3 days ago83% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago73% | 3 days ago82% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago76% | 3 days ago87% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago60% | 10 days ago86% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago69% | 3 days ago82% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago74% | 3 days ago77% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago75% | 3 days ago84% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, JOUT has been loosely correlated with BC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if JOUT jumps, then BC could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To JOUT | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
JOUT | 100% | +0.03% | ||
BC - JOUT | 50% Loosely correlated | -0.84% | ||
LCII - JOUT | 49% Loosely correlated | +0.42% | ||
MCFT - JOUT | 49% Loosely correlated | -0.29% | ||
PII - JOUT | 47% Loosely correlated | -0.57% | ||
WGO - JOUT | 46% Loosely correlated | +0.16% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XPOF has been loosely correlated with THO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if XPOF jumps, then THO could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XPOF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
XPOF | 100% | -0.60% | ||
THO - XPOF | 34% Loosely correlated | -0.05% | ||
JOUT - XPOF | 32% Poorly correlated | +0.03% | ||
PLBY - XPOF | 31% Poorly correlated | +4.50% | ||
LTH - XPOF | 29% Poorly correlated | -0.46% | ||
MBUU - XPOF | 28% Poorly correlated | -0.67% | ||
More |