JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) and Wells Fargo & Co. (WFC) represent two pillars of the U.S. banking sector, offering investors exposure to diversified financial services amid evolving market dynamics. This stock comparison analyzes their recent performance, business models, and relative positioning, helping traders assess momentum plays and long-term investors evaluate stability and growth potential. With both navigating interest rate shifts, regulatory scrutiny, and economic uncertainties like geopolitical tensions, understanding their contrasts aids in portfolio allocation within the financials space.
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the largest U.S. bank by market capitalization, operating across consumer banking, investment banking, and asset management. Its diversified revenue streams include strong net interest income (NII) and trading activities. In recent market activity, JPM stock has traded around $310, reflecting resilience near 52-week highs despite a modest post-earnings pullback. First-quarter 2026 results highlighted record trading revenue and ROTCE (return on tangible common equity, a profitability measure excluding intangibles) of 23%, boosting sentiment. Influences include volatile markets favoring investment banking and CEO commentary on inflation risks, supporting positive relative performance.
Wells Fargo & Co. (WFC) focuses on consumer and commercial banking, with segments in lending, deposits, and wealth management. It emphasizes relationship banking post-regulatory challenges. Recently, WFC shares hovered near $81, showing stability but dipping after Q1 earnings due to revenue shortfalls. The quarter delivered net income growth to $5.3 billion, aided by trading gains and loan expansion, though NII fell short of expectations. Sentiment reflects ongoing efficiency efforts and dividend reliability, tempered by broader sector pressures like deposit competition.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the top 25 AI trading bots curated from over 351 available bots that trade thousands of tickers across various strategies, timeframes like 5-minute to 60-minute charts, and asset classes including stocks with different volatility levels. These bots employ diverse approaches such as signal generation, virtual portfolios, and brokerage integration, with performance metrics highlighting win rates, average returns, and trade volumes tailored to current market conditions. Only the highest-performing and most adaptive bots earn a spot in this dynamic section, helping traders identify timely opportunities. Explore the Trending AI Robots page to discover bots suited to your style.
JPM and WFC share sector exposure to interest rates and lending but diverge in business models: JPM leverages global investment banking for higher growth, while WFC prioritizes domestic retail stability. Recent momentum favors JPM with superior 1-year returns and earnings beats, versus WFC's YTD edge but post-earnings weakness. Risk factors include regulatory hurdles for both, though WFC carries legacy asset cap echoes; JPM faces private credit volatility. Market sentiment tilts toward JPM's scale and diversification amid trading volatility.
Tickeron’s AI currently favors JPM over WFC, driven by consistent trend strength, higher ROTCE, robust Q1 catalysts like trading revenue, and superior relative 1-year positioning. While WFC offers value via lower P/E and yield, JPM's stability and growth probability edge it in probabilistic models.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
JPM’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileWFC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
JPM’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WFC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
JPM (@Major Banks) experienced а +2.67% price change this week, while WFC (@Major Banks) price change was +2.18% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +3.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.81%.
JPM is expected to report earnings on Jul 14, 2026.
WFC is expected to report earnings on Jul 14, 2026.
Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.
| JPM | WFC | JPM / WFC | |
| Capitalization | 859B | 256B | 336% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.495 | -9.203 | -5% |
| P/E Ratio | 15.35 | 12.94 | 119% |
| Revenue | 186B | 85B | 219% |
| Total Cash | 21.7B | 33.5B | 65% |
| Total Debt | 517B | 216B | 239% |
JPM | WFC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 24 | 36 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 84 Overvalued | 62 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 15 | 25 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 2 | 4 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 27 | 47 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 35 | 54 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 34 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
WFC's Valuation (62) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as JPM (84). This means that WFC’s stock grew similarly to JPM’s over the last 12 months.
JPM's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as WFC (25). This means that JPM’s stock grew similarly to WFC’s over the last 12 months.
JPM's SMR Rating (2) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as WFC (4). This means that JPM’s stock grew similarly to WFC’s over the last 12 months.
JPM's Price Growth Rating (27) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as WFC (47). This means that JPM’s stock grew similarly to WFC’s over the last 12 months.
JPM's P/E Growth Rating (35) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as WFC (54). This means that JPM’s stock grew similarly to WFC’s over the last 12 months.
| JPM | WFC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 56% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 54% | 3 days ago 57% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 64% | 3 days ago 70% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 60% | 3 days ago 61% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 62% | 3 days ago 65% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 57% | 3 days ago 56% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 59% | 3 days ago 61% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 59% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 57% | 3 days ago 67% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 57% | 3 days ago 70% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, JPM has been closely correlated with C. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if JPM jumps, then C could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WFC has been closely correlated with BAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WFC jumps, then BAC could also see price increases.