JPM
Price
$353.13
Change
+$3.23 (+0.92%)
Updated
Jul 24, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
930.1B
81 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WFC
Price
$86.37
Change
+$0.18 (+0.21%)
Updated
Jul 24, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
261.03B
81 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

JPM vs WFC

JPM vs WFC Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 19, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? JPMorgan Chase (JPM) vs. Wells Fargo (WFC) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • JPMorgan Chase remains the largest U.S. bank by assets and posted record full-year revenue of $182 billion in 2025, underscoring the strength of its diversified business model.
  • Wells Fargo achieved a major regulatory milestone in mid-2025 when the Federal Reserve lifted its $1.95 trillion asset cap, unlocking balance-sheet expansion for the first time in nearly eight years.
  • Both banks face margin headwinds heading into 2026, but JPM guided for approximately $103 billion in net interest income (NII), versus roughly $50 billion for WFC, reflecting a dramatic difference in scale.
  • Wells Fargo's ongoing restructuring — including a $612 million severance charge and 5,600 job cuts in late 2025 — signals a leaner future, but near-term efficiency ratios remain elevated at 64%.
  • JPMorgan's return on tangible common equity (ROTCE, a key profitability metric that excludes intangible assets) of approximately 21% far outpaces Wells Fargo's 14.5%, highlighting a sizable profitability gap.
  • Investor sentiment has diverged: JPMorgan shares held relatively steady through earnings, while Wells Fargo shares dropped 4.6% following a revenue miss and cautious 2026 guidance.

Introduction

When evaluating the U.S. banking sector, few rivalries capture investor attention quite like the contrast between JPM — the nation's largest and most diversified financial institution — and WFC — a storied franchise working through a multi-year transformation. Both stocks belong to the "Big Four" U.S. banks and offer exposure to consumer banking, commercial lending, and capital markets. Yet their recent trajectories, growth profiles, and risk factors differ markedly. This comparison is particularly relevant for investors seeking to understand how scale, regulatory history, and strategic execution translate into stock performance. Whether you are a value-oriented investor watching Wells Fargo's turnaround or a growth-minded analyst tracking JPMorgan's fortress-like consistency, understanding the nuances between these two names is essential.

JPM Overview and Recent Performance

JPM, headquartered in New York, is the largest U.S. bank with approximately $4.4 trillion in assets and a market capitalization near $880 billion. Its operations span four main segments: Consumer & Community Banking (CCB), Corporate & Investment Bank (CIB), Commercial Banking, and Asset & Wealth Management (AWM). This diversification has historically allowed JPMorgan to generate resilient earnings across varying economic cycles.

In recent financial reporting, JPMorgan delivered full-year 2025 net income of approximately $57 billion on record annual revenue of $182 billion. Its Q4 2025 results featured revenue of $46.77 billion and adjusted earnings per share (EPS) of $5.23, comfortably surpassing consensus estimates. The firm's return on tangible common equity (ROTCE) hovered around 21%, well above the industry average, while its Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) capital ratio — a key measure of balance-sheet strength — stood at 14.5%, providing ample capacity for dividends and share repurchases.

Key developments in recent months include JPMorgan's integration of the Apple Card portfolio, acquired from Goldman Sachs, which required a $2.2 billion credit reserve build. CEO Jamie Dimon has emphasized continued investment in artificial intelligence, branch expansion, and payment systems, though management also signaled that 2026 expenses could reach $105 billion — roughly $4 billion above analyst expectations — due to compensation, technology, and infrastructure spending. The stock has generally outperformed the broader banking sector over the past year, reflecting confidence in its competitive positioning.

WFC Overview and Recent Performance

WFC, headquartered in San Francisco, is the fourth-largest U.S. bank with roughly $2.1 trillion in assets and a market capitalization near $294 billion. The bank operates through Consumer Banking and Lending, Commercial Banking, Corporate and Investment Banking, and Wealth and Investment Management segments. For years, Wells Fargo's growth story was constrained by a $1.95 trillion asset cap imposed by the Federal Reserve following the 2016 fake-accounts scandal.

That regulatory constraint was finally lifted in June 2025 — a watershed moment that allowed the bank to resume balance-sheet expansion on equal footing with peers. In its most recent quarterly report, Wells Fargo posted revenue of $21.29 billion, a 4% year-over-year increase but below consensus estimates. Adjusted EPS of $1.76 exceeded expectations, though the quarter included a $612 million severance charge tied to approximately 5,600 workforce reductions. The bank's ROTCE stood at 14.5%, with management targeting 17-18% in the medium term.

Encouragingly, Wells Fargo reported a 20% increase in new credit card accounts and a 19% rise in auto loan balances, reflecting renewed momentum in consumer lending. The bank also guided for approximately $50 billion in NII for 2026 and has been aggressively expanding its investment banking division, hiring 30 managing directors. However, an efficiency ratio of 64% — versus a stated goal of below 60% — indicates that cost discipline remains a work in progress. Following the mixed results and conservative forward guidance, the stock experienced a notable sell-off, falling roughly 4.6% in a single session.

Trending AI Robots

In an environment where bank stocks can shift rapidly on earnings surprises and macroeconomic signals, traders are increasingly turning to AI-driven tools for timely, data-backed insights. Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of AI-powered trading bots, drawn from a broader pool of hundreds of virtual agents that collectively trade thousands of tickers. Only the most consistently relevant and market-adaptive strategies earn a spot in this featured section. Across the platform, top-performing robots have demonstrated annualized returns ranging from approximately 63% to over 290%, employing varied trading styles — from 5-minute high-frequency models to 60-minute trend-following frameworks — and covering equities, ETFs, and beyond. Each bot operates with distinct strategies, risk parameters, and ticker universes, allowing users to find approaches aligned with their objectives. To explore which AI trading bots are currently best suited for prevailing market conditions, visit Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page.

Head-to-Head Comparison

The most fundamental contrast between these two banks lies in scale and business-model maturity. JPM operates as a fully optimized, globally diversified financial ecosystem — its investment bank is the world's largest by revenue, its asset management arm oversees trillions in client assets, and its consumer franchise serves over 60 million active mobile customers. WFC, by comparison, remains tilted toward domestic consumer and commercial lending, though it is actively building out its investment banking and wealth management capabilities.

On profitability, JPMorgan holds a clear advantage: its ROTCE of roughly 21% nearly doubles the industry average and comfortably exceeds Wells Fargo's 14.5%. JPMorgan's CET1 ratio of 14.5% also provides greater capital flexibility. However, Wells Fargo may appeal to investors seeking a turnaround narrative — the asset cap removal, ongoing cost-cutting targeting up to $10 billion in annual savings, and a $40 billion share repurchase authorization collectively form a catalyst-rich story. The risk profile differs too: JPMorgan's exposures are broad and generally well-hedged, while Wells Fargo carries legacy operational risks tied to regulatory remediation and a commercial real estate portfolio that management acknowledges could produce "lumpy" losses.

Momentum-wise, JPMorgan's stock demonstrated relative stability during the latest earnings cycle, while Wells Fargo's post-earnings decline of 4.6% revealed the market's impatience with revenue misses and cautious guidance. In terms of sector positioning, JPMorgan benefits disproportionately from robust capital markets activity, whereas Wells Fargo's revenue mix is more sensitive to domestic interest rate movements and consumer credit trends.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable metrics — including trend consistency, profitability sustainability, and relative positioning — Tickeron's AI-driven analysis would likely favor JPM in the current market environment. JPMorgan's combination of industry-leading ROTCE, diversified revenue streams, and a fortress balance sheet provides the kind of stability and momentum that AI models tend to reward. While WFC presents a compelling turnaround opportunity with the asset cap now removed and cost-efficiency initiatives underway, the bank's lower profitability ratios, higher efficiency ratio, and recent guidance-driven sell-off introduce greater uncertainty into trend-based assessments. An AI-driven framework would likely recognize Wells Fargo's improving trajectory but assign a higher probability of near-term outperformance to JPMorgan, given its more consistent execution and broader competitive moat.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
JPM vs. WFC commentary
Jul 25, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JPM is a Buy and WFC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 25, 2026
Stock price -- (JPM: $349.90 vs. WFC: $86.19)
Brand notoriety: JPM and WFC are both notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: JPM: 109% vs. WFC: 69%
Market capitalization -- JPM: $930.1B vs. WFC: $261.03B
JPM [@Major Banks] is valued at $930.1B. WFC’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $261.03B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $930.1B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $212.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

JPM’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileWFC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • JPM’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • WFC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, JPM is a better buy in the long-term than WFC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

JPM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WFC’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • JPM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WFC’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, JPM is a better buy in the short-term than WFC.

Price Growth

JPM (@Major Banks) experienced а +1.97% price change this week, while WFC (@Major Banks) price change was -2.13% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +0.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.76%.

Reported Earning Dates

JPM is expected to report earnings on Oct 13, 2026.

WFC is expected to report earnings on Oct 13, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+0.70% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JPM($930B) has a higher market cap than WFC($261B). JPM has higher P/E ratio than WFC: JPM (14.99) vs WFC (12.53). JPM YTD gains are higher at: 10.132 vs. WFC (-6.536). WFC has more cash in the bank: 33.5B vs. JPM (22B). WFC has less debt than JPM: WFC (216B) vs JPM (517B). JPM has higher revenues than WFC: JPM (186B) vs WFC (85B).
JPMWFCJPM / WFC
Capitalization930B261B356%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD10.132-6.536-155%
P/E Ratio14.9912.53120%
Revenue186B85B219%
Total Cash22B33.5B66%
Total Debt517B216B239%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
JPM vs WFC: Fundamental Ratings
JPM
WFC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3066
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
84
Overvalued
60
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
822
SMR RATING
1..100
24
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
2237
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4962
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WFC's Valuation (60) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as JPM (84). This means that WFC’s stock grew similarly to JPM’s over the last 12 months.

JPM's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as WFC (22). This means that JPM’s stock grew similarly to WFC’s over the last 12 months.

JPM's SMR Rating (2) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as WFC (4). This means that JPM’s stock grew similarly to WFC’s over the last 12 months.

JPM's Price Growth Rating (22) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as WFC (37). This means that JPM’s stock grew similarly to WFC’s over the last 12 months.

JPM's P/E Growth Rating (49) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as WFC (62). This means that JPM’s stock grew similarly to WFC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
JPMWFC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
JPM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WFC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OCMGX28.48N/A
N/A
OCM Gold Investor
GSPRX33.09N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Equity R
MNNYX78.80N/A
N/A
Victory Multi-Cap Y
ESAGX16.87N/A
N/A
Ashmore Emerging Markets Equity ESG A
AMVYX16.64-0.01
-0.06%
American Century Mid Cap Value Y

WFC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WFC has been closely correlated with BAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WFC jumps, then BAC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WFC
1D Price
Change %
WFC100%
-0.27%
BAC - WFC
80%
Closely correlated
-0.55%
EWBC - WFC
67%
Closely correlated
-0.74%
JPM - WFC
67%
Closely correlated
+0.49%
C - WFC
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.28%
BCS - WFC
47%
Loosely correlated
-1.67%
More