JPM
Price
$337.99
Change
-$2.59 (-0.76%)
Updated
Nov 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
905.33B
72 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WFC
Price
$85.47
Change
-$0.42 (-0.49%)
Updated
Nov 3, 04:14 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
259.73B
72 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

JPM vs WFC

JPM vs WFC Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Oct 25, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) vs. Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • JPM is the largest U.S. bank by assets, operating a diversified franchise spanning investment banking, trading, asset management, and consumer banking, while WFC is the fourth-largest U.S. lender and remains subject to a regulatory asset cap.
  • In its most recent reporting, JPM posted record annual revenue of roughly $182 billion and continued to lead global investment banking, even as a one-time credit card portfolio charge weighed on quarterly profit.
  • WFC has been diversifying toward fee-based income to offset pressure on net interest income (NII — the difference between interest earned on loans and paid on deposits), which has declined amid higher funding costs.
  • Both banks have beaten analyst expectations in recent quarters, but their growth drivers differ: JPM benefits from scale and capital-markets strength, while WFC hinges partly on a potential lifting of its $1.95 trillion asset cap.
  • Relative performance has been strong for both names, with JPM and WFC each outpacing the broader market over the trailing year, though their risk profiles and catalysts differ meaningfully.
  • For additional context on each company, explore JPM Major News and JPM Today's Price Move, as well as WFC Major News and WFC Today's Price Move.
  • To see how automated systems are positioning across these and thousands of other tickers, explore Trending AI Robots.

Introduction

Investors weighing large-cap U.S. banking exposure frequently compare JPM and WFC, two of the country's most widely followed financial institutions with very different operating profiles. This stock comparison is relevant to traders assessing relative momentum, income investors focused on capital returns, and longer-term holders evaluating scale, diversification, and regulatory positioning. While both firms are sensitive to interest rates, credit quality, and the health of the U.S. consumer, their business mixes and near-term catalysts diverge, creating distinct trade-offs in market positioning and risk exposure that warrant a closer look.

JPM Overview and Recent Performance

JPM, or JPMorgan Chase & Co., is the largest U.S. bank by assets and a global leader in investment banking, trading, asset and wealth management, and consumer banking. In recent quarters the firm has demonstrated resilience, reporting record annual revenue near $182 billion and its 13th consecutive year as the top-ranked global investment bank by fees. Net interest income has trended higher, and trading and asset-management segments have provided support. A notable recent development was the firm's agreement to take over the Apple Card portfolio, which required a roughly $2.2 billion credit reserve build that weighed on quarterly profit but also reinforced its scale in premium consumer credit. Sentiment has remained constructive, though management has cautioned about geopolitical risks, sticky inflation, and elevated asset prices.

WFC Overview and Recent Performance

WFC, or Wells Fargo & Company, is the fourth-largest U.S. lender, with strength in consumer banking and lending, commercial banking, and wealth and investment management. Its performance has been shaped by a $1.95 trillion asset cap imposed by regulators following past compliance failures, which has constrained balance-sheet growth and lending. In recent periods, the bank's net interest income has declined as customers migrated to higher-yielding deposit products, but management has offset part of that pressure through fee-based revenue growth and disciplined expense control, while maintaining a solid Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) capital ratio and returning capital through dividends and buybacks. Investors have also focused on the possibility that the asset cap could eventually be lifted, a potential catalyst for renewed growth.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page curates a selection of AI-driven trading bots from a broader library of hundreds of automated strategies that collectively trade thousands of different tickers. Each bot operates with its own trading style, strategy, timeframe, performance record, and set of covered securities, meaning only those best suited to current market conditions earn a place in this curated section. The page highlights bots demonstrating standout statistics, such as strong win rates, favorable profit factors, and consistent historical performance across varying market regimes. For traders seeking a systematic, data-driven complement to fundamental analysis of names like JPM and WFC, exploring Trending AI Robots can offer additional perspective on momentum and timing.

Head-to-Head Comparison

The clearest contrast between the two is scope and diversification. JPM operates a broad, capital-markets-heavy franchise with global reach, generating revenue across investment banking, trading, asset management (with assets under management, or AUM, in the trillions), and consumer banking. WFC, by comparison, is more domestically focused and lending-centric, and its regulatory asset cap limits balance-sheet expansion in a way that JPM does not face. Growth drivers also differ: JPM leans on dealmaking, trading, and asset-gathering, while WFC is pivoting toward fee-based revenue and higher-return, less capital-intensive businesses. On risk, WFC carries unique regulatory and operational-risk overhang, whereas JPM faces cyclical exposure to credit normalization and investment-banking swings. Market sentiment has generally favored the scale and earnings consistency of JPM, though WFC offers a potentially larger turnaround catalyst if its asset cap is relaxed.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, revenue diversification, and stability of earnings, Tickeron's AI would likely favor JPM at present. Its broader business mix, leadership in investment banking and asset management, rising net interest income, and resilient capital position point to steadier underlying momentum and a more consistent trend profile than WFC. That said, WFC retains a meaningful, event-driven catalyst in the form of potential asset-cap relief, which could alter relative positioning if it materializes. The assessment is probabilistic rather than definitive, and relative performance could shift as rate expectations, credit trends, and regulatory developments evolve.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
JPM vs. WFC commentary
Nov 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JPM is a Buy and WFC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
A.I.Advisor
a Summary for JPM with price predictions
Nov 02, 2026

Momentum Indicator for JPM turns positive, indicating new upward trend

JPM saw its Momentum Indicator move above the 0 level on November 02, 2026. This is an indication that the stock could be shifting in to a new upward move. Traders may want to consider buying the stock or buying call options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 82 similar instances where the indicator turned positive. In 54 of the 82 cases, the stock moved higher in the following days. The odds of a move higher are at 66%.

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bullish Trend Analysis

The RSI Indicator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where JPM's RSI Oscillator exited the oversold zone, 15 of 28 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 54%.

The Stochastic Oscillator suggests the stock price trend may be in a reversal from a downward trend to an upward trend. 32 of 54 cases where JPM's Stochastic Oscillator exited the oversold zone resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 59%.

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for JPM just turned positive on October 12, 2026. Looking at past instances where JPM's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 25 of 48 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 52%.

Following a +2.32% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where JPM advanced for three days, in 217 of 364 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 60%.

The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 183 of 342 cases where JPM Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 54%.

Bearish Trend Analysis

JPM moved below its 50-day moving average on October 30, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.

JPM broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 29, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.

Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)

The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 1 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating very strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.

The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 9 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating low risk on high returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 21, placing this stock better than average.

The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 48 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. JPM’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 50 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.

The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 54 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 90 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: JPM's P/B Ratio (2.561) is slightly higher than the industry average of (1.495). P/E Ratio (14.567) is within average values for comparable stocks, (11.672). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (1.562) is also within normal values, averaging (2.139). Dividend Yield (0.019) settles around the average of (0.035) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (4.888) is also within normal values, averaging (3.867).

A.I.Advisor
a Summary for WFC with price predictions
Nov 02, 2026

Momentum Indicator for WFC turns positive, indicating new upward trend

WFC saw its Momentum Indicator move above the 0 level on November 02, 2026. This is an indication that the stock could be shifting in to a new upward move. Traders may want to consider buying the stock or buying call options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 73 similar instances where the indicator turned positive. In 50 of the 73 cases, the stock moved higher in the following days. The odds of a move higher are at 68%.

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bullish Trend Analysis

The RSI Oscillator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where WFC's RSI Oscillator exited the oversold zone, 17 of 26 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 65%.

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for WFC just turned positive on October 09, 2026. Looking at past instances where WFC's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 28 of 47 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 60%.

WFC moved above its 50-day moving average on November 02, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.

Following a +2.60% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where WFC advanced for three days, in 202 of 331 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 61%.

The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 149 of 269 cases where WFC Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 55%.

Bearish Trend Analysis

The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the overbought zone for 3 days. The longer the ticker stays in the overbought zone, the sooner a price pull-back is expected.

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where WFC declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 58%.

WFC broke above its upper Bollinger Band on November 02, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.

Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)

The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 2 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating very strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.

The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 20 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating low risk on high returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 21, placing this stock better than average.

The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 50 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. WFC’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 50 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.

The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 62 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (1.576) is normal, around the industry mean (1.495). P/E Ratio (12.341) is within average values for comparable stocks, (11.672). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (1.264) is also within normal values, averaging (2.139). Dividend Yield (0.023) settles around the average of (0.035) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (3.144) is also within normal values, averaging (3.867).

The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 66 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.

FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
JPM vs WFC: Fundamental Ratings
JPM
WFC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3842
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
90
Overvalued
62
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
920
SMR RATING
1..100
12
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4850
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5466
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WFC's Valuation (62) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as JPM (90). This means that WFC’s stock grew similarly to JPM’s over the last 12 months.

JPM's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as WFC (20). This means that JPM’s stock grew similarly to WFC’s over the last 12 months.

JPM's SMR Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as WFC (2). This means that JPM’s stock grew similarly to WFC’s over the last 12 months.

JPM's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as WFC (50). This means that JPM’s stock grew similarly to WFC’s over the last 12 months.

JPM's P/E Growth Rating (54) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as WFC (66). This means that JPM’s stock grew similarly to WFC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
JPMWFC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 03, 2026
Stock price -- (JPM: $340.58 vs. WFC: $85.89)
Brand notoriety: JPM and WFC are both notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: JPM: 82% vs. WFC: 121%
Market capitalization -- JPM: $905.33B vs. WFC: $259.73B
JPM [@Major Banks] is valued at $905.33B. WFC’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $259.73B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $1.04M to $905.33B. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $196.01B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

JPM’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while WFC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • JPM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • WFC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, WFC is a better buy in the long-term than JPM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

JPM’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WFC’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • JPM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • WFC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, JPM is a better buy in the short-term than WFC.

Price Growth

JPM (@Major Banks) experienced а +1.96% price change this week, while WFC (@Major Banks) price change was +3.92% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was -0.84%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.42%.

Reported Earning Dates

JPM is expected to report earnings on Jan 14, 2027.

WFC is expected to report earnings on Jan 14, 2027.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (-0.84% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

View a ticker or compare two or three
JPM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WFC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement

WFC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WFC has been closely correlated with BAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WFC jumps, then BAC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WFC
1D Price
Change %
WFC100%
+2.99%
BAC - WFC
77%
Closely correlated
-0.88%
EWBC - WFC
67%
Closely correlated
+2.42%
JPM - WFC
67%
Closely correlated
+1.05%
C - WFC
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.93%
RY - WFC
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.78%
More
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WAB286.797.19
+2.57%
Wabtec
CSR59.170.73
+1.25%
Centerspace
KROS10.76-0.28
-2.54%
Keros Therapeutics
STNG86.62-5.98
-6.46%
Scorpio Tankers
GIFT0.48-0.18
-27.68%
Giftify Inc