JPOTF
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 30 closing price
RVLCF
Price
$0.22
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 2 closing price
Ad is loading...

JPOTF vs RVLCF

Header iconJPOTF vs RVLCF Comparison
Open Charts JPOTF vs RVLCFBanner chart's image
Jackpot Digital
Price$0.05
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$27.2K
CapitalizationN/A
Rivalry
Price$0.22
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$4.03K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
JPOTF vs RVLCF Comparison Chart
Loading...
VS
JPOTF vs. RVLCF commentary
Oct 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JPOTF is a Hold and RVLCF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2024
Stock price -- (JPOTF: $0.05 vs. RVLCF: $0.17)
Brand notoriety: JPOTF and RVLCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Casinos/Gaming industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: JPOTF: 19% vs. RVLCF: 435%
Market capitalization -- JPOTF: $6.97M vs. RVLCF: $63.98M
JPOTF [@Casinos/Gaming] is valued at $6.97M. RVLCF’s [@Casinos/Gaming] market capitalization is $63.98M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry ranges from $38.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry is $5.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

JPOTF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRVLCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • JPOTF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RVLCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, JPOTF is a better buy in the long-term than RVLCF.

Price Growth

JPOTF (@Casinos/Gaming) experienced а +7.63% price change this week, while RVLCF (@Casinos/Gaming) price change was +66.62% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Casinos/Gaming industry was +1.79%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.87%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Casinos/Gaming (+1.79% weekly)

Casinos/Gaming includes companies that operate casinos, gaming services, horse racing and harness racing facilities. Think Las Vegas Sands Corp., MGM Resorts International and Wynn Resorts, Ltd. In periods of strong economic growth, consumers tend to spend on discretionary/leisure activities like gambling or games; but consumption is likely to slow down when there’s economic sluggishness.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RVLCF($64M) has a higher market cap than JPOTF($6.97M). JPOTF YTD gains are higher at: -10.160 vs. RVLCF (-77.470). JPOTF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -2.14M vs. RVLCF (-27.6M). RVLCF has more cash in the bank: 8.54M vs. JPOTF (491K). RVLCF has less debt than JPOTF: RVLCF (481K) vs JPOTF (5.33M). RVLCF has higher revenues than JPOTF: RVLCF (33.8M) vs JPOTF (1.75M).
JPOTFRVLCFJPOTF / RVLCF
Capitalization6.97M64M11%
EBITDA-2.14M-27.6M8%
Gain YTD-10.160-77.47013%
P/E Ratio0.10N/A-
Revenue1.75M33.8M5%
Total Cash491K8.54M6%
Total Debt5.33M481K1,109%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
JPOTF: Fundamental Ratings
JPOTF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
83
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
35
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
59
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
89
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL232.150.37
+0.16%
Apple
SPY582.350.05
+0.01%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
TSLA220.89-0.44
-0.20%
Tesla
BTC.X67399.836000-212.882810
-0.31%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME21.41-0.25
-1.15%
GameStop Corp

JPOTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that JPOTF and TPBTF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that JPOTF and TPBTF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JPOTF
1D Price
Change %
JPOTF100%
+5.39%
TPBTF - JPOTF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RVLCF - JPOTF
6%
Poorly correlated
+14.23%
CDRO - JPOTF
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.12%
BTSBF - JPOTF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SKXJF - JPOTF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

RVLCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RVLCF and RANKF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RVLCF and RANKF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RVLCF
1D Price
Change %
RVLCF100%
+14.23%
RANKF - RVLCF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LTFD - RVLCF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JPOTF - RVLCF
6%
Poorly correlated
+5.39%
GAMB - RVLCF
3%
Poorly correlated
-0.40%
CDRO - RVLCF
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.12%
More